Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Gilbert v. Duluth General Electric Co., 100 N.W. 653.

28 citing documents.

Martin v. Northern States Power Co. 72 N.W.2d 867 Minn. 1955
Martin v. Northern States Power Co. 72 N.W.2d 867 Minn. 1955
Co. 93 Minn. 99, 105 , , wherein the court said: “* * * 'Electric companies are bound to use reasonable care in the construction and maintenance of their lines and apparatus.
Baumann v. Interstate Power Co. 252 N.W. 222 Minn. 1934
Baumann v. Interstate Power Co. 252 N.W. 222 Minn. 1934
See, generally, Gilbert v. Duluth G. E. Co. 93 Minn. 99 , , 106 A. S. R. 430; Goar v. Village of Stephen, 157 Minn. 228 , ; Fitch v. City of Blue Earth, 180 Minn. 125 , ; Stark v. Badger P. S. Co. 176 Wis.
Faribault v. Northern States Power Co. 247 N.W. 680 Minn. 1933
Faribault v. Northern States Power Co. 247 N.W. 680 Minn. 1933
Gilbert v. Duluth G. E. Co. 93 Minn. 99 , , 106 A. S. R. 430; Musolf v. Duluth E. E. Co. 108 Minn. 369 , , 24 L.R.A.
Fitch v. City of Blue Earth 230 N.W. 469 Minn. 1930
Fitch v. City of Blue Earth 230 N.W. 469 Minn. 1930
Plaintiff, appellant here, cites Gilbert v. Duluth G. E. Co. 93 Minn. 99 , , 106 A. S. R. 430; Dushaw v. G. N. Ry.
Neumann v. Interstate Power Co. 228 N.W. 342 Minn. 1929
Neumann v. Interstate Power Co. 228 N.W. 342 Minn. 1929
In this court the high degree required of those who transmit electric currents of sufficient voltage to endanger life has been adequately pointed out in Gilbert v. Duluth G. E. Co. 98 Minn. 99 , , 106 A. S. R. 430; Musolf v. Duluth E. E. Co. 108 Minn. 369 , , 24 L.R.A.(N.S.)
Bunten v. Eastern Minnesota Power Co. 228 N.W. 332 Minn. 1929
Bunten v. Eastern Minnesota Power Co. 228 N.W. 332 Minn. 1929
Gilbert v. Duluth G. E. Co. 93 Minn. 99 , 100 N.W.
Goar v. Village of Stephen 196 N.W. 171 Minn. 1923
Goar v. Village of Stephen 196 N.W. 171 Minn. 1923
Co. 93 Minn. 99 , , 106 Am.
Pattock v. St. Cloud Public Service Co. 187 N.W. 969 Minn. 1922
Pattock v. St. Cloud Public Service Co. 187 N.W. 969 Minn. 1922
Co. 93 Minn. 99 , , 106 Am.
Thornton Bros. v. Northern States Power Co. 186 N.W. 863 Minn. 1922
Thornton Bros. v. Northern States Power Co. 186 N.W. 863 Minn. 1922
Co. 93 Minn. 99 , , 106 Am.
Davidson v. Otter Tail Power Co. 185 N.W. 644 Minn. 1921
Davidson v. Otter Tail Power Co. 185 N.W. 644 Minn. 1921
Co. 93 Minn. 99 , , 106 Am.
Drimel v. Union Power Co. 165 N.W. 1058 Minn. 1918
Drimel v. Union Power Co. 165 N.W. 1058 Minn. 1918
Musolf v. Duluth Edison Electric Co. 108 Minn. 369 , , 24 L. R. A. (N. S.) 451; Gilbert v. Duluth General Electric Co. 93 Minn. 99 , , 106 Am.
Hoppe v. City of Winona 129 N.W. 577 Minn. 1911
Hoppe v. City of Winona 129 N.W. 577 Minn. 1911
Co., 93 Minn. 99 , , 106 Am.
Musolf v. Duluth Edison Electric Co. 122 N.W. 499 Minn. 1909
Musolf v. Duluth Edison Electric Co. 122 N.W. 499 Minn. 1909
ch they were intended, then he was a trespasser in his relation to the defendant company, and in either case of licensee or trespasser the same degree of care is not charged upon the defendant company as would be in case of a person upon a public highway, or one who uses electricity furnished by it as a commodity, ■ under the rule announced by this court in Gilbert v. Duluth General Electric Co., 93 Minn. 99 ,” [ , 106 Am.
Wiita v. Interstate Iron Co. 115 N.W. 169 Minn. 1908
Wiita v. Interstate Iron Co. 115 N.W. 169 Minn. 1908
Co., 46 Minn. 269 , , and quoted in Gilbert v. Duluth General Electric Co., 93 Minn. 99, 105 , , 106 Am.