Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Buckman, 104 N.W. 240.

26 citing documents.

McDaniel v. United Hardware Distributing Co. 469 N.W.2d 84 Minn. 1991
McDaniel v. United Hardware Distributing Co. 469 N.W.2d 84 Minn. 1991
703 (1906); State v. Buckman, 95 Minn. 272 , 104 N.W.
Village of Blaine v. Independent School District No. 12 138 N.W.2d 32 Minn. 1965
Village of Blaine v. Independent School District No. 12 138 N.W.2d 32 Minn. 1965
See, State v. McCoy, 228 Minn. 420 , 38 N. W. (2d) 386 ; State v. Fullerton, 124 Minn. 151 , ; and State v. Buckman, 95 Minn. 272 , .
Bingenheimer v. Diamond Iron Mining Co. 54 N.W.2d 912 Minn. 1952
Bingenheimer v. Diamond Iron Mining Co. 54 N.W.2d 912 Minn. 1952
We held there, following State v. Buckman, 95 Minn. 272 , , and State v. Fullerton, 124 Minn. 151 , , that, in cases where the state unsuccessfully asserted its proprietary interests, costs and disbursements were taxable against it.
State v. McCoy 38 N.W.2d 386 Minn. 1949
State Ex Rel. Smiley v. Holm 243 N.W. 133 Minn. 1932
State Ex Rel. Smiley v. Holm 243 N.W. 133 Minn. 1932
In State v. Buckman, 95 Minn. 272 , , the state was held liable for costs and disbursements because it there sought to recover damages for a trespass upon its lands.
Hines v. Taft 240 N.W. 890 Minn. 1932
In Re Guardianship of Robert Ahlman 240 N.W. 890 Minn. 1932
Hines v. Taft 240 N.W. 890 Minn. 1932
The ease of State v. Buckman, 95 Minn. 272 , , was a civil action by the state to recover damages for trespass upon its lands and is not here in point.
State v. Brooks-Scanlon Lumber Co. 150 N.W. 912 Minn. 1915
State v. Brooks-Scanlon Lumber Co. 150 N.W. 912 Minn. 1915
It was enacted before the decision in State v. Buckman, 95 Minn. 272 , , holding that the statute gave a penalty, and that the three years’ statute of limitation applied, but after the holding of the trial court which the supreme court affirmed.
State v. Fullerton 144 N.W. 755 Minn. 1913
State v. Fullerton 144 N.W. 755 Minn. 1913
The case is controlled by State v. Buckman, 95 Minn. 272 , .
State v. Clarke 123 N.W. 54 Minn. 1909
State v. Clarke 123 N.W. 54 Minn. 1909
State v. Buckman, 95 Minn. 272 , .
State v. Rat Portage Lumber Co. 115 N.W. 162 Minn. 1908
State v. Rat Portage Lumber Co. 115 N.W. 162 Minn. 1908
State v. Buckman, 95 Minn. 272 , , involved an action for a penalty.
State v. Northwestern Elevator Co. 112 N.W. 68 Minn. 1907
State v. Northwestern Elevator Co. 112 N.W. 68 Minn. 1907
The defendant claims that it is entitled to tax costs against the state •on the authority of State v. Buckman, 95 Minn. 272, 278 , .
State v. Bonness 109 N.W. 703 Minn. 1906
State v. Bonness 109 N.W. 703 Minn. 1906
*393 The case of State v. Buckman, 95 Minn. 272 , , in principle, is identical with the one at bar.
National Bond & Security Co. v. Hopkins 104 N.W. 678 Minn. 1905
National Bond & Security Co. v. Hopkins 104 N.W. 678 Minn. 1905
The case is unlike that of State v. Buckman, 95 Minn. 272 , , where costs were allowed against the state.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by