Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Stitt v. Rat Portage Lumber Co., 104 N.W. 561.

32 citing documents.

Henschke v. Young 28 N.W.2d 766 Minn. 1947
Henschke v. Young 28 N.W.2d 766 Minn. 1947
Co. 96 Minn. 27 , ; 49 Am.
Hatlestad v. Mutual Trust Life Insurance Co. 268 N.W. 665 Minn. 1936
Hatlestad v. Mutual Trust Life Insurance Co. 268 N.W. 665 Minn. 1936
Co. 96 Minn. 27 , ; Wenzel v. Weigand, 92 Minn. 152 , , declaring a deed absolute in form to be in fact a mortgage are irrelevant for present purposes.
O'Connor v. Schwan 251 N.W. 180 Minn. 1933
O'Connor v. Schwan 251 N.W. 180 Minn. 1933
Co. 96 Minn. 27 , ; Teal v. Scandinavian-Am.
Jeddeloh v. Altman 247 N.W. 512 Minn. 1933
Jeddeloh v. Altman 247 N.W. 512 Minn. 1933
Midland National Bank v. Hendrickson 206 N.W. 723 Minn. 1926
Midland National Bank v. Hendrickson 206 N.W. 723 Minn. 1926
Co. 96 Minn. 27 , ; Young v. Baker, 128 Minn. 398 , .
Lindblood v. Warren Mining Co. 194 N.W. 778 Minn. 1923
Lindblood v. Warren Mining Co. 194 N.W. 778 Minn. 1923
McCall v. Bushnell, 41 Minn. 37 , ; Summit Mercantile Co. v. Daigle, 146 Minn. 218 , ; Stitt v. Rat Portage Lumber Co. 96 Minn. 27 , .
Summit Mercantile Co. v. Daigle 178 N.W. 588 Minn. 1920
Summit Mercantile Co. v. Daigle 178 N.W. 588 Minn. 1920
McCall v. Bushnell, 41 Minn. 37 , ; Stitt v. Eat Portage Lumber Co. 96 Minn. 27 , ; 2 Dunnell, Minn. Dig.
Young v. Baker 151 N.W. 132 Minn. 1915
Young v. Baker 151 N.W. 132 Minn. 1915
Minneapolis Threshing *400 Machine Co. v. Jones, 95 Minn. 127 , ; Stitt v. Rat Portage Lumber Co. 96 Minn. 27, 32 , ; Teal v. Scandinavian American Bank, 114 Minn. 435 , .
Staples v. East St. Paul State Bank 142 N.W. 721 Minn. 1913
Staples v. East St. Paul State Bank 142 N.W. 721 Minn. 1913
Madigan v. Mead, 31 Minn. 94 , ; Stitt v. Rat Portage Lumber Co. 96 Minn. 27 , .
Bennett v. Harrison 132 N.W. 309 Minn. 1911
Bennett v. Harrison 132 N.W. 309 Minn. 1911
In the cases of Stitt v. Rat Portage Lumber Co. 96 Minn. 27 , , and Grout v. Stewart, 96 Minn. 230 , , this court had under consideration transactions constituting equitable mortgages, but the decision in neither case goes to the ex*-, tent necessary to sustain the title of the defendants in the instant case.
Teal v. Scandinavian-American Bank 131 N.W. 486 Minn. 1911
Teal v. Scandinavian-American Bank 131 N.W. 486 Minn. 1911
Stitt v. Rat Portage Lumber Co., 96 Minn. 27 , .
Stitt v. Rat Portage Lumber Co. 116 N.W. 643 Minn. 1908
Stitt v. Rat Portage Lumber Co. 116 N.W. 643 Minn. 1908
Stitt v. Rat Portage Lumber Co. 113 N.W. 901 Minn. 1907
Stitt v. Rat Portage Lumber Co. 113 N.W. 901 Minn. 1907
Stitt v. Rat Portage Lumber Co., 96 Minn. 27 , .
Stitt v. Smith 113 N.W. 632 Minn. 1907
Stitt v. Smith 113 N.W. 632 Minn. 1907
The decision of this court on that appeal will be found in Stitt v. Rat Portage Lumber Co., 96 Minn. 27 , .
Stitt v. Rat Portage Lumber Co. 107 N.W. 824 Minn. 1906
Stitt v. Rat Portage Lumber Co. 107 N.W. 824 Minn. 1906
*57 Moreover the facts bring this case within the rules laid down in Stitt v. Rat Portage Lumber Co., 96 Minn. 27 , , so far as concerns the questions arising under the statute of uses and trusts (section 4280), and under the statute of frauds (section 4213).
Grout v. Stewart 104 N.W. 966 Minn. 1905
Grout v. Stewart 104 N.W. 966 Minn. 1905
See also King v. McCarthy, 50 Minn. 222 , ; Philips v. Mo, 91 Minn. 311 , ; Stitt v. Rat Portage Lumber Co., 94 Minn. 529 , .

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by