Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Stitt v. Rat Portage Lumber Co., 107 N.W. 824.

33 citing documents.

Braaten v. Midwest Farm Shows 360 N.W.2d 455 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Braaten v. Midwest Farm Shows 360 N.W.2d 455 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Stitt v. Rat Portage Lumber Co., 98 Minn. 52 , 107 N.W.
Cyrus v. Cyrus 64 N.W.2d 538 Minn. 1954
Cyrus v. Cyrus 64 N.W.2d 538 Minn. 1954
Co. 98 Minn. 52 , ; see, Kavalaris v. Cordalis, supra; Hammel v. Feigh, 143 Minn. 115 , .
Welsh v. Barnes-Duluth Shipbuilding Co. 21 N.W.2d 43 Minn. 1945
Welsh v. Barnes-Duluth Shipbuilding Co. 21 N.W.2d 43 Minn. 1945
Bannitz v. Hardware Mutual Casualty Co. 17 N.W.2d 372 Minn. 1945
Distinguished Bannitz v. Hardware Mutual Casualty Co. 17 N.W.2d 372 Minn. 1945
Bjornstad v. Northern States Power Co. 263 N.W. 289 Minn. 1935
Bjornstad v. Northern States Power Co. 263 N.W. 289 Minn. 1935
Co. 98 Minn. 52 , ; Nelson v. McElroy, 140 Minn. 429 , .
Weiss v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance 226 N.W. 516 Minn. 1929
Lieberman v. Fox 200 N.W. 468 Minn. 1924
Lieberman v. Fox 200 N.W. 468 Minn. 1924
§ 9737, Ambuehl v. Matthews, 41 Minn. 537 , ; Stitt v. Rat Portage Lumber *451 Co. 98 Minn. 52 , ; Gourd v. County of Morrison, 118 Minn. 294 , ; State ex rel.
Swanson v. Lindstrom 185 N.W. 950 Minn. 1921
Swanson v. Lindstrom 185 N.W. 950 Minn. 1921
Stitt v. Rat Portage Lumber Co. 98 Minn. 52 , ; First International Bank v. Brown, 130 Minn. 210 , .
McRae v. Feigh 173 N.W. 655 Minn. 1919
McRae v. Feigh 173 N.W. 655 Minn. 1919
If all that is to be performed on one side is to be performed within a year, the contract is not within the statute.” In Stitt v. Rat Portage Lumber Co. 98 Minn. 52 , , it is stated: “The statute of frauds has no application where the contract could be performed within the year, nor where it runs for an indefinite time.” In Taylor v. Times Newspaper Co. 83 Minn. 523 , , 85 Am.
Hammel v. Feigh 173 N.W. 570 Minn. 1919
Hammel v. Feigh 173 N.W. 570 Minn. 1919
617; Baldwin v. Eddy, 64 Minn. 425 , ; Stitt v. Rat Portage Lumber Co. 98 Minn. 52 , , 6 L.R.A.(N.S.)
State ex rel. Albert Dickinson Co. v. District Court 165 N.W. 478 Minn. 1917
State ex rel. Albert Dickinson Co. v. District Court 165 N.W. 478 Minn. 1917
841; Bitzer v. Bobo, 39 Minn. 18 , ; Stitt v. Rat Portage Lumber Co. 98 Minn. 52 , ; Gourd v. County of Morrison, 118 Minn. 294 , ; Grannis v. Hitchcock, 118 Minn. 462 , .
First International Bank of Portal v. Brown 153 N.W. 522 Minn. 1915
First International Bank of Portal v. Brown 153 N.W. 522 Minn. 1915
It is axiomatic that “where no definite time is fixed for the continuance of a partnership, it is one at will and either party may dissolve it at pleasure.” Stitt v. Rat Portage Lumber Co. 98 Minn. 52 , .
Kruse v. Tripp 152 N.W. 538 Minn. 1915
Kruse v. Tripp 152 N.W. 538 Minn. 1915
Stitt v. Rat Portage Lumber Co. 98 Minn. 52 , ; 8 Dunnell, Minn. Dig.
Sonnesyn v. Hawbaker 148 N.W. 476 Minn. 1914
Sonnesyn v. Hawbaker 148 N.W. 476 Minn. 1914
Newell v. Cochran, 41 Minn. 374 , ; Stitt v. Rat Portage Lumber Co. 98 Minn. 52 , .
Irvine v. Campbell 141 N.W. 108 Minn. 1913
Irvine v. Campbell 141 N.W. 108 Minn. 1913
448 ; Hardin v. Jamison, 60 Minn. 348 , ; Stitt v. Rat Portage Lumber Co. 98 Minn. 52 , .
Grannis v. Hitchcock 137 N.W. 186 Minn. 1912
Grannis v. Hitchcock 137 N.W. 186 Minn. 1912
Stitt v. Rat Portage Lumber Co. 98 Minn. 52 , .
Gourd v. County of Morrison 136 N.W. 874 Minn. 1912
Gourd v. County of Morrison 136 N.W. 874 Minn. 1912
Stitt v. Rat Portage Lumber Co. 98 Minn. 52 , ; Naas v. Welter, 92 Minn. 404 , .

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by