Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Shevlin-Carpenter Co., 108 N.W. 935.

47 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Mark Robert Moser 884 N.W.2d 890 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Mark Robert Moser 884 N.W.2d 890 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
99 Minn. 158, 160-61, 108 N.W.
State v. Rohan 834 N.W.2d 223 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. Rohan 834 N.W.2d 223 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
State v. Shevlin-Caipenter Co., 99 Minn. 158, 166-67 , 108 N.W.
State v. Behl 564 N.W.2d 560 Minn. 1997
State v. Larson Transfer & Storage, Inc. 246 N.W.2d 176 Minn. 1976
State v. Larson Transfer & Storage, Inc. 246 N.W.2d 176 Minn. 1976
State v. Shevlin-Carpen-ter Co. 99 Minn. 158
State v. Dinneen 184 N.W.2d 16 Minn. 1971
State v. Dinneen 184 N.W.2d 16 Minn. 1971
State v. Shevlin-Carpenter Co. 99 Minn. 158 , .
O'BRIEN v. Phillips Motors Excelsior, Inc. 179 N.W.2d 158 Minn. 1970
O'BRIEN v. Phillips Motors Excelsior, Inc. 179 N.W.2d 158 Minn. 1970
In State v. Shevlin-Carpenter Co. 99 Minn. 158 , *188 , we sustained the validity of L. 1895, c. 163, § 7, which provided: “If any person * * * without a valid and existing permit therefor, cuts or employs, or induces any other person * * * to cut * * * timber * * * on state lands, * * * or carries away * * * such timber * * * , he shall be liable to
Steeves v. State 178 N.W.2d 723 Minn. 1970
Steeves v. State 178 N.W.2d 723 Minn. 1970
State v. Shevlin-Carpenter Co. 99 Minn. 158 , .
State v. Edwards 177 N.W.2d 40 Minn. 1970
State v. Edwards 177 N.W.2d 40 Minn. 1970
Ct. No. 166-1/2, filed June 21, 1968; State v. Shevlin-Carpenter Co., 99 Minn. 158 , ; State v. Moilen, 140 Minn. 112 , ; 5A Dunnell Dig.
State v. Morse 161 N.W.2d 699 Minn. 1968
State v. Morse 161 N.W.2d 699 Minn. 1968
The question of intent as a constitutional prerequisite to guilt has been considered by the United States Supreme Court in Shevlin-Carpenter Co. v. Minnesota, 218 U. S. 57 , 30 S. Ct. 663 , 54 L. ed. 930, affirming our decisions in State v. Shevlin-Carpenter Co. 99 Minn. 158 , , and State v. Shevlin-Carpenter Co. 102 Minn. 470 , , ; in United States v. Balint, 258 U. S. 250 , 42 S. Ct. 301 , 66 L. ed. 604; and in Morissette v. United States, 342 U. S. 246 , 72 S. Ct. 240 , 96 L. ed. 288.
State v. Anderson 159 N.W.2d 892 Minn. 1968
State v. Anderson 159 N.W.2d 892 Minn. 1968
State v. Shevlin-Carpenter Co. 99 Minn. 158 , .
State v. Moseng 95 N.W.2d 6 Minn. 1959
State v. Moseng 95 N.W.2d 6 Minn. 1959
State v. Shevlin-Carpenter Co. 99 Minn. 158 , ; 17 Dunnell, Dig.
State v. Colcord 212 N.W. 894 Minn. 1927
State v. Colcord 212 N.W. 894 Minn. 1927
State v. Shevlin-Carpenter Co. 99 Minn. 158 , , 9 Ann. Cas.
State v. Women's & Children's Hospital Ass'n 184 N.W. 1022 Minn. 1921
State v. Women's & Children's Hospital Ass'n 184 N.W. 1022 Minn. 1921
State v. Erickson, 125 Minn. 238 , ; State v. Shevlin-Carpenter Co. 99 Minn. 158 , , 9 Ann. Cas.
State v. Dombroski 176 N.W. 985 Minn. 1920
State v. Dombroski 176 N.W. 985 Minn. 1920
State v. Shevlin-Carpenter Co. 99 Minn. 158 , , 9 Ann. Cas.
Seamer v. Great Northern Railway Co. 172 N.W. 765 Minn. 1919
Seamer v. Great Northern Railway Co. 172 N.W. 765 Minn. 1919
State v. Droppo, 126 Minn. 68 , ; State v. Erickson, 125 Minn. 238 , ; State v. Shevlin-Carpenter Co. 99 Minn. 158 , , 9 Ann. Cas.
State v. Moilen 167 N.W. 345 Minn. 1918
State v. Moilen 167 N.W. 345 Minn. 1918
State v. Shevlin-Carpenter Co. 99 Minn. 158 , , 9 Ann. Cas.
State v. Harris 158 N.W. 829 Minn. 1916
State v. Harris 158 N.W. 829 Minn. 1916
“It is within the exclusive power of the legislature to declare what acts shall constitute a crime, to define the same, and to provide such punishment therefor as may be deemed appropriate.” State v. Shevlin-Carpenter Co. 99 Minn. 158 , , 9 Ann. Cas.
State v. Brooks-Scanlon Lumber Co. 150 N.W. 912 Minn. 1915
State v. Brooks-Scanlon Lumber Co. 150 N.W. 912 Minn. 1915
State v. Shevlin-Carpenter Co. 99 Minn. 158 , , 9 Ann. Cas.
State v. Droppo 147 N.W. 829 Minn. 1914
State v. Droppo 147 N.W. 829 Minn. 1914
765 ; State v. Madson, 43 Minn. 438 , ; State v. Sbevlin-Carpenter Co. 99 Minn. 158 , , 9 Ann. Cas.
State ex rel. Olson v. Erickson 146 N.W. 364 Minn. 1914
State ex rel. Olson v. Erickson 146 N.W. 364 Minn. 1914
In State v. Shevlin-Carpenter Co. 99 Minn. 158 , , 9 Ann. Cas.
Meshbesher v. Channellene Oil & Manufacturing Co. 119 N.W. 428 Minn. 1909
Meshbesher v. Channellene Oil & Manufacturing Co. 119 N.W. 428 Minn. 1909
See State v. Shevlin-Carpenter Co., 99 Minn. 158, 166 , .
Baumgartner v. Hodgdon 116 N.W. 1030 Minn. 1908
Baumgartner v. Hodgdon 116 N.W. 1030 Minn. 1908
79 ; Fox v. Stevens, 13 Minn. 252 (272); Craig v. Cook, 28 Minn. 232 , ; State v. Shevlin-Carpenter Co., 99 Minn. 158 , ; Anderson v. International Harvester Co., 104 Minn. 49 , .
State v. Rat Portage Lumber Co. 115 N.W. 162 Minn. 1908
State v. Rat Portage Lumber Co. 115 N.W. 162 Minn. 1908
State v. Shevlin-Carpenter Co., 99 Minn. 158 , .
State v. Shevlin-Carpenter Co. 113 N.W. 634 Minn. 1907
State v. Shevlin-Carpenter Co. 113 N.W. 634 Minn. 1907
On a former appeal, upon demurrer to the complaint (State v. Shevlin-Carpenter Co., 99 Minn. 158 , ), the constitutional questions were raised, and it was there held that the act was constitutional, and that in case of trespass the state might recover either the double value of the property taken, or treble its value, according to whether the facts constituted a casual or involuntary, or a wilful an