Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State ex rel. Board of Education v. Brown, 106 N.W. 477.

48 citing documents.

Arens v. Village of Rogers 61 N.W.2d 508 Minn. 1953
Arens v. Village of Rogers 61 N.W.2d 508 Minn. 1953
of Education v. Brown, 97 Minn. 402, 405 , , 5 L.R.A.(N.S.)
Vorbeck v. City of Glencoe 288 N.W. 4 Minn. 1939
Vorbeck v. City of Glencoe 288 N.W. 4 Minn. 1939
Board of Education v. Brown, 97 Minn. 402 , , 5 L.R.A.(N.S.)
Nichols v. City of Eveleth 283 N.W. 539 Minn. 1939
Nichols v. City of Eveleth 283 N.W. 539 Minn. 1939
of Education v. Brown, 97 Minn. 402 , , 5 L.R.A.(N.S.)
State Ex Rel. Peterson v. Severson 261 N.W. 469 Minn. 1935
State Ex Rel. Peterson v. Severson 261 N.W. 469 Minn. 1935
of Ed. v. Brown, 97 Minn. 402 , , 5 L.R.A.(N.S.)
Millett v. City of Hastings 229 N.W. 346 Minn. 1930
Millett v. City of Hastings 229 N.W. 346 Minn. 1930
of Ed. v. Brown, 97 Minn. 402 , , 5 L.R.A.(N.S.)
Giffin, Sr. v. Village of Hibbing 227 N.W. 41 Minn. 1929
Giffin, Sr. v. Village of Hibbing 227 N.W. 41 Minn. 1929
of Ed. v. Brown, 97 Minn. 402 , , 5 L.R.A.
State v. Phillips 223 N.W. 912 Minn. 1929
State v. Phillips 223 N.W. 912 Minn. 1929
of Ed. v. Brown, 97 Minn. 402 , , 5 L.R.A.(N.S.)
Thorpe Bros. Inc. v. County of Itasca 213 N.W. 914 Minn. 1927
Thorpe Bros. Inc. v. County of Itasca 213 N.W. 914 Minn. 1927
of Ed. v. Brown, 97 Minn. 402 , , 5 L. R. A. (N. S.) 327 ; 25 A. L. R. 1143 It is easy to see that under G. S. 1923, § 2070, there might be a question of the validity of some of the outstanding warrants and that an investigation would be attended with difficulty and the result be uncertain.
Szroka v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co. 213 N.W. 557 Minn. 1927
Szroka v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co. 213 N.W. 557 Minn. 1927
of Ed. v. Brown, 97 Minn. 402 , , 5 L. R. A. (N. S.) 327; Alexander v. City of Duluth, 77 Minn. 445 , .
Jensen v. Independent School District No. 17 204 N.W. 49 Minn. 1925
Jensen v. Independent School District No. 17 204 N.W. 49 Minn. 1925
v. Brown, 97 Minn. 402 , , 5 L. R. A. (N. S.) 327; State ex rel.
Schulte v. Fitch 202 N.W. 719 Minn. 1925
Schulte v. Fitch 202 N.W. 719 Minn. 1925
571; State v. Brown, 97 Minn. 402 , , 5 L. R. A. (N. S.) 327.
Driscoll v. Board of County Commissioners 201 N.W. 945 Minn. 1925
Driscoll v. Board of County Commissioners 201 N.W. 945 Minn. 1925
571; State v. Brown, 97 Minn. 402, 407 , , 5 L. R. A. (N. S.) 327.
Roe v. City of Duluth 189 N.W. 429 Minn. 1922
Roe v. City of Duluth 189 N.W. 429 Minn. 1922
Such exceptions are exemplified in State v. Cooley, 56 Minn. 540 , ; Alexander v. City of Duluth, 77 Minn. 445 , ; State v. Brown, 97 Minn. 402 , , 5 L. R. A. (N. S.) 327; Wall v. County of St.
State ex rel. Mathews v. Houdersheldt 186 N.W. 234 Minn. 1922
State ex rel. Mathews v. Houdersheldt 186 N.W. 234 Minn. 1922
State v. O’Connor, 81 Minn. 79 , ; State v. Brown, 97 Minn. 402 , , 5 L. R. A. (N. S.) 327.
Lodoen v. City of Warren 178 N.W. 741 Minn. 1920
Lodoen v. City of Warren 178 N.W. 741 Minn. 1920
Alexander v. City of Duluth, 77 Minn. 445 , ; *185 State v. Ames, 87 Minn. 23 , ; Le Tourneau v. Hugo, 90 Minn. 420 , ; State v. Justus, 90 Minn. 474 , ; State v. Schraps, 97 Minn. 62 , ; State v. Brown, 97 Minn. 402 , , 5 L.R.A.(N.S.)
Mathison v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 148 N.W. 71 Minn. 1914
Mathison v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 148 N.W. 71 Minn. 1914
571; State v. Brown, 97 Minn. 402 , , 5 L.R.A.(N.S.)
Farrell v. Hicken 147 N.W. 815 Minn. 1914
Farrell v. Hicken 147 N.W. 815 Minn. 1914
The legislature applies the same principle where the question of license or no license in villages (State v. Village Council of Osakis, 112 Minn. 365 , ) or of the issuance of school bonds by school districts (State v. Brown, 97 Minn. 402 , , 5 L.R.A.(N.S.)
State v. Bridgeman & Russell Co. 134 N.W. 496 Minn. 1912
State v. Bridgeman & Russell Co. 134 N.W. 496 Minn. 1912
571; State v. Brown, 97 Minn. 402 , , 5 L.R.A.(N.S.)
State ex rel. Larsen v. Scott 126 N.W. 70 Minn. 1910
State ex rel. Larsen v. Scott 126 N.W. 70 Minn. 1910
State v. Brown, 97 Minn. 402 , , 5 L.R.A.(N.S.)
Calderwood v. Jos. Schlitz Brewing Co. 121 N.W. 221 Minn. 1909
Calderwood v. Jos. Schlitz Brewing Co. 121 N.W. 221 Minn. 1909
Thus, in Alexander v. City of Duluth, 77 Minn. 445 , , an act legalizing bonds to take up general indebtedness of cities of a certain class, in State v. Gunn, 92 Minn. 436 , , an act legalizing county orders and .authorizing the issuance of certificates of indebtedness, and in State v. Brown, 97 Minn. 402 , , an act legalizing school bonds, were upheld.
Wall v. County of St. Louis 117 N.W. 611 Minn. 1908
Wall v. County of St. Louis 117 N.W. 611 Minn. 1908
State v. Brown, 97 *406 Minn. 402 , ; Hunter v. City of Tracy, 104 Minn. 378 , .
Hjelm v. Patterson 117 N.W. 610 Minn. 1908
Hjelm v. Patterson 117 N.W. 610 Minn. 1908
oper relation to the subject-matter of the legislation] Section 36, article 4, of the constitution, which authorizes the arbitrary classification of cities, does not apply to counties, and the rule still is that, “when population is the basis of classification, * * * the subject-matter must be such as suggests a necessity for the legislation arising out of the fact of population.” State v. Brown, 97 Minn. 402, 408 , , and cases there cited.
Hunter v. City of Tracy 116 N.W. 922 Minn. 1908
Hunter v. City of Tracy 116 N.W. 922 Minn. 1908
The legislature cannot adopt a mere arbitrary classification, for any classification for the purposes of legislation must rest upon “such a difference in the situation and circumstances of the subjects placed in different classes as suggests the necessity or propriety of different legislation with respect to them.” Nichols v. Walter, 37 Minn. 264, 272 , ; State v. Brown, 97 Minn. 402 , .
Dahlsten v. Anderson 109 N.W. 697 Minn. 1906
Dahlsten v. Anderson 109 N.W. 697 Minn. 1906
This question is *342 fully discussed by Justice Elliott in State v. Brown, 97 Minn. 402 , .