Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Nye v. Kahlow, 107 N.W. 733.

28 citing documents.

  • Sauter v. Wasemiller 364 N.W.2d 833 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • Sauter v. Wasemiller 364 N.W.2d 833 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    305 (1935); Nye v. Karlow, 98 Minn. 81 , 107 N.W.
  • Clifford v. Peterson 149 N.W.2d 75 Minn. 1967
  • Clifford v. Peterson 149 N.W.2d 75 Minn. 1967
    3 Nye v. Kahlow, 98 Minn. 81, 83 , ; Gourd v. County of Morrison, 118 Minn. 294, 299 , ; Underwood v. Town Board of Empire, 217 Minn. 385, 393 , 14 N. W. (2d) 459, 463 ; Wilson v. Home Gas Co. Inc. 267 Minn. 162, 174 , 125 N. W. (2d) 725, 733 ; Daigle v. Twin City Ready Mix Concrete Co. 268 Minn. 136, 138 , 128 N.
  • Collins v. Wickland 88 N.W.2d 83 Minn. 1958
  • Collins v. Wickland 88 N.W.2d 83 Minn. 1958
    Co. 129 Minn. 113 , ; Nye v. Kahlow, 98 Minn. 81 , ; O’Neill v. City of St.
  • In Re Petition of Lippmann 81 N.W.2d 100 Minn. 1957
  • In Re Petition of Lippmann 81 N.W.2d 100 Minn. 1957
    pth of nine feet, and thereby the water would be diverted from its natural course to the great damage of the plaintiffs, for which they would have no adequate remedy at law, would not necessarily be a reason for enjoining its construction by the defendants; but they must secure the right so *15 to do by tbe exercise of tbe power of eminent domain and tbe payment of damages,” citing Nye v. Kablow, 98 Minn. 81 , ; State ex rel.
  • Enderson v. Kelehan 32 N.W.2d 286 Minn. 1948
  • Enderson v. Kelehan 32 N.W.2d 286 Minn. 1948
    § 10165a (in re reasonable carrying capacity of natural drain); Hopkins v. Taylor, supra; Erhard v. Wagner, 104 Minn. 258 , (in re use of artificial watercourse and cutting of watershed); Gilfillan v. Schmidt, supra (in re diversion without damage); Nye v. Kahlow, 98 Minn. 81
  • Czanstkowski v. Matter 6 N.W.2d 629 Minn. 1942
  • Denzer v. Great Northern Railway Co. 248 N.W. 44 Minn. 1933
  • Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. Brown 152 Minn. 325 Minn. 1932
  • Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. Brown 152 Minn. 325 Minn. 1932
    Assignments I and II are clearly insufficient under Moody v. Tschabold, 52 Minn. 51 , ; Butler-Ryan Co. v. Silvey, 70 Minn. 507 , ; Nye v. Kahlow, 98 Minn. 81 , ; Prosser v. Manley, 122 Minn. 448 , ; Holford v. Crowe, 136 Minn. 20 , .
  • Bladine v. Bladine 197 N.W. 261 Minn. 1924
  • Bladine v. Bladine 197 N.W. 261 Minn. 1924
    Nye v. Kahlow, 98 Minn. 81 , ; Prosser v. Manley, 122 Minn. 448 , ; 1 Dunnell, Minn. Dig.
  • Murphy v. Casey 195 N.W. 627 Minn. 1923
  • Murphy v. Casey 195 N.W. 627 Minn. 1923
    Smith v. Kipp, 49 Minn. 119 , ; Stevens v. City of Minneapolis, 42 Minn. 136 , ; Moody v. Tschabold, 52 Minn. 51 , ; Prosser v. Manley, 122 Minn. 448 , ; Nye v. Kahlow, 98 Minn. 81 , .
  • Stravs v. Steckbauer 161 N.W. 259 Minn. 1917
  • Stravs v. Steckbauer 161 N.W. 259 Minn. 1917
    Nye v. Kahlow, 98 Minn. 81 , .
  • Pink v. Metropolitan Milk Co. 152 N.W. 725 Minn. 1915
  • Pink v. Metropolitan Milk Co. 152 N.W. 725 Minn. 1915
    Clark v. C. N. Nelson Lumber Co. 34 Minn. 289 , ; Nye v. Kahlow, 98 Minn. 81 , .
  • Howard v. Illinois Central Railroad 130 N.W. 946 Minn. 1911
  • Howard v. Illinois Central Railroad 130 N.W. 946 Minn. 1911
    Co., 80 Minn. 9 , ; Nye v. Kahlow, 98 Minn. 81 , ; Block v. Great Northern Ry.
  • Bilsborrow v. Pierce 128 N.W. 16 Minn. 1910
  • Bilsborrow v. Pierce 128 N.W. 16 Minn. 1910
    Nye v. Kahlow, 98 Minn. 81 , ; State v. Board of Commrs.
  • Erhard v. Wagner 116 N.W. 577 Minn. 1908
  • Erhard v. Wagner 116 N.W. 577 Minn. 1908
    See Nye v. Kahlow, 981 Minn. 81 , .