Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Niles v. Cooper, 107 N.W. 744.
- Anderson v. Graham Investment Co. 263 N.W.2d 382 Minn. 1978
-
Anderson v. Graham Investment Co.
263 N.W.2d 382
Minn. 1978
May v. Ackerman, 235 Minn. 273 , Niles v. Cooper, 98 Minn. 39 , 107 N.W.
- Flowers v. Germann 1 N.W.2d 424 Minn. 1941
-
Flowers v. Germann
1 N.W.2d 424
Minn. 1941
The legal presumption is that he will make these inquiries, and he is estopped to deny that he made them.’ ” To the same effect are the holdings in Groff v. Ramsey, 19 Minn. 24, 35 (44) ; Siebert v. Rosser, 24 Minn. 155, 161 ; Niles v. Cooper, 98 Minn. 39 , , 13 L.R.A.(N.S.)
- Jefferson County Bank v. Erickson 247 N.W. 245 Minn. 1933
-
Jefferson County Bank v. Erickson
247 N.W. 245
Minn. 1933
Among the cases cited to sustain the text may be noted Niles v. Cooper, 98 Minn. 39 , , 13 L.R.A.
- Roy & Titcomb, Inc. v. Villa 296 P. 260 Ariz. 1931
- Thompson v. First National Bank 231 N.W. 234 Minn. 1930
-
Thompson v. First National Bank
231 N.W. 234
Minn. 1930
Niles v. Cooper, 98 Minn. 39 , 107 N. W. *555 744, 13 L.R.A.(N.S.)
- Watts v. Lundeen 206 N.W. 444 Minn. 1925
-
Watts v. Lundeen
206 N.W. 444
Minn. 1925
Niles v. Cooper, 98 Minn. 39 , , 13 L. R. A. (N. S.) 49; Thompson v. Borg, 90 Minn. 209 , ; Henderson v. Murray, 108 Minn. 76 , , 133 Am.
- Hauger v. J. P. Rodgers Land Co. 194 N.W. 95 Minn. 1923
-
Hauger v. J. P. Rodgers Land Co.
194 N.W. 95
Minn. 1923
Niles v. Cooper, 98 Minn. 39 , , 13 L. R. A. (N. S.) 49; see also note 13 L. R. A. (N. S.) 49.
- Havel v. Costello 175 N.W. 1001 Minn. 1920
-
Havel v. Costello
175 N.W. 1001
Minn. 1920
Macomber v. Kinney, 114 Minn. 146 , , ; Niles v. Cooper, 98 Minn. 39 , , 13 L.R.A.(N.S.)
- Oxborough v. St. Martin 170 N.W. 707 Minn. 1919
-
Oxborough v. St. Martin
170 N.W. 707
Minn. 1919
238; Northwestern Land Co. v. Dewey, 58 Minn. 359 , ; Ludowese v. Amidon, 124 Minn. 288 , ; Niles v. Cooper, 98 Minn. 39 , , 13 L.R.A.(N.S.)
- Butterwick v. Fuller & Johnson Manufacturing Co. 168 N.W. 18 Minn. 1918
-
Butterwick v. Fuller & Johnson Manufacturing Co.
168 N.W. 18
Minn. 1918
Niles v. Cooper, 98 Minn. 39 , , 13 L.R.A.(N.S.)
- Teal v. Scandinavian-American Bank 131 N.W. 486 Minn. 1911
-
Teal v. Scandinavian-American Bank
131 N.W. 486
Minn. 1911
Niles v. Cooper, 98 Minn. 39 , , 13 L.R.A.
- Gaertner v. Western Elevator Co. 116 N.W. 945 Minn. 1908
-
Gaertner v. Western Elevator Co.
116 N.W. 945
Minn. 1908
Niles v. Cooper, 98 Minn. 39 , ; Wood v. West, 146 Ala.
- Coffman v. Christenson 113 N.W. 1064 Minn. 1907
-
Coffman v. Christenson
113 N.W. 1064
Minn. 1907
The further contention of counsel for defendant, to the effect that Christenson, being the owner of the fee of the land, must be presumed to have been in the actual possession thereof when plaintiff redeemed, which possession constituted notice to him of Christenson’s rights, and therefore, within Niles v. Cooper, 98 Minn. 39 , , plaintiff was not a good-faith redemptioner, cannot be sustained.