Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Rogers v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co., 108 N.W. 868.

26 citing documents.

MacIntosh v. Great Northern Railway Co. 188 N.W. 551 Minn. 1922
MacIntosh v. Great Northern Railway Co. 188 N.W. 551 Minn. 1922
Co. 99 Minn. 34 , ; Moores v. Northern Pac.
McNamee v. Hines 184 N.W. 675 Minn. 1921
McNamee v. Hines 184 N.W. 675 Minn. 1921
Co. 99 Minn. 34 , ; Moores v. Northern Pac.
Castle v. Union Pacific Railroad 166 N.W. 767 Minn. 1918
Castle v. Union Pacific Railroad 166 N.W. 767 Minn. 1918
Co. 99 Minn. 34 , ), we find ample evidence to sustain the claim that the coal upon the foot-board was the immediate and therefore the proximate cause of decedent’s fall upon the track as he attempted to board the engine.'
Thompson v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad 158 N.W. 42 Minn. 1916
Thompson v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad 158 N.W. 42 Minn. 1916
Co. 99 Minn. 34 , ; Johnson v. Lindahl, 106 Minn. 382 , ; Moores v. Northern Pac.
Hurley v. Illinois Central Railroad 157 N.W. 1005 Minn. 1916
Hurley v. Illinois Central Railroad 157 N.W. 1005 Minn. 1916
Co. 99 Minn. 34 , ; Moores v. Northern Pacific Ry.
Fitzgerald v. Armour & Co. 151 N.W. 539 Minn. 1915
Fitzgerald v. Armour & Co. 151 N.W. 539 Minn. 1915
Co. 99 Minn. 34 , ; La Pray v. Lavoris Chemical Co. 117 Minn. 152 , 134 * ; Mitton v. Cargill Ele.
Mitton v. Cargill Elevator Co. 144 N.W. 434 Minn. 1913
Mitton v. Cargill Elevator Co. 144 N.W. 434 Minn. 1913
Murphy v. Twin City Taxicab Co. 142 N.W. 716 Minn. 1913
Murphy v. Twin City Taxicab Co. 142 N.W. 716 Minn. 1913
Co. 99 Minn. 34 , , cited with approval in Bruckman v. Chicago, St.
La Pray v. Lavoris Chemical Co. 134 N.W. 313 Minn. 1912
La Pray v. Lavoris Chemical Co. 134 N.W. 313 Minn. 1912
Co. 99 Minn. 34 , ; Moores v. Northern Pacific Ry.
Hull v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. 133 N.W. 852 Minn. 1911
Hull v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. 133 N.W. 852 Minn. 1911
Co. 99 Minn. 34 , ; Moores v. Northern Pacific Ry.
Healy v. Hoy 132 N.W. 208 Minn. 1911
Healy v. Hoy 132 N.W. 208 Minn. 1911
Co. 99 Minn. 34 , ; Moores v. Northern Pacific Ry.
Bruckman v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co. 125 N.W. 263 Minn. 1910
Bruckman v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co. 125 N.W. 263 Minn. 1910
Co., 99 Minn. 34, 35 , , this court said: “The burden was upon the plaintiff to show the alleged negligence, and establish a causal connection between the alleged negligence and the injury.
Moores v. Northern Pacific Railway Co. 121 N.W. 392 Minn. 1909
Moores v. Northern Pacific Railway Co. 121 N.W. 392 Minn. 1909
Co., 99 Minn. 34 , ; Johnson v. Lindahl, 106 Minn. 382 , ; Flack v. Western Union Tel.