National Bond & Security Co. v. Alderson
Cited by
- Art Goebel, Inc. v. Northern Suburban Agencies, Inc. 555 N.W.2d 549 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
- Morrison v. Swenson 142 N.W.2d 640 Minn. 1966
- First National Bank v. New York Life Insurance 255 N.W. 831 Minn. 1934
- Martin v. Business Men's Assurance Co. of America 246 N.W. 882 Minn. 1933
- Lueck v. New York Life Insurance Co. 240 N.W. 363 Minn. 1932
- Allen v. Metropolitan Life Insurance 229 N.W. 879 Minn. 1930
- Sawyer v. Mutual Life Insurance 207 N.W. 307 Minn. 1926
- Reagan v. Philadelphia Life Insurance 206 N.W. 162 Minn. 1925
- Coughlin v. Reliance Life Insurance 201 N.W. 920 Minn. 1925
- Koivisto v. Bankers & Merchants Fire Insurance 181 N.W. 580 Minn. 1921
- Wellberg v. Duluth Auto Supply Co. 177 N.W. 924 Minn. 1920
- Doeren v. Krammer 170 N.W. 609 Minn. 1919
Opinion text
BROWN, J. In proceedings to register title under the Torrens act, applicant relied upon an unrecorded deed from the conceded owner of the land sought to be registered, and he asked to have determined the priority Of certain tax liens. Judgment was given for the applicant in the court below, and the state appealed. . It is insisted that applicant was without standing or right to maintain the proceeding, for the reason that his title was not of record at *138 the time it was commenced; his deed from the conceded owner not having at that time been recorded. We do not concur in this contention. The Torrens act provides that the “owner” may have his title registered by proceeding in the manner therein directed, and, though some provisions thereof seem to justify the suggestion that the applicant must be the record owner, it would require a strained construction to hold with the state on this point, and say that none but those who appear upon the records as owners of real property are entitled to the relief provided by the act. So we construe the act as entitling any owner of land, whether his title be of record in the office of the register of deeds or not, to maintain proceedings thereunder to register his title. All other points made by appellant are disposed of by the opinion of Mr. Justice Lewis in Gates v. Keigher, infra. Judgment and order affirmed.