Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite National Bond & Security Co. v. Alderson, 108 N.W. 861.

16 citing documents.

Art Goebel, Inc. v. Northern Suburban Agencies, Inc. 555 N.W.2d 549 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
See Kilborn v. Prudential Ins., 99 Minn. 176, 180 , (agents presumed to act within scope of authority).
Morrison v. Swenson 142 N.W.2d 640 Minn. 1966
Co. 99 Minn. 176, 182 , , we said: “The designation of agents as ‘general,’ ‘special,’ ‘local,’ and ‘soliciting’ agents in a rough way serves to indicate their powers, but it is of little importance as between the principal and persons who deal with the agent.” As long ago as Kausal v. Minnesota Farmers Mutual Fire Ins.
First National Bank v. New York Life Insurance 255 N.W. 831 Minn. 1934
Martin v. Business Men's Assurance Co. of America 246 N.W. 882 Minn. 1933
Co. 99 Minn. 176 , ; Union C. L. Ins.
Lueck v. New York Life Insurance Co. 240 N.W. 363 Minn. 1932
Co. 99 Minn. 176 , ; Allen v. Metropolitan L. Ins.
Allen v. Metropolitan Life Insurance 229 N.W. 879 Minn. 1930
Sawyer v. Mutual Life Insurance 207 N.W. 307 Minn. 1926
Co. 99 Minn. 176 , , which is to the contrary.
Reagan v. Philadelphia Life Insurance 206 N.W. 162 Minn. 1925
Co. 99 Minn. 176, 180 , .
Coughlin v. Reliance Life Insurance 201 N.W. 920 Minn. 1925
Co. 99 Minn. 176 , ; Aetna Life Ins.
Koivisto v. Bankers & Merchants Fire Insurance 181 N.W. 580 Minn. 1921
Co. 99 Minn. 176 , , and to Hertz v. Security Mut.
Wellberg v. Duluth Auto Supply Co. 177 N.W. 924 Minn. 1920
Co. 99 Minn. 176 , ; Dispatch Printing Co. v. National Bank of Commerce, 109 Minn. 440 , , 50 L.R.A.(N.S.)
Doeren v. Krammer 170 N.W. 609 Minn. 1919
Co. 99 Minn. 176, 179 , , cited by defendants, did not involve indorsing the principal’s name by the agent.
Hertz v. Security Mutual Insurance 154 N.W. 745 Minn. 1915
Peters v. City of Duluth 137 N.W. 390 Minn. 1912
Peters v. City of Duluth 137 N.W. 390 Minn. 1912
See State v. Westfall, supra; National B. & S. Co. v. Alderson, 99 Minn. 137 , ; Hendricks v. Hess, supra.
Security Bank v. Petruschke 112 N.W. 1000 Minn. 1907
The insurance company accepted the note in payment of the premium (Kilborn v. Prudential Insurance Co., 99 Minn. 176 , ), and the policy was therefore in force from the time of its delivery.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by