Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Stearns v. Kennedy, 103 N.W. 212.

41 citing documents.

Minnesota Building & Loan Ass'n v. Closs 234 N.W. 872 Minn. 1931
Minnesota Building & Loan Ass'n v. Closs 234 N.W. 872 Minn. 1931
Co. 159 Minn. 315 , , 38 A. L. R. 310; Schraiberg v. Hanson, 138 Minn. 80 , ; Stearns v. Kennedy, 94 Minn. 439 , ; Abbott v. Moldestad, 74 Minn. 293 , , 73 A. S. R. 348; Smith v. Lytle, 27 Minn. 184 , .
Monroe v. Thulin 233 N.W. 241 Minn. 1930
Monroe v. Thulin 233 N.W. 241 Minn. 1930
We are of the opinion that Stearns v. Kennedy, 94 Minn. 439 , , is authority for a recovery here.
West v. Walker 231 N.W. 826 Minn. 1930
Emerson-Brantingham Implement Co. v. Cook 206 N.W. 170 Minn. 1925
Emerson-Brantingham Implement Co. v. Cook 206 N.W. 170 Minn. 1925
See Baldwin v. Rogers, 28 Minn. 544 , ; Stearns v. Kennedy, 94 Minn. 439 , , and, aside from this, the evidence did not require a finding of fraud, and the finding that there was no fraud is sustained.
Brees v. Anderson 191 N.W. 266 Minn. 1922
Brees v. Anderson 191 N.W. 266 Minn. 1922
Stearns v. Kennedy, 94 Minn. 439 , .
United States Installment Realty Co. v. DeLancy Co. 188 N.W. 212 Minn. 1922
United States Installment Realty Co. v. DeLancy Co. 188 N.W. 212 Minn. 1922
Wagner v. Magee, 130 Minn. 162 , ; The Encyclopedia Press, Inc. v. Harris, 140 Minn. 145 , ; Stearns v. Kennedy, 94 Minn. 439 , ; Humphrey v. Sievers, 137 Minn. 373 , ; Townsend v. Jahr, 147 Minn. 30 , .
O'Neil v. Davidson 180 N.W. 102 Minn. 1920
O'Neil v. Davidson 180 N.W. 102 Minn. 1920
*245 Stearns v. Kennedy, 94 Minn. 439 , ; Ritko v. Grove, 102 Minn. 312 , ; Humphrey v. Sievers, 137 Minn. 373 ; ; Townsend v. Jahr, 147 Minn. 30 , , all relate to sales or exchanges of land, where neither the occupancy nor payment of part of the purchase price resembles the occupancy, and rents paid
School District 56 Consolidated v. Schmidt 178 N.W. 892 Minn. 1920
School District 56 Consolidated v. Schmidt 178 N.W. 892 Minn. 1920
Stearns v. Kennedy, 94 Minn. 439 , .
Greenfield v. Olson 173 N.W. 416 Minn. 1919
Greenfield v. Olson 173 N.W. 416 Minn. 1919
Stearns v. Kennedy, 94 Minn. 439 , ; 3 Dunnell, Minn. Dig.
Schultz v. Consolidated School District No. 1 168 N.W. 552 Minn. 1918
Schultz v. Consolidated School District No. 1 168 N.W. 552 Minn. 1918
348; Stearns v. Kennedy, 94 Minn. 439 , ; 3 Pomeroy, Eq.
Nelson v. Berkner 166 N.W. 347 Minn. 1918
Nelson v. Berkner 166 N.W. 347 Minn. 1918
260 , it not being in accord with our own decisions of Steams v. Kennedy, 94 Minn. 439 , ; Lang v. Merbach, 96 Minn. 431 , .
Shraiberg v. Hanson 163 N.W. 1032 Minn. 1917
Shraiberg v. Hanson 163 N.W. 1032 Minn. 1917
Stearns v. Kennedy, 94 Minn. 439 , .
Humphrey v. Sievers 163 N.W. 737 Minn. 1917
Humphrey v. Sievers 163 N.W. 737 Minn. 1917
Thompson v. Libby, 36 Minn. 287 , ; Haven v. Neal, 43 Minn. 315 , ; Stearns v. Kennedy, 94 Minn. 439 , ; Ritko v. Grove, 103 Minn. 312 , .
Baxter v. Brandenburg 163 N.W. 516 Minn. 1917
Baxter v. Brandenburg 163 N.W. 516 Minn. 1917
Vogel v. D. M. Osborne & Co. 32 Minn. 167 , ; Reeves & Co. v. Cress, 80 Minn. 466 , ; Stearns v. Kennedy, 94 Minn. 439, 444
Olson v. Northern Pacific Railway Co. 148 N.W. 67 Minn. 1914
Olson v. Northern Pacific Railway Co. 148 N.W. 67 Minn. 1914
Appellant confidently relies on Stearns v. Kennedy, 94 Minn. 439 , .
Nelson v. Gjestrum 136 N.W. 858 Minn. 1912
Nelson v. Gjestrum 136 N.W. 858 Minn. 1912
And further it is said that this court, by the decisions in Fleckten v. Spicer, 63 Minn. 454 , ; Brown v. Doyle, 69 Minn. 543 , ; Scheerschmidt v. Smith, 74 Minn. 224 , ; Howe v. Coates, 90 Minn. 508 , , and Stearns v. Kennedy, 94 Minn. 439 , , has receded from the rule first established by the decision of Reynolds v. Franklin, 44 Minn. 30 , , 20 Am.
Kasal v. Hlinka 136 N.W. 569 Minn. 1912
Kasal v. Hlinka 136 N.W. 569 Minn. 1912
There is no question that, under the executory contract for the sale of the land by the Chromys to Hlinka and Picha, the latter became the equitable owners of the land (Stearns v. Kennedy, 94 Minn. 439, 442 , ) and trustees for the vendor as to the unpaid portion of the purchase price (Smith v. Lyttle, 27 Minn. 184, 190 , ).
Clark v. Thorpe Bros. 135 N.W. 387 Minn. 1912
Clark v. Thorpe Bros. 135 N.W. 387 Minn. 1912
Riggs v. Thorpe, 67 Minn. 217 , ; Porter v. Fletcher, 25 Minn. 493 ; Stearns v. Kennedy, 94 Minn. 439 , .
Ritko v. Grove 113 N.W. 629 Minn. 1907
Ritko v. Grove 113 N.W. 629 Minn. 1907
Porter v. Fletcher, 25 Minn. 493 ; Griffin v. Farrier, 32 Minn. 474 , ; Mountain v. Day, 91 Minn. 249 , ; Stearns v. Kennedy, 94 Minn. 439 , .
Lang v. Merbach 105 N.W. 415 Minn. 1905
Lang v. Merbach 105 N.W. 415 Minn. 1905
Stearns v. Kennedy, 94 Minn. 439 , .
Vallentyne v. Immigration Land Co. 103 N.W. 1028 Minn. 1905
Followed Vallentyne v. Immigration Land Co. 103 N.W. 1028 Minn. 1905
The case of Stearns v. Kennedy, 94 Minn. 439 , , is an action somewhat similar to the one at bar.