Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite McKenzie v. Banks, 103 N.W. 497.

26 citing documents.

State v. Staat 192 N.W.2d 192 Minn. 1971
State v. Staat 192 N.W.2d 192 Minn. 1971
See, e. g., Sticha v. Benzick, 156 Minn. 52 , McKenzie v. Banks, 94 Minn. 496 , Pierson v. People, 79 N. Y. 424 (1880); People v. Lay, 254 App. Div. 372 , 5 N. Y. S. 2d 325 (1938), affirmed, 279 N. Y. 737 , 18 N. E. 2d 686 (1939); State v. Boehme, 71 Wash.
Patton v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 71 N.W.2d 861 Minn. 1955
Patton v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 71 N.W.2d 861 Minn. 1955
McKenzie v. Banks, 94 Minn. 496 , ; Holm v. G. N. Ry.
Backstrom v. New York Life Insurance 259 N.W. 681 Minn. 1935
Backstrom v. New York Life Insurance 259 N.W. 681 Minn. 1935
Its effect Avas “to set aside entirely the trial, with all of its evidence and proceedings, and the case then stands precisely as if no trial had ever been had.” McKenzie v. Banks, 94 Minn. 496, 497 , .
Olson v. Purity Baking Co. 242 N.W. 283 Minn. 1932
Olson v. Purity Baking Co. 242 N.W. 283 Minn. 1932
Hathaway v. Brown, 22 Minn. 214 ; McKenzie v. Banks, 94 Minn. 496 , .
Osborn v. Will 236 N.W. 197 Minn. 1931
Osborn v. Will 236 N.W. 197 Minn. 1931
Co. 62 Minn. 243 , ; McKenzie v. Banks, 94 Minn. 496 , ; Lesch v. G. N. Ry.
Lundblad v. Erickson 230 N.W. 473 Minn. 1930
Lundblad v. Erickson 230 N.W. 473 Minn. 1930
McKenzie v. Banks, 94 Minn. 496 , ; Holm v. G. N. Ry.
Sullivan v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 200 N.W. 922 Minn. 1924
Sullivan v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 200 N.W. 922 Minn. 1924
91 Minn. 311 , ; McKenzie v. Banks, 94 Minn. 496 , ; Virtue v. Creamery Package Co. 123 Minn. 17, 44 , , L. R. A. 1915B, 1179, 1195; Farmer v. Studebaker Corp. 126 Minn. 346 , ; Van Cappellan v. C. St.
Marlow v. Streefland 195 N.W. 488 Minn. 1923
Marlow v. Streefland 195 N.W. 488 Minn. 1923
Co. 139 Minn. 258 , ; McKenzie v. Banks, 94 Minn. 496 , .
Quinn-Shepherdson Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 183 N.W. 347 Minn. 1921
Quinn-Shepherdson Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 183 N.W. 347 Minn. 1921
Anthony Falls Bank v. Graham, 67 Minn. 318 , ; McKenzie v. Banks, 94 Minn. 496 , ; Holm v. Great Northern Ry.
Holm v. Great Northern Railway Co. 166 N.W. 224 Minn. 1918
Holm v. Great Northern Railway Co. 166 N.W. 224 Minn. 1918
The effect of an order granting a new trial “is to set aside entirely the trial,' with all its evidence and proceedings, and the case then stands precisely as if no trial had ever been had.” McKenzie v. Banks, 94 Minn. 496 , .
Mullen v. Otter Tail Power Co. 158 N.W. 732 Minn. 1916
Mullen v. Otter Tail Power Co. 158 N.W. 732 Minn. 1916
See McKenzie v. Banks, 94 Minn. 496 , .
Ellertson v. Roholt 123 N.W. 811 Minn. 1909
Ellertson v. Roholt 123 N.W. 811 Minn. 1909
The trial court did not place much stress on the testimony of the defendant who claimed to have seen the note, but was of opinion that, “leaving out his testimony on .that point, there is other evidence in the case sustaining the verdict of the jury.” Counsel for defendant insist that this testimony was for the jury (White v. Collins, 90 Minn. 165 , ; McKenzie v. Banks, 94 Minn. 496 , ; Krenz v. Lee, 104 Minn. 455 , ), and refers us in particular to Thompson v. Pioneer-Press Co., 37 Minn. 285 ,
Schornak v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance 104 N.W. 1087 Minn. 1905
Schornak v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance 104 N.W. 1087 Minn. 1905
McKenzie v. Banks, 94 Minn. 496 , .