Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Schwab v. Baremore, 104 N.W. 10.
- Space Center, Inc. v. 451 CORP. 298 N.W.2d 443 Minn. 1980
-
Space Center, Inc. v. 451 CORP.
298 N.W.2d 443
Minn. 1980
Raymond v. McKenzie, 220 Minn. 234 , Schwab v. Baremore, 95 Minn. 295 , 104 N.W.
- Raymond v. McKenzie 19 N.W.2d 423 Minn. 1945
-
Raymond v. McKenzie
19 N.W.2d 423
Minn. 1945
In Schwab v. Baremore, 95 Minn. 295, 296 , , an executory contract for the sale of land contained the following provision: “* * * ^nd ft js agreed that if the title to said premises is not good and cannot be made good this agreement shall be void and the above fifty dollars refunded.” In that case, the wife of the seller did not join in the
- Kirk v. Welch 3 N.W.2d 426 Minn. 1942
-
Kirk v. Welch
3 N.W.2d 426
Minn. 1942
Co. v. Wick, 171 Minn. 127 , ; Schwab v. Baremore, 95 Minn. 295 , .
- Miller v. O. B. McClintock Co. 297 N.W. 724 Minn. 1941
-
Miller v. O. B. McClintock Co.
297 N.W. 724
Minn. 1941
Schwab v. Baremore, 95 Minn. 295 , ; 12 Am.
- Robitshek Investment Co. v. Wick 213 N.W. 551 Minn. 1927
-
Robitshek Investment Co. v. Wick
213 N.W. 551
Minn. 1927
Co. 126 Minn. 72 , ; Schwab v. Baremore, 95 Minn. 295 , .
- Horseth v. Fuglesteen 205 N.W. 607 Minn. 1925
-
Horseth v. Fuglesteen
205 N.W. 607
Minn. 1925
In Schwab v. Baremore, 95 Minn. 295 , ,.
- Westfall v. Ellis 170 N.W. 339 Minn. 1919
-
Westfall v. Ellis
170 N.W. 339
Minn. 1919
“The rule of practical construction applies only in cases where tire contract is indefinite, uncertain, or susceptible of different interpretations.” Schwab v. Baremore, 95 Minn. 295 , .
- Nostdal v. Morehart 157 N.W. 584 Minn. 1916
-
Nostdal v. Morehart
157 N.W. 584
Minn. 1916
Mackey v. Ames, 31 Minn. 103 , ; Schwab v. Baremore, 95 Minn. 295 , .
- True v. Northern Pacific Railway Co. 147 N.W. 948 Minn. 1914
-
True v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.
147 N.W. 948
Minn. 1914
404 ; Schwab v. Baremore, 95 Minn. 295 , .
- Kasal v. Hlinka 136 N.W. 569 Minn. 1912
-
Kasal v. Hlinka
136 N.W. 569
Minn. 1912
The conceded facts bring the case within the rule stated in Schwab v. Baremore, 95 Minn. 295 , , and following the rule there stated we hold that the plaintiff cannot prevail in this action against the defendant Thomas Hlinka.
- Hubachek v. Maxbass Security Bank 134 N.W. 640 Minn. 1912
-
Hubachek v. Maxbass Security Bank
134 N.W. 640
Minn. 1912
Mackay v. Ames, 31 Minn. 103 , ; Schwab v. Baremore, 95 Minn. 295 , .
- Stromme v. Rieck 119 N.W. 948 Minn. 1909
-
Stromme v. Rieck
119 N.W. 948
Minn. 1909
Schwab v. Baremore, 95 Minn. 295 , ; Weitzner v. Thingstad, 55 Minn. 244 , .
- Lockwood v. Geier 109 N.W. 245 Minn. 1906
-
Lockwood v. Geier
109 N.W. 245
Minn. 1906
Schwab v. Baremore, 95 Minn. 295 , .