Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Western Union Telegraph Co., 104 N.W. 567.

30 citing documents.

Governmental Research Bureau, Inc. v. Borgen 28 N.W.2d 760 Minn. 1947
Governmental Research Bureau, Inc. v. Borgen 28 N.W.2d 760 Minn. 1947
Co. 96 Minn. 13 , ; State ex rel.
State v. Haglin 13 N.W.2d 6 Minn. 1944
State v. Haglin 13 N.W.2d 6 Minn. 1944
Co. 96 Minn. 13 , where the complaint is quite similar to that in the instant case; State v. Western Union Tel.
Bemis Bro. Bag Company v. Wallace 266 N.W. 690 Minn. 1936
Bemis Bro. Bag Company v. Wallace 266 N.W. 690 Minn. 1936
Co. 96 Minn. 13, 21 , 104 R. W. 567, 571, the court again referred to this section as the one determining “the value of their property of all kinds as a system.” Other cases pointing in the *225 same direction are State v. Cudahy Packing Co. 103 Minn. 419, 423 , ; State v. Farmers & M. Sav.
Oglesby v. Chandler 288 P. 1034 Ariz. 1930
In Re Estate of Taylor 219 N.W. 153 Minn. 1928
In Re Estate of Taylor 219 N.W. 153 Minn. 1928
Co. 96 Minn. 13 , 104 N.W.
State Ex Rel. Inter-State Iron Co. v. Armson 207 N.W. 727 Minn. 1926
State Ex Rel. Inter-State Iron Co. v. Armson 207 N.W. 727 Minn. 1926
Co. 96 Minn. 13 , , in support of their claim that no non-statutory deductions can be considered because the final determination by the commission of the value of the ore is conclusive unless it be shown that a mistake was made which is so gross as to be inconsistent with the exercise of a fair and honest judgment.
State v. Crete Mining Co. 204 N.W. 932 Minn. 1925
State v. Crete Mining Co. 204 N.W. 932 Minn. 1925
Co. 96 Minn. 13 , , it was said that no consistent rule of interpretation has been laid down by the authorities and that a statute imposing a tax is to be construed fairly and reasonably so as to effectuate legislative intention, and to compel property protected by the state to contribute its ratable share of public rev
State v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co. 180 N.W. 548 Minn. 1920
State v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co. 180 N.W. 548 Minn. 1920
Co. 96 Minn. 13 , 104 N W. 567; State v. W. U. Tel.
State v. Koochiching Realty Co. 177 N.W. 940 Minn. 1920
State v. Koochiching Realty Co. 177 N.W. 940 Minn. 1920
State ex rel. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Minnesota Tax Commission 155 N.W. 1061 Minn. 1916
State v. McPhail 145 N.W. 108 Minn. 1914
State v. McPhail 145 N.W. 108 Minn. 1914
Co. 96 Minn. 13 , , this omnibus clause was said to be adequate for the taxation of the property of foreign corporations as a system.
Hardwick Farmers Elevator Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. 124 N.W. 819 Minn. 1910
Hardwick Farmers Elevator Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. 124 N.W. 819 Minn. 1910
Co., 96 Minn. 13 , ; Detroit v. Common Council, 125 Mich.
State v. Western Union Telegraph Co. 124 N.W. 380 Minn. 1910
State v. Western Union Telegraph Co. 124 N.W. 380 Minn. 1910
Co., 96 Minn. 13, 15 , .
State v. Cudahy Packing Co. 115 N.W. 645 Minn. 1908
State v. Cudahy Packing Co. 115 N.W. 645 Minn. 1908
Co., 96 Minn. 13 , ), and less than was imposed by law upon domestic corporations (section 838, R. L. 1905), because the tax on their shares of stock includes, in effect, the valuation of both tangible and intangible property as united in use.
State v. Duluth & Northern Minnesota Railway Co. 112 N.W. 897 Minn. 1907
State v. Duluth & Northern Minnesota Railway Co. 112 N.W. 897 Minn. 1907
See, however, State v. Western Union Telegraph Company, 96 Minn. 13 , .
State ex rel. Foot v. Bazille 106 N.W. 93 Minn. 1905
State ex rel. Foot v. Bazille 106 N.W. 93 Minn. 1905
Co., 96 Minn. 13 , ; Treat v. White, 181 U. S. 264 , 21 Sup.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by