DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite McDonald v. Campbell, 104 N.W. 760.

26 citing documents.

  • Cyrus v. Cyrus 64 N.W.2d 538 Minn. 1954
  • Cyrus v. Cyrus 64 N.W.2d 538 Minn. 1954
    4 Blumberg v. Palm, 238 Minn. 249 , 56 N. W. (2d) 412 ; Hamilton v. Boyce, 234 Minn. 290 , 48 N. W. (2d) 172 ; Hammel v. Feigh, 143 Minn. 115 , ; Meagher v. Fogarty, 129 Minn. 417 , ; McDonald v. Campbell, 96 Minn. 87 , .
  • Blumberg v. Palm 56 N.W.2d 412 Minn. 1953
  • Blumberg v. Palm 56 N.W.2d 412 Minn. 1953
    Hamilton v. Boyce, 234 Minn. 290 , 48 N. W. (2d) 172 ; Hammel v. Feigh, 143 Minn. 115 , ; Meagher *253 v. Fogarty, 129 Minn. 417 , ; McDonald v. Campbell, 96 Minn. 87 , .
  • Hamilton v. Boyce 48 N.W.2d 172 Minn. 1951
  • Hamilton v. Boyce 48 N.W.2d 172 Minn. 1951
    McDonald v. Campbell, 96 Minn. 87 , .
  • Sullivan v. Huber 297 N.W. 33 Minn. 1941
  • Sullivan v. Huber 297 N.W. 33 Minn. 1941
    The court said ( 96 Minn. 139 , ): “The evidence, it is true, tends very strongly to corroborate the contention of defendant as to the prior location of this line; but it is not conclusive.
  • Randall Co. v. Briggs 248 N.W. 752 Minn. 1933
  • Randall Co. v. Briggs 248 N.W. 752 Minn. 1933
    McDonald v. Campbell, 96 Minn. 87, 89 , .
  • Keil v. Fuller 193 N.W. 37 Minn. 1923
  • Keil v. Fuller 193 N.W. 37 Minn. 1923
    The facts bring the case as respects the law on the subject within the rule stated and applied in McDonald v. Campbell, 96 Minn. 87 , .
  • Moore v. Thorpe 158 N.W. 235 Minn. 1916
  • Moore v. Thorpe 158 N.W. 235 Minn. 1916
    McDonald v. Campbell, 96 Minn. 87 , ; McAlpine v. Millen, 104 Minn. 289 , .
  • Foot, Schulze & Co. v. Porter 154 N.W. 1078 Minn. 1915
  • Foot, Schulze & Co. v. Porter 154 N.W. 1078 Minn. 1915
    Boosalis v. Stevenson, 62 Minn. 193 , ; Rosenbaum v. Howard, 69 Minn. 41 , 71 N. W, 823; McDonald v. Campbell, 96 Minn. 87 , .
  • T. R. Foley Co. v. McKinley 131 N.W. 316 Minn. 1911
  • T. R. Foley Co. v. McKinley 131 N.W. 316 Minn. 1911
    McDonald v. Campbell, 96 Minn. 87 , ; McAlpine v. Millen, 104 Minn.. 289, .
  • Jacobson v. McCullough 129 N.W. 759 Minn. 1911
  • Jacobson v. McCullough 129 N.W. 759 Minn. 1911
    In McDonald v. Campbell, 96 Minn. 87, 89 , , it is said: “Where a partnership is the legal result of the agreement actually made, parties are partners, even though they have stipulated that they are not to be partners.” ■ The contract was entered into and performed on their part without any agreement between them that their interests should
  • McAlpine v. Millen 116 N.W. 583 Minn. 1908
  • McAlpine v. Millen 116 N.W. 583 Minn. 1908
    As said in McDonald v. Campbell, 96 Minn. 87 , , there is no arbitrary test by which to determine when a partnership exists.
  • Church v. Odell 110 N.W. 346 Minn. 1907
  • Church v. Odell 110 N.W. 346 Minn. 1907
    335 , 8 L. R. A. 657, and note; McDonald v. Campbell, 96 Minn. 87 , ; Bloom *102 v. Lofgren, 64 Minn. 1 , .
  • Baremore v. Selover, Bates & Co. 110 N.W. 66 Minn. 1907
  • Baremore v. Selover, Bates & Co. 110 N.W. 66 Minn. 1907
    617; McDonald v. Campbell, 96 Minn. 87 , .