Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State ex rel. Patterson v. Bates, 104 N.W. 709.

28 citing documents.

Free Minnesota Small Business Coalition, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Ninetieth Minnesota State Senate v. Dayton 903 N.W.2d 609 Minn. 2017
Ninetieth Minnesota State Senate v. Dayton 903 N.W.2d 609 Minn. 2017
See State v. Bates, 96 Minn. 110 , 104 N.W.
State v. M.D.T. 831 N.W.2d 276 Minn. 2013
St. Paul Companies, Inc. v. Hatch 449 N.W.2d 130 Minn. 1989
St. Paul Companies, Inc. v. Hatch 449 N.W.2d 130 Minn. 1989
Patterson v. Bates, 96 Minn. 110 , 104 N.W.
In re Proceedings to Contest Election Upon Amendment No. 17 to Charter 99 N.W.2d 468 Minn. 1959
In re Proceedings to Contest Election Upon Amendment No. 17 to Charter 99 N.W.2d 468 Minn. 1959
Patterson v. Bates, 96 Minn. 110 , ; Street v. Chicago, M. & St.
Valley National Bank v. Apache County 114 P.2d 883 Ariz. 1941
Ilg Electric Ventilating Co. v. Conner 215 N.W. 675 Minn. 1927
Ilg Electric Ventilating Co. v. Conner 215 N.W. 675 Minn. 1927
Patterson v. Bates, 96 Minn. 110 , , 113 A. S. R. 612; Paxton & Hershey I. C. & L. Co. v. Farmers & Merchants I. & L. Co. 45 Neb.
Vacation of Part of Town of Hibbing 204 N.W. 534 Minn. 1925
In re Hull 163 Minn. 439 Minn. 1925
In re Hull 163 Minn. 439 Minn. 1925
This and much more is well put in State v. Crosby, 92 Minn. 176 , , and in State v. Bates, 96 Minn. 110 , , 113 Am.
Vacation of Part of Town of Hibbing 204 N.W. 534 Minn. 1925
636 , and in State v. Bates, 96 Minn. 110 , 104 N.W.
Kempien v. Board of County Commissioners 199 N.W. 442 Minn. 1924
Kempien v. Board of County Commissioners 199 N.W. 442 Minn. 1924
of Polk County, 87 Minn. 325 , , 60 L. R. A. 161; State v. Bates, 96 Minn. 110 , , 113 Am.
State ex rel. Skordahl v. Flaherty 167 N.W. 122 Minn. 1918
State ex rel. Skordahl v. Flaherty 167 N.W. 122 Minn. 1918
of Hennepin County, 84 Minn. 472 , and State v. Bates, 96 Minn. 110 , , 113 Am.
State v. Northern Pacific Railway Co. 166 N.W. 351 Minn. 1918
State v. Northern Pacific Railway Co. 166 N.W. 351 Minn. 1918
1101; State v. Bates, 96 Minn. 110 , , 113 Am.
State ex rel. Maryland Casualty Co. v. District Court 158 N.W. 798 Minn. 1916
State ex rel. Maryland Casualty Co. v. District Court 158 N.W. 798 Minn. 1916
McCormick v. Village of West Duluth, 47 Minn. 272 , ; State v. Bates, 96 Minn. 110 , , 113 Am.
State ex rel. Young v. Minnesota Club 119 N.W. 494 Minn. 1909
State ex rel. Young v. Brill 111 N.W. 294 Minn. 1907
State ex rel. Young v. Brill 111 N.W. 294 Minn. 1907
State v. Crosby, supra, noted a modern tendency to sustain statutes which impose duties of an uncertain or mixed character upon the courts; and in State v. Bates, 96 Minn. 110 , , it was said that governmental powers are not in their nature necessarily either executive, legislative, or judicial.
State ex rel. Foot v. Bazille 106 N.W. 93 Minn. 1905
State ex rel. Foot v. Bazille 106 N.W. 93 Minn. 1905
The rule was applied recently by this court in State v. Bates, 96 Minn. 110 , , a case involving the construction of a statute of far greater indefiniteness and uncertainty than the one in the case at bar, and where, to save the statute from total destruction, words which ap *14 parently rendered it nugatory and without effect were wholly eliminated therefrom.