Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State ex rel. Young v. Village of Kent, 104 N.W. 948.

34 citing documents.

State Ex Rel. Danielson v. Village of Mound 48 N.W.2d 855 Minn. 1951
State Ex Rel. Danielson v. Village of Mound 48 N.W.2d 855 Minn. 1951
Young v. Village of Kent, 96 Minn. 255 , , 1 L.R.A.
State Ex Rel. Arpagaus v. Todd 29 N.W.2d 810 Minn. 1947
State Ex Rel. Arpagaus v. Todd 29 N.W.2d 810 Minn. 1947
Young v. Village of Kent, 96 Minn. 255, 258 , , 1 L.R.A.
State ex rel. City of St. Paul v. Oehler 15 N.W.2d 783 Minn. 1944
State Ex Rel. City of St. Paul v. Oehler 15 N.W.2d 783 Minn. 1944
State Ex Rel. City of St. Paul v. Oehler 15 N.W.2d 783 Minn. 1944
Young v. Village of Kent, 96 Minn. 255 , 258 , 104 N.W.
State ex rel. City of St. Paul v. Oehler 15 N.W.2d 783 Minn. 1944
Young v. Village of Kent, 96 Minn. 255, 258 , , 1 L.R.A.
State Ex Rel. Burnquist v. Village of North Pole 6 N.W.2d 458 Minn. 1942
State Ex Rel. Burnquist v. Village of North Pole 6 N.W.2d 458 Minn. 1942
Young v. Village of Kent, 96 Minn. 255 , , 1 L.R.A.
Dollenmayer v. Ryder 286 N.W. 297 Minn. 1939
Dollenmayer v. Ryder 286 N.W. 297 Minn. 1939
Young v. Village of Kent, 96 Minn. 255, 258 , , 1 L.R.A.(N.S.)
State Ex Rel. Dahl v. Fredrickson 277 N.W. 407 Minn. 1938
State Ex Rel. Dahl v. Fredrickson 277 N.W. 407 Minn. 1938
Young v. Village of Kent, 96 Minn. 255, 271 , , 1 L.R.A.(N.S.)
State Ex Rel. Christianson v. Johnson 275 N.W. 684 Minn. 1937
State Ex Rel. Christianson v. Johnson 275 N.W. 684 Minn. 1937
Young v. Village of Kent, 96 Minn. 255 , , 1 L.R.A.(N.S.)
State Ex Rel. Town of Stuntz v. City of Chisholm 264 N.W. 798 Minn. 1936
State Ex Rel. Town of Stuntz v. City of Chisholm 264 N.W. 798 Minn. 1936
Young v. Village of Kent, 96 Minn. 255 , 104 N.W.
State Ex Rel. Peterson v. District Court 264 N.W. 227 Minn. 1935
State Ex Rel. Peterson v. District Court 264 N.W. 227 Minn. 1935
Young v. Village of Kent, 96 Minn. 255 , , 1 L.R.A.(N.S.)
State Ex Rel. Peterson v. City of Fraser 254 N.W. 776 Minn. 1934
State Ex Rel. Peterson v. City of Fraser 254 N.W. 776 Minn. 1934
Young v. Village of Kent, 96 Minn. 255, 264 , , 1 L.R.A.(N.S.)
State Ex Rel. v. So-Called "Village of Minnewashta" 206 N.W. 455 Minn. 1925
State Ex Rel. v. So-Called "Village of Minnewashta" 206 N.W. 455 Minn. 1925
v. Kent, 96 Minn. 255 (264), (1 L. R. A. [N. S.] 826, 6 Ann. Cas.
State ex rel. Hilton v. Village of Kinney 178 N.W. 815 Minn. 1920
State ex rel. Hilton v. Village of Kinney 178 N.W. 815 Minn. 1920
Paul & Sioux City R. Co. 35 Minn. 222 , , Chief Justice Gilfillan said: “As between the remedy in this court by quo warranto and that by action in the district court, it is for the attorney general, to whom the interests of the state in such cas *314 es are intrusted, to determine which he will pursue.” This statement is cited with approval in State v. Village of Kent, 96 Minn. 255 , , 1 L.R.A.(N.S.)
State ex rel. Peacock v. Village Council of Osakis 128 N.W. 295 Minn. 1910
State ex rel. Peacock v. Village Council of Osakis 128 N.W. 295 Minn. 1910
1127; State v. Village of Kent, 96 Minn. 255 , , 1 L.R.A.(N.S.)
State ex rel. Wah-We-Yea-Cumin v. Olson 119 N.W. 799 Minn. 1909
State ex rel. Wah-We-Yea-Cumin v. Olson 119 N.W. 799 Minn. 1909
455 ; State v. Village of Kent, 96 Minn. 255 , , 1 L. R. A. (N. S.) 826.
State ex rel. Ross v. Posz 118 N.W. 1014 Minn. 1908
State ex rel. Ross v. Posz 118 N.W. 1014 Minn. 1908
Whether a writ should be granted rests in the first instance in the discretion of the court, and if it be conceded that the court may thereafter again exercise its discretion in quashing the .writ after its issuance (State v. Village of Kent, 96 Minn. 255 , , 1 L. R. A. [N. S.] 826, where the question is referred to), the present case presented sufficient facts to call for a determination of the merits of the controversy, and it was improperly quashed.
State ex rel. Young v. Robinson 112 N.W. 269 Minn. 1907
State ex rel. Young v. Robinson 112 N.W. 269 Minn. 1907
State v. Village of Kent, 96 Minn. 255 , , 1 L. R. A. (N. S.) 826; 4 Cyc.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by