Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Niles v. Cooper, 107 N.W. 744.

25 citing documents.

Anderson v. Graham Investment Co. 263 N.W.2d 382 Minn. 1978
Anderson v. Graham Investment Co. 263 N.W.2d 382 Minn. 1978
May v. Ackerman, 235 Minn. 273 , Niles v. Cooper, 98 Minn. 39 , 107 N.W.
Flowers v. Germann 1 N.W.2d 424 Minn. 1941
Flowers v. Germann 1 N.W.2d 424 Minn. 1941
The legal presumption is that he will make these inquiries, and he is estopped to deny that he made them.’ ” To the same effect are the holdings in Groff v. Ramsey, 19 Minn. 24, 35 (44) ; Siebert v. Rosser, 24 Minn. 155, 161 ; Niles v. Cooper, 98 Minn. 39 , , 13 L.R.A.(N.S.)
Jefferson County Bank v. Erickson 247 N.W. 245 Minn. 1933
Jefferson County Bank v. Erickson 247 N.W. 245 Minn. 1933
Among the cases cited to sustain the text may be noted Niles v. Cooper, 98 Minn. 39 , , 13 L.R.A.
Roy & Titcomb, Inc. v. Villa 296 P. 260 Ariz. 1931
Thompson v. First National Bank 231 N.W. 234 Minn. 1930
Thompson v. First National Bank 231 N.W. 234 Minn. 1930
Niles v. Cooper, 98 Minn. 39 , 107 N. W. *555 744, 13 L.R.A.(N.S.)
Watts v. Lundeen 206 N.W. 444 Minn. 1925
Watts v. Lundeen 206 N.W. 444 Minn. 1925
Niles v. Cooper, 98 Minn. 39 , , 13 L. R. A. (N. S.) 49; Thompson v. Borg, 90 Minn. 209 , ; Henderson v. Murray, 108 Minn. 76 , , 133 Am.
Hauger v. J. P. Rodgers Land Co. 194 N.W. 95 Minn. 1923
Hauger v. J. P. Rodgers Land Co. 194 N.W. 95 Minn. 1923
Niles v. Cooper, 98 Minn. 39 , , 13 L. R. A. (N. S.) 49; see also note 13 L. R. A. (N. S.) 49.
Havel v. Costello 175 N.W. 1001 Minn. 1920
Havel v. Costello 175 N.W. 1001 Minn. 1920
Macomber v. Kinney, 114 Minn. 146 , , ; Niles v. Cooper, 98 Minn. 39 , , 13 L.R.A.(N.S.)
Oxborough v. St. Martin 170 N.W. 707 Minn. 1919
Oxborough v. St. Martin 170 N.W. 707 Minn. 1919
238; Northwestern Land Co. v. Dewey, 58 Minn. 359 , ; Ludowese v. Amidon, 124 Minn. 288 , ; Niles v. Cooper, 98 Minn. 39 , , 13 L.R.A.(N.S.)
Butterwick v. Fuller & Johnson Manufacturing Co. 168 N.W. 18 Minn. 1918
Butterwick v. Fuller & Johnson Manufacturing Co. 168 N.W. 18 Minn. 1918
Niles v. Cooper, 98 Minn. 39 , , 13 L.R.A.(N.S.)
Teal v. Scandinavian-American Bank 131 N.W. 486 Minn. 1911
Teal v. Scandinavian-American Bank 131 N.W. 486 Minn. 1911
Niles v. Cooper, 98 Minn. 39 , , 13 L.R.A.
Gaertner v. Western Elevator Co. 116 N.W. 945 Minn. 1908
Gaertner v. Western Elevator Co. 116 N.W. 945 Minn. 1908
Niles v. Cooper, 98 Minn. 39 , ; Wood v. West, 146 Ala.
Coffman v. Christenson 113 N.W. 1064 Minn. 1907
Coffman v. Christenson 113 N.W. 1064 Minn. 1907
The further contention of counsel for defendant, to the effect that Christenson, being the owner of the fee of the land, must be presumed to have been in the actual possession thereof when plaintiff redeemed, which possession constituted notice to him of Christenson’s rights, and therefore, within Niles v. Cooper, 98 Minn. 39 , , plaintiff was not a good-faith redemptioner, cannot be sustained.