DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Turner v. Fryberger, 109 N.W. 229.

30 citing documents.

  • In Re Guardianship of Strom 286 N.W. 245 Minn. 1939
  • Abrahamson v. Strom 286 N.W. 245 Minn. 1939
  • Abrahamson v. Strom 286 N.W. 245 Minn. 1939
    (Cf. Turner v. Fryberger, 99 Minn. 236 , , .)
  • In Re Guardianship of Strom 286 N.W. 245 Minn. 1939
    Turner v. Fryberger, 99 Minn. 236 , 108 N.W.
  • Kehrer v. Seeman 235 N.W. 386 Minn. 1931
  • Kehrer v. Seeman 235 N.W. 386 Minn. 1931
    Kent v. Costin, 130 Minn. 450 , ; Mann v. Lamb, 83 Minn. 14 , ; Turner v. Fryberger, 99 Minn. 236 , , ; Bahr v. Union F. Ins.
  • A. L. Goetzmann Co. v. Gazett 214 N.W. 895 Minn. 1927
  • A. L. Goetzmann Co. v. Gazett 214 N.W. 895 Minn. 1927
    Citing Turner v. Fryberger, 99 Minn. 236 , , , and Hause v. O’Leary, 136 Minn. 126 , , plaintiff contends that the credits arising from transactions between plaintiff and Gazett’s administrators cannot be set off against the claim filed in the probate court.
  • Bahr v. Union Fire Insurance 209 N.W. 490 Minn. 1926
  • Bahr v. Union Fire Insurance 209 N.W. 490 Minn. 1926
    Where as here a motion for additional findings upon material issues is made, it only “is error to refuse them if they rest upon undisputed evidence, or the evidence to the contrary is so slight that a contrary finding could not stand.” Turner v. Fryberger, 99 Minn. 236 , , .
  • Lieberman v. Fox 200 N.W. 468 Minn. 1924
  • Lieberman v. Fox 200 N.W. 468 Minn. 1924
    Turner v. Fryberger, 99 Minn. 236 , , , holds that “a motion for particular findings as to material issues on which the court has failed to make findings requires the court to make findings on such issues as he may find the facts to be, although the motion to make the particular findings is denied.” See also First Nat.
  • Seitz v. Union Brass & Metal Manufacturing Co. 189 N.W. 586 Minn. 1922
  • Seitz v. Union Brass & Metal Manufacturing Co. 189 N.W. 586 Minn. 1922
    Turner v. Fryberger, 99 Minn. 236 , , ; Orr v. Sutton, 127 Minn. 37 , , Ann. Cas.
  • Boyum v. Jordan 178 N.W. 158 Minn. 1920
  • Boyum v. Jordan 178 N.W. 158 Minn. 1920
    Either concurrence in the act or acquiescence without original concurrence will relieve the trustee from responsibility to the beneficiary.” Turner v. Fryberger, 99 Minn. 236 , , .
  • Hause v. O'Leary 161 N.W. 392 Minn. 1917
  • Hause v. O'Leary 161 N.W. 392 Minn. 1917
    Turner v. Fryberger, 99 Minn. 236 , , .
  • Rockey v. Joslyn 158 N.W. 787 Minn. 1916
  • Rockey v. Joslyn 158 N.W. 787 Minn. 1916
    This practice is approved in Williams v. Schembri, 44 Minn. 250 , ; Bahnsen v. Gilbert, 55 Minn. 334 , Turner v. Fryberger, 99 Minn. 236 , , ; and it was followed in Gross Iron Ore Co. v. Paulle, 132 Minn. 160 , .
  • Andrus v. Dyckman Hotel Co. 148 N.W. 566 Minn. 1914
  • Orr v. Sutton 148 N.W. 1066 Minn. 1914
  • Orr v. Sutton 148 N.W. 1066 Minn. 1914
    Turner v. Eryberger, 99 Minn. 236 , , .
  • Andrus v. Dyckman Hotel Co. 148 N.W. 566 Minn. 1914
    However, the court did not err in refusing to find the “facts as to the claimed illegality of the contract; for the general rule that findings, if duly demanded, must be made upon matters in issue or litigated by consent (Turner v. Fryberger, 99 Minn. 236, 239 , , , ; First Nat.
  • Garceau v. McNamara 145 N.W. 809 Minn. 1914
  • Garceau v. McNamara 145 N.W. 809 Minn. 1914
    Turner v. Fryberger, 99 Minn. 236 , , .
  • First National Bank v. Towle 137 N.W. 291 Minn. 1912
  • First National Bank v. Towle 137 N.W. 291 Minn. 1912
    Swick v. Sheridan, supra; Turner v. Fryberger, 99 Minn. 236 , , .
  • Swick v. Sheridan 119 N.W. 791 Minn. 1909
  • Swick v. Sheridan 119 N.W. 791 Minn. 1909
    Turner v. Fryberger, 99 Minn. 236 , , .