Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite McDonald v. Smith, 108 N.W. 291.

39 citing documents.

Lake Company v. Molan 131 N.W.2d 734 Minn. 1964
Lake Company v. Molan 131 N.W.2d 734 Minn. 1964
McDonald v. Smith, 99 Minn. 42 , ; Hare v. Bauer, 223 Minn. 285 , 26 N. W. *498 (2d) 359.
Hare v. Bauer 26 N.W.2d 359 Minn. 1947
Hare v. Bauer 26 N.W.2d 359 Minn. 1947
McDonald v. Smith, 99 Minn. 42 , ; Id.
Kaercher v. Schee 249 N.W. 180 Minn. 1933
Kaercher v. Schee 249 N.W. 180 Minn. 1933
advised defendants that his customers were ready to buy on defendants’ terms, after having theretofore agreed so to do, defendants’ refusal to contract, without just reason or excuse, and their repudiation of the agreement with plaintiff, breached the contract and dispensed with the necessity of production of buyers.” See also Vaughan v. McCarthy, 59 Minn. 199 , ; McDonald v. Smith, 99 Minn. 42 , ; Smith v. Mellen, 116 Minn. 198 , ; Boydstun v. Hackney L. C. Co. 145 Minn. 392 , ; Huntley v. Smit
Stead v. Erickson 234 N.W. 678 Minn. 1931
Stead v. Erickson 234 N.W. 678 Minn. 1931
t makes the point that plaintiff, being only an exclusive agent to sell the farm, had not the exclusive right to sell; hence defendant could himself sell without incurring any obligation to pay plaintiff commission, and cites Armstrong v. Wann, 29 Minn. 126 , , and all the cases from other jurisdictions therein cited; Baars v. Hyland, 65 Minn. 150 , ; McDonald v. Smith, 99 Minn. 42 , ; Smith v. Preiss, 117 Minn. 392 , , Ann. Cas.
State v. Sweeney 231 N.W. 225 Minn. 1930
State v. Sweeney 231 N.W. 225 Minn. 1930
§ 1770; Fredin v. Richards, 66 Minn. 46 , ; McDonald v. Smith, 99 Minn. 42 , ; State Bank v. Strandberg, 148 Minn. 108 , ; State Bank v. Fassbender, 164 Minn. 317 , ; Pleason R. & I. Co. v. Kleinman, 165 Minn. 342 , .
Smithburg v. Beaudoux 213 N.W. 58 Minn. 1927
Smithburg v. Beaudoux 213 N.W. 58 Minn. 1927
We think these findings clearly entitle plaintiff to recover under the rule stated in McDonald v. Smith, 99 Minn. 42 , .
Pleason Realty & Investment Co. v. Kleinman 206 N.W. 645 Minn. 1925
Pleason Realty & Investment Co. v. Kleinman 206 N.W. 645 Minn. 1925
State Bank v. Strandberg, 148 Minn. 108 , ; McDonald v. Smith, 99 Minn. 42 , ; Fredin v. Richards, 66 Minn. 46 , ; Farnham v. Kennedy, 28 Minn. 365 , .
State Bank of Gibbon v. Fassbender 204 N.W. 953 Minn. 1925
State Bank of Gibbon v. Fassbender 204 N.W. 953 Minn. 1925
Fredin v. Richards, 66 Minn. 46 , ; McDonald v. Smith, 99 Minn. 42 , ; State Bank v. Strandberg, 148 Minn. 108 , .
Reed v. Lycan 193 N.W. 728 Minn. 1923
Reed v. Lycan 193 N.W. 728 Minn. 1923
McDonald v. Smith, 99 Minn. 42 , .
Huntley v. Smith 190 N.W. 341 Minn. 1922
Huntley v. Smith 190 N.W. 341 Minn. 1922
McDonald v. Smith, 99 Minn. 42 , .
Bergh v. Stanek 184 N.W. 371 Minn. 1921
Bergh v. Stanek 184 N.W. 371 Minn. 1921
McDonald v. Smith, 99 Minn. 42 , .
State Bank v. Strandberg 180 N.W. 1006 Minn. 1921
State Bank v. Strandberg 180 N.W. 1006 Minn. 1921
Schmidt v. Baumann, 36 Minn. 189 , ; Fredin v. Richards, 66 Minn. 46 , ; McDonald v. Smith, 99 Minn. 42 , .
Kamper v. Hunter Land Co. 178 N.W. 747 Minn. 1920
Matloch v. Jerabek 164 N.W. 587 Minn. 1917
Matloch v. Jerabek 164 N.W. 587 Minn. 1917
McDonald v. Smith, 99 Minn. 43 , .
Horan v. Stevens 159 N.W. 1085 Minn. 1916
Horan v. Stevens 159 N.W. 1085 Minn. 1916
Goss v. Stevens, 32 Minn. 472 ; ; Francis v. Baker, 45 Minn. 83 , ; McDonald v. Smith, 99 Minn. 42 , ; Gransbury v. Saterbak, 116 Minn. 339 , ; Meyer v. Keating Land & Mortgage Co. 126 Minn. 409 , ; Martinson v. Hensler, 132 Minn. 437 , .
Goldman v. Weisman 143 N.W. 983 Minn. 1913
Goldman v. Weisman 143 N.W. 983 Minn. 1913
The requisites of a broker’s right to commissions are well stated in McDonald v. Smith, 99 Minn. 42, 44 , 292 , where, among other things, it is said: “It is not necessary that the principal and the purchaser actually be brought face to face, but the principal must be notified that such purchaser has been found and afforded a full opportunity to make a binding contract for the sale of the land on
Smith v. Mellen 133 N.W. 566 Minn. 1911
Smith v. Mellen 133 N.W. 566 Minn. 1911
McDonald v. Smith, 99 Minn. 42 , .
C. H. Graves & Co. v. Cook 131 N.W. 854 Minn. 1911
C. H. Graves & Co. v. Cook 131 N.W. 854 Minn. 1911
McDonald v. Smith, 99 Minn. 42 , ; Hamlin v. Schulte, 34 Minn. 534 , .
Anderson v. Olson 124 N.W. 3 Minn. 1910
Anderson v. Olson 124 N.W. 3 Minn. 1910
McDonald v. Smith, 99 Minn. 42 , .
McDonald v. Smith 112 N.W. 627 Minn. 1907
McDonald v. Smith 112 N.W. 627 Minn. 1907
’ McDonald v. Smith, 99 Minn. 42, .