Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Lindahl v. Supreme Court I. O. F., 110 N.W. 358.

33 citing documents.

Hoeft v. Hennepin County 754 N.W.2d 717 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Hoeft v. Hennepin County 754 N.W.2d 717 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
*727 that "where the cause of death is in doubt, there is a presumption of law against death by suicide.”); Lindahl v. Supreme Court I.O.F., 100 Minn. 87, 95 , 110 N.W.
Brown v. St. Paul City Railway Co. 62 N.W.2d 688 Minn. 1954
Brown v. St. Paul City Railway Co. 62 N.W.2d 688 Minn. 1954
e exists an attorney-client relationship the mere delivery of the document to an attorney does not create a privilege (Grant v. United States, 227 U. S. 74 , 33 S. Ct. 190 , 57 L. ed. 423; see, 8 Wigmore, Evidence [3 ed.] § 2307, p. 594); (c) a document which is privileged when delivered to an attorney retains whatever privilege it had in the hands of the client (Lindahl v. Supreme Court I. O. F. 100 Minn. 87 , , 8 L.R.A.[N.S.]
Schmitt v. Emery 2 N.W.2d 413 Minn. 1942
Schmitt v. Emery 2 N.W.2d 413 Minn. 1942
Lindahl v. Supreme Court I. O. F. 100 Minn. 87 , , 8 L.R.A.(N.S.)
Park Construction Co. v. Independent School District No. 32 296 N.W. 475 Minn. 1941
Skrivanek v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen 269 N.W. 111 Minn. 1936
Skrivanek v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen 269 N.W. 111 Minn. 1936
Lindahl v. Supreme Court I. O. F. 100 Minn. 87 , , 8 L.R.A.(N.S.)
Garbush v. New York Life Insurance Co. 214 N.W. 795 Minn. 1927
Garbush v. New York Life Insurance Co. 214 N.W. 795 Minn. 1927
In Hawkins v. Kronick C. & L. Co. 157 Minn. 33 , , we considered Lindahl v. Supreme Court I. O. F. 100 Minn. 87 , , 8 L.R.A.(N.S.)
Hawkins v. Kronick Cleaning & Laundry Co. 195 N.W. 766 Minn. 1923
Hawkins v. Kronick Cleaning & Laundry Co. 195 N.W. 766 Minn. 1923
It is argued that, where circumstantial evidence is relied on to prove suicide, the party having the affirmative of that issue must *36 establish facts which preclude any reasonable hypothesis of natural or accidental death, and Lindahl v. Supreme Court I. O. F. 100 Minn. 87 , , 8 L. R. A. (N. S.) 916, 117 Am.
Farrar v. Locomotive Engineers Mutual Life & Accident Insurance 173 N.W. 705 Minn. 1919
Farrar v. Locomotive Engineers Mutual Life & Accident Insurance 173 N.W. 705 Minn. 1919
Lindahl v. Supreme Court I. O. F. 100 Minn. 87 , , 8 L.R.A.(N.S.)
State ex rel. Oliver Iron Mining Co. v. District Court 164 N.W. 582 Minn. 1917
State ex rel. Oliver Iron Mining Co. v. District Court 164 N.W. 582 Minn. 1917
616; Lindahl v. Supreme Court I. O. F. 100 Minn. 87 , , 8 L.R.A.
National Council of Knights & Ladies of Security v. Turovh 161 N.W. 225 Minn. 1917
National Council of Knights & Ladies of Security v. Turovh 161 N.W. 225 Minn. 1917
Lindahl v. Supreme Court I. O. F. 100 Minn. 87 , , 8 L.R.A.(NS.)
Meyer v. Travelers Insurance 153 N.W. 523 Minn. 1915
Meyer v. Travelers Insurance 153 N.W. 523 Minn. 1915
1244; Lindhal v. Supreme Court I. O. F. 100 Minn. 87 , , 8 L.R.A.(N.S.)
Kulberg v. National Council of Knights & Ladies of Security 145 N.W. 120 Minn. 1914
Kulberg v. National Council of Knights & Ladies of Security 145 N.W. 120 Minn. 1914
As said in Lindahl v. Supreme Court I. O. F. 100 Minn. 87, 91 , , 8 L.R.A.(N.S.)
Marcus v. National Council of Knights & Ladies of Security 143 N.W. 265 Minn. 1913
Marcus v. National Council of Knights & Ladies of Security 143 N.W. 265 Minn. 1913
* * * Moreover, it is just and reasonable to hold, that when a member of such society has a remedy, under the rules of his order, from any supposed erroneous action injurious to himself, that he should first exhaust that remedy before appealing to the courts for relief.” See to the same effect, Lindahl v. Supreme Court I. O. F. 100 Minn. *152 87 , , 117 Am.
Peterson v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America 132 N.W. 277 Minn. 1911
Peterson v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America 132 N.W. 277 Minn. 1911
Sartell v. Royal Neighbors of America, 85 Minn. 369 , ; Lindahl v. Supreme Court I. O. F. 100 Minn. 87 , , 117 Am.
O'Connor v. Modern Woodmen of America 124 N.W. 454 Minn. 1910
O'Connor v. Modern Woodmen of America 124 N.W. 454 Minn. 1910
616; Lindahl v. Supreme Court I. O. F., 100 Minn. 87, 95 , , 8 L. R. A. (N. S.) 916, 117 Am.
Kornig v. Western Life Indemnity Co. 112 N.W. 1039 Minn. 1907
Zearfoss v. Switchmen's Union of North America 112 N.W. 1044 Minn. 1907
Kornig v. Western Life Indemnity Co. 112 N.W. 1039 Minn. 1907
In Lindahl v. Supreme Court I. O. F., 100 Minn. 87 , , Mr. Justice Elliott has thus summarized the rules generally accepted on this subject: Where the defense of suicide is asserted against an action by a beneficiary on an insurance policy “(a) the burden of proving that the deceased committed suicide is upon the defendant; (b) the presumption is against
Zearfoss v. Switchmen's Union of North America 112 N.W. 1044 Minn. 1907
The general principles applicable in this class of cases have been stated and applied in several instances by this court, and recently in Lindahl v. Supreme Court I. O. F., 100 Minn. 87 , , and Kornig v. Western Life Indemnity Co., supra, p. 31 , : Where death appears, the law presumes that it results from causes which were not voluntarily brought about by the deceased, and the company is.'