Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Rong v. Haller, 119 N.W. 405.

26 citing documents.

In Re Estate of Meyer 186 N.W.2d 535 Minn. 1971
State, Department of Public Welfare v. Zutz 186 N.W.2d 535 Minn. 1971
State, Department of Public Welfare v. Zutz 186 N.W.2d 535 Minn. 1971
It cites, in support of its contention, In re Will of Brown, *87 32 Minn. 443 , ; Rong v. Haller, 106 Minn. 454 , ; In re Estate of Nelson, 195 Minn. 144 , .
In Re Estate of Meyer 186 N.W.2d 535 Minn. 1971
474 ; Rong v. Haller, 106 Minn. 454 , 119 N.W.
In Re Estate of Nelson 262 N.W. 145 Minn. 1935
First National Bank v. Converse Rubber Co. 262 N.W. 145 Minn. 1935
In Re Estate of Nelson 262 N.W. 145 Minn. 1935
In Rong v. Haller, 106 Minn. 454 , 119 N.W.
First National Bank v. Converse Rubber Co. 262 N.W. 145 Minn. 1935
In Rong v. Haller, 106 Minn. 454 , , it was held error to dismiss an appeal from a decree of the probate court distributing the residue of an estate to a charitable corporation, on the ground that the notice of appeal had not been served on the corporation, but only on the executor.
In Re Estate of Leonard 254 N.W. 594 Minn. 1934
In Re Estate of Leonard 254 N.W. 594 Minn. 1934
*392 In Rong v. Haller, 106 Minn. 454 , , the probate court made a final order allowing the executor’s account and assigned the substance of the estate to a beneficiary named in the will.
In Re Estate of Dean 230 N.W. 584 Minn. 1930
In Re Estate of Dean 230 N.W. 584 Minn. 1930
In re Estate of Jefferson, 167 Minn. 447 , ; Rong v. Haller, 106 Minn. 454 , .
In Re Estate of Osbon 228 N.W. 551 Minn. 1930
In Re Estate of Osbon 228 N.W. 551 Minn. 1930
In re Brown, 32 Minn. 443 , ; Rong v. Haller, 106 Minn. 454 , .
In Re Estate of Jefferson 209 N.W. 267 Minn. 1926
In Re Estate of Jefferson 209 N.W. 267 Minn. 1926
368 ; In re Brown, 32 Minn. 443 , ; Rong v. Haller, 106 Minn. 454 , ; Burmeister v. Gust, 117 Minn. 247 , .
Burns v. Carlaw 189 N.W. 413 Minn. 1922
Burns v. Carlaw 189 N.W. 413 Minn. 1922
Burmeister v. Gust, 117 Minn. 247 , ; Rong v. Haller, 106 Minn. 454 , .
Thwing v. McDonald 165 N.W. 1065 Minn. 1918
Thwing v. McDonald 165 N.W. 1065 Minn. 1918
Rong v. Haller, 106 Minn. 454 , , is not in point.
Kelly v. Kennedy 158 N.W. 395 Minn. 1916
Kelly v. Kennedy 158 N.W. 395 Minn. 1916
There is nothing opposed to this conclusion in Rong v. Haller, 106 Minn. 454 , , where it is held that a notice of appeal from the probate court may be served on the executor, or in Burmeister v. Gust, 117 Minn, 247, , holding that an executor presenting a will for probate may appeal from an order denying it.
State ex rel. Benz v. Probate Court 155 N.W. 906 Minn. 1916
State ex rel. Benz v. Probate Court 155 N.W. 906 Minn. 1916
The motion to dismiss the appeal is denied on the authority of Burmeister v. Gust, 117 Minn. 247 , ; Rong v. Haller, 106 Minn. 454 , , and the authorities referred to in the opinions in those cases.
Burmeister v. Gust 135 N.W. 980 Minn. 1912
Burmeister v. Gust 135 N.W. 980 Minn. 1912
It is therefore his right and his duty to obtain for the instrument the sanction prescribed by law.” Again, at page 575, he says: “He is *250 tbe champion, of the common canse, and charged to keep the lists against all antagonists.” Similarly, in Rong v. Haller, 106 Minn. 454 , , it was held that, under the circumstances shown by the record in that case, a notice of appeal from the probate court, given to the executor, was sufficient: Jaggard, J., saying (at page 457), that the executor was the