Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Sache v. Wallace, 112 N.W. 386.

73 citing documents.

Jackson v. Straabe 185 N.W. 290 Minn. 1921
The precise point made by counsel for defendant is that the part of the judgment determining the title to the property was unauthorized and therefore void within the rule stated and applied in Sache v. Wallace, 101 Minn. 169 , , 11 L.R.A.(N.S.)
Schill v. Korthof 180 N.W. 703 Minn. 1920
Schill v. Korthof 180 N.W. 703 Minn. 1920
Sache v. Wallace, 101 Minn. 169 , , 11 L.R.A.
Gundlach v. Park 165 N.W. 969 Minn. 1918
Gundlach v. Park 165 N.W. 969 Minn. 1918
y included, the court saying: “3udgment by confession entered in vacation must be for the precise amount, neither more nor less, confessed, by the plea of cognovit actionem, otherwise it is void.” In a judgment by confession upon a warrant of attorney the position of the defendant, or judgment debtor, is akin to that of a defendant in a default case, and much of the reasoning in Sache v. Wallace, 101 Minn. 169 , , 11 L.R.A.(N.S.)
Bomsta v. Nelson 163 N.W. 135 Minn. 1917
Bomsta v. Nelson 163 N.W. 135 Minn. 1917
Sache v. Wallace, 101 Minn. 169 , , 11 L.R.A.(N.S.)
State ex rel. Carmody v. Reed 156 N.W. 127 Minn. 1916
State ex rel. Carmody v. Reed 156 N.W. 127 Minn. 1916
Sache v. Wallace, 101 Minn. 169 , , 11 L.R.A.
Ecker v. Ecker 153 N.W. 864 Minn. 1915
Ecker v. Ecker 153 N.W. 864 Minn. 1915
Sache v. Wallace, 101 Minn. 169 , , 11 L.R.A.(N.S.)
Bombolis v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad 150 N.W. 385 Minn. 1914
Bombolis v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad 150 N.W. 385 Minn. 1914
Sache v. Wallace, 101 Minn. 169 , , 11 L.R.A.(N.S.)
Seeger v. Young 149 N.W. 735 Minn. 1914
Seeger v. Young 149 N.W. 735 Minn. 1914
Hence the defendant in a registration proceeding may have all the relief usually available in an action to determine adverse claims wherein he is plaintiff (see Sache v. Wallace, 101 Minn. 169, 170, 178 , , 11 L.R.A.[N.S.]
Smith v. Smith 144 N.W. 138 Minn. 1913
Smith v. Smith 144 N.W. 138 Minn. 1913
354; Sache v. Wallace, 101 Minn. 169, 179 , , 11 L.R.A.(N.S.)
Ordean v. Grannis 136 N.W. 575 Minn. 1912
Ordean v. Grannis 136 N.W. 575 Minn. 1912
There is nothing in Sache v. Wallace, 101 Minn. 169 , , 11 L.R.A.(N.S.)
State ex rel. Hildebrandt v. Fitzgerald 134 N.W. 728 Minn. 1912
State ex rel. Winona Motor Co. v. Minnesota Tax Commission 134 N.W. 643 Minn. 1912
Iltis v. Greengard Bros. 123 N.W. 406 Minn. 1909
Iltis v. Greengard Bros. 123 N.W. 406 Minn. 1909
Sache v. Wallace, 101 Minn. 169 , , 11 L. R. A. (N. S.) 803, 118 Am.