Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Bechtel v. Bechtel, 112 N.W. 883.

32 citing documents.

In Re Estate of Handy 672 N.W.2d 214 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In Re Estate of Handy 672 N.W.2d 214 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
It appears to us that the best rule for determining what the word ‘resident’ means in a given statuto.ry enactment is found in the case of Bechtel v. Bechtel, 101 Minn. 511, 514 , 112 N.W.
Marriage of Berc v. Berc 407 N.W.2d 131 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Berc v. Berc 407 N.W.2d 131 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Bechtel v. Bechtel, 101 Minn. 511, 515 , 112 N.W.
Marriage of Jones v. Jones 402 N.W.2d 146 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Marriage of Jones v. Jones 402 N.W.2d 146 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Davis v. Davis, 297 Minn. 187, 195 , (quoting Bechtel v. Bechtel, 101 Minn. 511, 514 , 112 N.W.
Davidner v. Davidner 232 N.W.2d 5 Minn. 1975
Davidner v. Davidner 232 N.W.2d 5 Minn. 1975
Bechtel v. Bechtel, 101 Minn. 511
Davis v. Davis 210 N.W.2d 221 Minn. 1973
Davis v. Davis 210 N.W.2d 221 Minn. 1973
In Bechtel v. Bechtel, 101 Minn. 511, 514 , we said: “* * * The purpose of statutes authorizing divorces, either absolute or limited, in restricting the right of action to residents of the state, is to prevent nonresidents from coming into our courts with their grievances, and to compel them to resort for relief from matrimonia
Holtberg v. Bommersbach 52 N.W.2d 766 Minn. 1952
Holtberg v. Bommersbach 52 N.W.2d 766 Minn. 1952
Berryhill v. Sepp, supra; Bechtel v. Bechtel, 101 Minn. 511 , , 12 L.R.A.(N.S.)
Chapman v. Davis 45 N.W.2d 822 Minn. 1951
Chapman v. Davis 45 N.W.2d 822 Minn. 1951
Selover v. Probate Court, 130 Minn. 269 , ; Bechtel v. Bechtel, 101 Minn. 511 , , 12 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1100.
In Re Guardianship of Kowalke 46 N.W.2d 275 Minn. 1950
In Re Guardianship of Kowalke 46 N.W.2d 275 Minn. 1950
It appears to us that the best rule for determining what the word "resident" means in a given statutory enactment is found in the case of Bechtel v. Bechtel, 101 Minn. 511, 514 , 112 N.W.
State Ex Rel. Larson v. Larson 252 N.W. 329 Minn. 1934
State Ex Rel. Larson v. Larson 252 N.W. 329 Minn. 1934
Bechtel v. Bechtel, 101 Minn. 511, 514 , , 12 L.R.A.(N.S.)
Brodsky v. Brodsky 215 N.W. 181 Minn. 1927
Brodsky v. Brodsky 215 N.W. 181 Minn. 1927
Williams v. Williams, 101 Minn. 400 , ; Bechtel v. Bechtel, 101 Minn. 511 , , 12 L.R.A.(N.S.)
Hrdlicka v. Hrdlicka 213 N.W. 919 Minn. 1927
Hrdlicka v. Hrdlicka 213 N.W. 919 Minn. 1927
Williams v. Williams, 101 Minn. 400 , ; Bechtel v. Bechtel, 101 Minn. 511 , , 12 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1100; Martinson v. Martinson, 116 Minn. 128 , ; Hertz v. Hertz, 126 Minn. 65 , ; Fitzpatrick v. Fitzpatrick, 127 Minn. 96 , .
State ex rel. Selover v. Probate Court 153 N.W. 520 Minn. 1915
State ex rel. Selover v. Probate Court 153 N.W. 520 Minn. 1915
“As employed in statutory enactments, its meaning, as interpreted by the courts, varies as the legislative intent appears, and in harmony with the subject matter, object and purpose of the statute.” Bechtel v. Bechtel, 101 Minn. 511 , , 12 L.R.A.(N.S.)
Fitzpatrick v. Fitzpatrick 148 N.W. 1074 Minn. 1914
Fitzpatrick v. Fitzpatrick 148 N.W. 1074 Minn. 1914
The evidence brings the case within the rule of Williams v. Williams, 101 Minn. 400 , , and Bechtel v. Bechtel, 101 Minn. 511 , , 12 L.R.A.(N.S.)
Martinson v. Martinson 133 N.W. 460 Minn. 1911
Martinson v. Martinson 133 N.W. 460 Minn. 1911
Marks v. Marks, 62 Minn. 212 , ; Bechtel v. Bechtel, 101 Minn. 511 , , 12 L.R.A.
Berryhill v. Sepp 119 N.W. 404 Minn. 1909
Berryhill v. Sepp 119 N.W. 404 Minn. 1909
That temporary absence of one having a permanent residence to which he expects to return (Lee v. Macfee, 45 Minn. 33 , ), or compulsory absence, as of a wife, does not prevent the retention of “usual place of abode” (Bechtel v. Bechtel, 101 Minn. 511 , , 12 L. R. A. [N. S.] 1100) is not at all inconsistent with the conclusion that the order of the trial court must be affirmed.
State ex rel. Young v. Hays 117 N.W. 615 Minn. 1908
State ex rel. Young v. Hays 117 N.W. 615 Minn. 1908
See Bechtel v. Bechtel, 101 Minn. 511, 515 , , 12 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1100.