Cited by

Co. 104 Minn. 1, 14 , , we recognized that the investment value of a verdict is to be considered in determining the reasonableness of the amount awarded.

Co. 104 Minn. 1 , ; Anderson v. Fielding, 92 Minn. 42 , , 104 A. S. R. 665), granted the motion of William as special administrator of Lillian’s estate to substitute him as plaintiff in the pending personal injury action commenced by her and by amendment to convert it into a statutory action for her wrongfu

Co. 104 Minn. 1 , ; Manwaring v. Drake-Stratton Co. 93 Minn. 497 , , ; Roe v. Winston, 86 Minn. 77 , .

Co. 104 Minn. 1 , 115 N.W.

Co. 104 Minn. 1 , ; Sprague v. Wisconsin Cent.

Co. 104 Minn. 1 , ; Dolge v. Northern Pac.

Co. 104 Minn. 1 , ; Koller v. Chicago, St.

Co. 104 Minn. 1 , ; Dolge v. Northern Pacific Ry.

Co. 104 Minn. 1 , ; Sprague v. Wisconsin Cent.

Co. 104 Minn 1, , but it must be admitted that the accident to young Clay left him in a much more helpless and pitiable state than plaintiff finds himself in, bad as it is.

Co. 104 Minn. 1 , , the question was as to whether a sufficient clearance distance was left between a freight platform and the track, and defendant insisted that this was primarily an engineering proposition.

Co., 104 Minn. 1 , ; Koepsel v. Minneapolis, St.