Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Whitman, 114 N.W. 363.

26 citing documents.

Bryce Dean Dirk, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
While the absence of reference to section 609.05 may not be dispositive, (holding that the defendant may be convicted of aiding and abetting the charged offense even if the charging document only charged him as a principal), Dirk’s plea-hearing transcript confirms that he was not convicted under an aiding-and-abetting theory.
State v. Smith 119 N.W.2d 838 Minn. 1962
State v. Smith 119 N.W.2d 838 Minn. 1962
State v. Korsch, 168 Minn. 354 , ; State v. Baker, 161 Minn. 1 , ; State v. Whitman, 103 Minn. 92 , , Í4 Ann. Cas.
State v. Armstrong 101 N.W.2d 398 Minn. 1960
State v. Armstrong 101 N.W.2d 398 Minn. 1960
State v. Korsch, 168 Minn. 354 , ; State v. Baker, 161 Minn. 1 , ; State v. Whitman, 103 Minn. 92 , , 14 Ann. Cas.
State v. Rasmussen 63 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1954
State v. Rasmussen 63 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 1954
5 State v. Whitman, 103 Minn. 92 , .
State v. Scott 279 N.W. 832 Minn. 1938
State v. Scott 279 N.W. 832 Minn. 1938
State v. Korsch, 168 Minn. 354 , ; State v. Baker, 161 Minn. 1 , ; State v. Whitman, 103 Minn. 92 , , 14 Ann. Cas.
Benson v. Northland Transportation Co. 274 N.W. 532 Minn. 1937
Benson v. Northland Transportation Co. 274 N.W. 532 Minn. 1937
State v. Whitman, 103 Minn. 92, 97 , , 14 Ann. Cas.
Hunter v. State of Arizona 55 P.2d 310 Ariz. 1936
State v. Uglum 222 N.W. 280 Minn. 1928
State v. Uglum 222 N.W. 280 Minn. 1928
G. S. 1923, § 10663; State v. Grimes, 50 Minn. 123 , ; State v. Rue, 72 Minn. 296 , ; State v. Whitman, 103 Minn. 92 , , 14 Ann. Cas.
State v. Kaufman 214 N.W. 785 Minn. 1927
State v. Kaufman 214 N.W. 785 Minn. 1927
State v. Whitman, 103 Minn. 92 , , 14 Ann. Cas.
State v. Demopoulos 210 N.W. 883 Minn. 1926
State v. Demopoulos 210 N.W. 883 Minn. 1926
State v. Whitman, 103 Minn. 92 , , 14 Ann. Cas.
State v. Baker 200 N.W. 815 Minn. 1924
State v. Baker 200 N.W. 815 Minn. 1924
We think there is within the well settled rule as *4 to corroboration of accomplices that “the corroborating evidence is sufficient if, independently of the testimony of the accomplice, it tends in some degree to establish the guilt of the accused; but it need not be sufficiently weighty, standing alone, to make out a prima facie case.” State v. Whitman, 103 Minn. 92 , , 14 Ann. Cas.
State v. Dunn 168 N.W. 2 Minn. 1918
State v. Dunn 168 N.W. 2 Minn. 1918
§ 2457; State v. Lawlor, 28 Minn. 216 , ; State v. Barrett, 40 Minn. 77 , ; State v. Whitman, 103 Minn. 92 , , 14 Ann. Cas.
State v. Christianson 154 N.W. 1095 Minn. 1915
State v. Christianson 154 N.W. 1095 Minn. 1915
State v. Lawlor, 28 Minn. 216 , ; State v. Clements, 82 Minn. 434 , ; Clark v. Clark, 86 Minn. 249 , ; State v. Whitman, 103 Minn. 92 , , 14 Ann. Cas.
State v. Ward 134 N.W. 115 Minn. 1912
State v. Ward 134 N.W. 115 Minn. 1912
State v. Golden, 86 Minn. 206 , ; State v. Whitman, 103 Minn. 92 , , 14 Ann. Cas.