15,456—(202) Precedential Affirmed. Processed

Sherman v. Winona Gas Co.

Minnesota Supreme Court · Filed January 24, 1908 · 114 N.W. 654

Cited by

Engstrom v. Duluth, Missabe & Northern Railway Co. 251 N.W. 134 Minn. 1933
Hillius v. Nelson Hotel Co. Inc. 247 N.W. 385 Minn. 1933
Brecht v. Town of Bergen 235 N.W. 528 Minn. 1931
In re Appeal of Meyer from Confirmation of Paving Assessment 197 N.W. 970 Minn. 1924
State v. Snow 153 N.W. 526 Minn. 1915
Leonard v. Schall 146 N.W. 1104 Minn. 1914
Thomas v. Wisconsin Central Railway Co. 122 N.W. 456 Minn. 1909

Authorities cited

Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.

Gould v. Winona Gas Co. 100 Minn. 258

Opinion text

PER CURIAM. This cause was before us on a former appeal ( 100 Minn. 258 , 111 N. W. 254 , 10 L. R. A. [N. S.] 889), where the legal rights of the parties were establish *519 ed. The cause was remanded and tried a second time, resulting in a verdietfor plaintiffs for $200. Judgment was entered thereon, and defendant appealed. A careful examination of the record discloses no reversible error. No assignment presents any question requiring extended discussion, and we affirm the judgment, with the statement that the record has been fully examined, with the result that no substantial error is shown. Judgment affirmed.