DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted
15,832—(19½) Precedential Affirmed. Processed

McAlpine v. Millen

Minnesota Supreme Court · Filed April 23, 1909 · 120 N.W. 1134

Authorities cited

Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.

Opinion text

PER CURIAM. After the disposition of this case on the former appeal ( 104 Minn. 289 , 116 N. W. 583 ) the plaintiff made a motion for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. The motion was denied, and under the established rule (Bunker v. United Order of Foresters, 97 Minn. 361 , 107 N. W. 392 , and cases therein cited) we cannot, ón this record, say that the court abused its discretion. Affirmed.