Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Thompson v. Baxter, 119 N.W. 797.

27 citing documents.

Hegenes Properties, LLC v. Michelle Rodriguez, John Doe Minn. Ct. App. 2026
79, 80 (1928) (indicating that a tenancy was created solely from the payment and acceptance of monthly rent); -98 (1909) (noting that a tenancy can be created either by a lease agreement or by implication of law).
Juan Cuate v. Pedro Cuate-Dominguez Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Juan Cuate v. Pedro Cuate-Dominguez Minn. Ct. App. 2024
13 (2022); -98 (Minn. 1909) (explaining that a tenancy at will “arise[s] by implication of law .
Chase Rovere v. Clifford Ling Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Chase Rovere v. Clifford Ling Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“An estate for life may be created by express limitation or by a grant in general terms.” (quotation omitted).
Sharon McCrea, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
As a result, he had a “right to reside in the house until McCrea served him with proper written notice of termination of the lease” and “[a]ny and all or al requests or demands of McCrea that Smith move out were not valid terminations of the lease.” “Tenancies at will may be created by express words, or they may arise by implication of law.” Thompson v. Baxter, 107 Minn. 122, 123, 119 N.W.
Turk Trust, LLC, successor-in-interest to LAD, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Thompson v. Baxter , 107 Minn. 122, 123, 119 N.W.
Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald Driggs 884 N.W.2d 621 Minn. 2016
Mary Cocchiarella v. Donald Driggs 884 N.W.2d 621 Minn. 2016
79, 80 (1928) (indicating that' a tenancy was created solely from the payment and acceptance of monthly rent); Thompson v. Baxter, 107 Minn. 122, 123-25 , 119 N.W.
Lee v. Regents of the University of Minnesota 672 N.W.2d 366 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Lee v. Regents of the University of Minnesota 672 N.W.2d 366 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Cf. Thompson v. Baxter, 107 Minn. 122, 124 , 119 N.W.
Trobaugh v. Trobaugh 397 N.W.2d 401 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Trobaugh v. Trobaugh 397 N.W.2d 401 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
Respondents rely heavily on Thompson v. Baxter, 107 Minn. 122 , 119 N.W.
Dvoracek v. Gillies 363 N.W.2d 99 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
Dvoracek v. Gillies 363 N.W.2d 99 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
See, e.g., Thompson v. Baxter, 107 Minn. 122, 125 , 119 N.W.
Birk v. Lane 354 N.W.2d 594 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
Birk v. Lane 354 N.W.2d 594 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
In Thompson v. Baxter, 107 Minn. 122 , 119 N.W.
Martin v. Smith 7 N.W.2d 481 Minn. 1942
Martin v. Smith 7 N.W.2d 481 Minn. 1942
ally prohibited the subletting or occupancy of the second-floor rooms during Edith’s absence, it is evident that the only effect of defendants’ entry and their continued occupancy of the rooms with the guardian’s unauthorized consent was to create a tenancy at will under the rule that “such tenancies arise by implication of law where * * * one * * * enters under a void lease.” Thompson v. Baxter, 107 Minn. 122, 124 , , 21 L.R.A.
Crain v. Baumgartner 256 N.W. 671 Minn. 1934
Crain v. Baumgartner 256 N.W. 671 Minn. 1934
Thompson v. Baxter, 107 Minn. 122 , , 21 L.R.A.(N.S.)
Wiedemann v. Brown 250 N.W. 724 Minn. 1933
Wiedemann v. Brown 250 N.W. 724 Minn. 1933
Thompson v. Baxter, 107 Minn. 122 , , 21 L.R.A.(N.S.)
Fisher v. Heller 219 N.W. 79 Minn. 1928
Fisher v. Heller 219 N.W. 79 Minn. 1928
Van Brunt v. Wallace, 88 Minn. 116 , ; Goodwin v. Clover, 91 Minn. 438 , , 103 A. S. R. 517; Thompson v. Baxter, 107 Minn. 122 , , 21 L.R.A.(N.S.)
Holland Furnace Co. v. Jefferson 216 N.W. 795 Minn. 1927
Holland Furnace Co. v. Jefferson 216 N.W. 795 Minn. 1927
Thompson v. Baxter, 107 Minn. 122 , , 21 L.R.A.(N.S.)