DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Henderson v. Murray, 121 N.W. 214.

31 citing documents.

  • In Re Estate of Vittorio 546 N.W.2d 751 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
  • In Re Estate of Vittorio 546 N.W.2d 751 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
    Knox, 222 Minn. at 482 , d at 229 (quoting Henderson v. Murray, 108 Minn. 76, 79 , 121 N.W.
  • Wilson v. Skogerboe 379 N.W.2d 696 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
  • Wilson v. Skogerboe 379 N.W.2d 696 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
    Henderson v. Murray, 108 Minn. 76, 79 , 121 N.W.
  • First National Bank of St. Paul v. Ramier 311 N.W.2d 502 Minn. 1981
  • Thompson v. Nesheim 159 N.W.2d 910 Minn. 1968
  • Thompson v. Nesheim 159 N.W.2d 910 Minn. 1968
    This court in Henderson v. Murray, 108 Minn. 76, 79 , , 133 A. S. R. 412, 415, substantially adopted the same rule: *417 “* * * [W]here a party obtains the legal title to land by fraud or bad faith, or by taking advantage of confidential or fiduciary relations, or in any other unconscientious manner, so that he cannot justly retain the property
  • Borsgard v. Elverum 80 N.W.2d 604 Minn. 1957
  • Borsgard v. Elverum 80 N.W.2d 604 Minn. 1957
    h transaction wherever a failure to perform a duty to convey would result in unjust enrichment.” In Restatement, Restitution, § 160, the rule is stated as follows: “Where a person holding title to property is subject to an equitable duty to convey it to another on the ground that he would be unjustly enriched if he were permitted to retain it, a constructive trust arises.” In Henderson v. Murray, 108 Minn. 76, 79 , , 133 A. S. R. 412, 415, we said: “* * * wpere a party obtains the legal title to
  • Knox v. Knox 25 N.W.2d 225 Minn. 1946
  • Knox v. Knox 25 N.W.2d 225 Minn. 1946
    In Henderson v. Murray, 108 Minn. 76, 79 , , 133 A. S. R. 412, this court substantially adopted the same rule.
  • Crowley v. Crowley 18 N.W.2d 40 Minn. 1945
  • Crowley v. Crowley 18 N.W.2d 40 Minn. 1945
    As stated in Henderson v. Murray, 108 Minn. 76, 79 , , 133 A. S. R. 412: * * where a party obtains the legal title to land by fraud or bad faith, or by taking advantage of confidential or fiduciary relations, or in any other unconscientious manner, so that he cannot justly retain the property, equity will impress a constructive trust upon it in
  • Roberts v. Friedell 15 N.W.2d 496 Minn. 1944
  • Roberts v. Friedell 15 N.W.2d 496 Minn. 1944
    See, Henderson v. Murray, 108 Minn. 76 , , 133 A. S. R. 412.
  • Whitten v. Wright 289 N.W. 509 Minn. 1939
  • Whitten v. Wright 289 N.W. 509 Minn. 1939
    Henderson v. Murray, 108 Minn. 76 , , 133 A. S. R. 412; Nester v. Gross, 66 Minn. 371 , ; Rollins v. Mitchell, 52 Minn. 41 , , 38 A. S. R. 519.
  • Citizens St. Bank of St. Paul v. Wade 206 N.W. 728 Minn. 1925
  • Citizens St. Bank of St. Paul v. Wade 206 N.W. 728 Minn. 1925
    Where a party “obtains the legal title to land by fraud or bad faith, or by taking advantage of confidential or fiduciary relations, or in any other unconscientious manner, so that he cannot justly retain the property, equity will-impress a constructive trust upon it in favor of the party who is equitably entitled to it.” Henderson v. Murray, 108 Minn. 76 , , 133 Am.
  • Watts v. Lundeen 206 N.W. 444 Minn. 1925
  • Watts v. Lundeen 206 N.W. 444 Minn. 1925
    Niles v. Cooper, 98 Minn. 39 , , 13 L. R. A. (N. S.) 49; Thompson v. Borg, 90 Minn. 209 , ; Henderson v. Murray, 108 Minn. 76 , , 133 Am.
  • Sieger v. Sieger 202 N.W. 742 Minn. 1925
  • Sieger v. Sieger 202 N.W. 742 Minn. 1925
    Henderson v. Murray, 108 Minn. 76, 79 , , 133 Am.
  • Engenmoen v. Lutroe 190 N.W. 894 Minn. 1922
  • Engenmoen v. Lutroe 190 N.W. 894 Minn. 1922
    Mead v. Randall, 68 Minn. 233 , ; Henderson v. Murray, 108 Minn. 76 , , 133 Am.
  • Arnold v. Smith 140 N.W. 748 Minn. 1913
  • Arnold v. Smith 140 N.W. 748 Minn. 1913
    ’s contention that the action to determine adverse claims based on such title, though begun by the Northern Security Company after Smith was discharged as administrator, and the judgment rendered therein, did not divest the right of this plaintiff, the sole devisee, of the right to impress a trust upon the interests obtained by the Northern Security Company may be well taken (Henderson v. Murray, 108 Minn. 76 , , 133 Am.
  • Shearer v. Barnes 136 N.W. 861 Minn. 1912
  • Shearer v. Barnes 136 N.W. 861 Minn. 1912
    Henderson v. Murray, 108 Minn. 76 , , 133 Am.
  • Merritt v. Joyce 135 N.W. 820 Minn. 1912
  • Merritt v. Joyce 135 N.W. 820 Minn. 1912
    And in Henderson v. Murray, 108 Minn. 76 , , 133 Am.