DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Anderson v. Pittsburgh Coal Co., 122 N.W. 794.

28 citing documents.

  • Christy v. Saliterman 179 N.W.2d 288 Minn. 1970
  • Christy v. Saliterman 179 N.W.2d 288 Minn. 1970
    Anderson v. Pittsburgh Coal Co. 108 Minn. 455 , ; Larsen v. Minneapolis Gas Co. 282 Minn. 135 , 163 N. W. (2d) 755 .
  • Berg Ex Rel. Berg v. Johnson 90 N.W.2d 918 Minn. 1958
  • Berg Ex Rel. Berg v. Johnson 90 N.W.2d 918 Minn. 1958
    Jenkins v. Jenkins, 220 Minn. 216 , 19 N. W. (2d) 389 ; Nordberg v. Hall, 116 Minn. 71 , ; Anderson v. Pittsburgh Coal Co. 108 Minn. 455 , ; 26 L.R.A.
  • Jacobson v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co. 22 N.W.2d 455 Minn. 1946
  • Jacobson v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co. 22 N.W.2d 455 Minn. 1946
    Arveson v. Boston Coal Dock & Wharf Co. 128 Minn. 178 , ; Anderson v. Pittsburgh Coal Co. 108 Minn. 455 , , *458 26 L.R.A.
  • Jenkins v. Jenkins 19 N.W.2d 389 Minn. 1945
  • Jenkins v. Jenkins 19 N.W.2d 389 Minn. 1945
    Co. 124 Minn. 1 , , supra; Nordberg v. Hall, 116 Minn. 71 , ; Anderson v. Pittsburgh Coal Co. 108 Minn. 455 , ; Fitzgerald v. International Flax Twine Co. 104 Minn. 138 , ; Hjelm v. Western Granite Contracting Co. 94 Minn. 169 , ; 4 Dunnell, Dig.
  • Piche v. Halvorson 272 N.W. 591 Minn. 1937
  • Piche v. Halvorson 272 N.W. 591 Minn. 1937
    Co. 106 Minn. 77 , ; Anderson v. Pittsburgh Coal Co. 108 Minn. 455 , , 26 L.R.A-(N.S.)
  • Arveson v. Boston Coal Dock & Wharf Co. 150 N.W. 810 Minn. 1915
  • Arveson v. Boston Coal Dock & Wharf Co. 150 N.W. 810 Minn. 1915
    mployees as a means of saving themselves from harm, it becomes the absolute duty of the master to give them, and a failure to do so, though the failure be the neglect of a servant engaged in the common employment, renders the master liable to a servant who is injured in consequence of the neglect.” Elenduck v. Crookston Lumber Co. 121 Minn. 53, 55 , ; Anderson v. Pittsburgh Coal Co. 108 Minn. 455, 466 , , 26 L.R.A.(N.S.)
  • Hanson v. Red Wing Sewer Pipe Co. 142 N.W. 804 Minn. 1913
  • Hanson v. Red Wing Sewer Pipe Co. 142 N.W. 804 Minn. 1913
    The facts bring the case directly within our decisions in Anderson v. Northern Mills Co. 42 Minn. 424 , ; Anderson v. Pittsburgh Coal Co. 108 Minn. 455 , , 26 L.R.A.(N.S.)
  • Elenduck v. Crookston Lumber Co. 140 N.W. 125 Minn. 1913
  • Elenduck v. Crookston Lumber Co. 140 N.W. 125 Minn. 1913
    The trial court was guided in so submitting the case by the decisions of this court in Anderson v. Pittsburgh Coal Co. 108 Minn. 455 , , 26 L.R.A.(N.S.)
  • Burke v. Ash 139 N.W. 705 Minn. 1913
  • Burke v. Ash 139 N.W. 705 Minn. 1913
    ment of the load, then failure to give such warning would be negligence for which these defendants are liable.” The court- had previously ruled that the pleadings and evidence presented no other ground of recovery by plaintiff, and was guided -in submitting the case as stated by the decisions of this court in Berneche v. Hilliard, 101 Minn. 366 , , and Anderson v. Pittsburg Coal Co. 108 Minn. 455, 467 , , 26 L.R.A.(N.S.)
  • Wickstrom v. Whitney 136 N.W. 1099 Minn. 1912
  • Wickstrom v. Whitney 136 N.W. 1099 Minn. 1912
    Anderson v. Pittsburgh Coal Co. 108 Minn. 455 , , 26 L.R.A.(N.S.)
  • Mortenson v. Hotel Nicollet Co. 136 N.W. 306 Minn. 1912
  • Mortenson v. Hotel Nicollet Co. 136 N.W. 306 Minn. 1912
    The duty of the master is to warn the servant of impending danger caused by an independent act performed for the master’s business, and of perils resulting from the fact that a safe place becomes dangerous through the work there carried on.” This is substantially the same language used by this court in Anderson v. Pittsburg Coal Co. 108 Minn. 455 , , 26 L.R.A.(N.S.)
  • Penas v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. 127 N.W. 926 Minn. 1910
  • Penas v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. 127 N.W. 926 Minn. 1910
    339 : “This rule is obviously founded on the great principle of social duty that every man in the management of his own affairs, whether by himself or by his agents or servants, shall so conduct them as not to injure another; and if he does not, and another thereby sustains damage, he shall answer for it.” See Anderson v. Pittsburgh Coal Co., 108 Minn. 455, 463 , .
  • Hirsch v. Bayne 127 N.W. 389 Minn. 1910
  • Duff v. Bayne 127 N.W. 385 Minn. 1910
  • Duff v. Bayne 127 N.W. 385 Minn. 1910
    Anderson v. Pittsburgh Coal Co., 108 Minn. 455 , .
  • Hirsch v. Bayne 127 N.W. 389 Minn. 1910
    Co., 103 Minn. 120 , ; Fitzgerald v. International Flax Twine Co., 104 Minn. 138 , ; Raitila v. Consumers Ore Co., 107 Minn. 91 , ; Anderson v. Pittsburgh Coal Co., 108 Minn. 455 , .