Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State ex rel. Mudeking v. Parr, 123 N.W. 408.

34 citing documents.

State v. Hartmann 681 N.W.2d 690 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Hartmann 681 N.W.2d 690 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
In Wright, our conclusion that there is no fundamental right to sell farm products was supported by reference to State v. Parr, 109 Minn. 147, 152 , 123 N.W.
State v. Wright 588 N.W.2d 166 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
State v. Wright 588 N.W.2d 166 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Mudeking v. Parr, 109 Minn. 147, 152 , 123 N.W.
State v. Schmidt 159 N.W.2d 113 Minn. 1968
State v. Schmidt 159 N.W.2d 113 Minn. 1968
Mudeking v. Parr, 109 Minn. 147 , .
Excelsior Baking Co. v. City of Northfield 77 N.W.2d 188 Minn. 1956
Excelsior Baking Co. v. City of Northfield 77 N.W.2d 188 Minn. 1956
Mudeking v. Parr, 109 Minn. 147, 150 , .
Hassler v. Engberg 48 N.W.2d 343 Minn. 1951
Hassler v. Engberg 48 N.W.2d 343 Minn. 1951
Mudeking v. Parr, 109 Minn. 147 , , 134 A. S. R. 759; State v. Minnesota Farmers Mut.
General Mills, Inc. v. Division of Employment & Security 28 N.W.2d 847 Minn. 1947
General Mills, Inc. v. Division of Employment & Security 28 N.W.2d 847 Minn. 1947
Mudeking v. Parr, 109 Minn. 147 , , 134 A. S. R. 759; State v. Minnesota Farmers Mut.
State v. Minnesota Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n 15 N.W.2d 568 Minn. 1944
State v. Minnesota Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n 15 N.W.2d 568 Minn. 1944
Mudeking v. Parr, 109 Minn. 147, 152 , , 134 A. S. R. 759; In re Improvement of Third Street, 185 Minn. 170 , .
Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Commissioner of Taxation 12 N.W.2d 625 Minn. 1943
Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Commissioner of Taxation 12 N.W.2d 625 Minn. 1943
Mude-king v. Parr, 109 Minn. 147, 152 , , 134 A. S. R. 759; In re Improvement of Third Street, 185 Minn. 170 , .
State v. Pehrson 287 N.W. 313 Minn. 1939
State v. Pehrson 287 N.W. 313 Minn. 1939
Mudeking v. Parr, 109 Minn. 147 , , 134 A. S. R. 759.
National Tea Co. v. State 286 N.W. 360 Minn. 1939
National Tea Co. v. State 286 N.W. 360 Minn. 1939
Mudeking v. Parr, 109 Minn. 147, 152 , , 134 A. S. R. 759; In re Improvement ■of Third Street, 185 Minn. 170 , .
State Ex Rel. Youngquist v. Common School District No. 78 230 N.W. 115 Minn. 1930
State Ex Rel. Youngquist v. Common School District No. 78 230 N.W. 115 Minn. 1930
Mudeking v. Parr, 109 Minn. 147 , , 134 A. S. R. 759; Lowry v. Scott, 110 Minn. 98 , ; State ex rel.
In Re Application of Humphrey 227 N.W. 179 Minn. 1929
In Re Application of Humphrey 227 N.W. 179 Minn. 1929
Mudeking v. Parr, 109 Minn. 147 , , 134 A. S. R. 759; State ex rel.
State v. Pocock 201 N.W. 610 Minn. 1925
State v. Pocock 201 N.W. 610 Minn. 1925
v. Parr, 109 Minn. 147 , , 134 Am.
Dohs v. Holm 189 N.W. 418 Minn. 1922
Dohs v. Holm 189 N.W. 418 Minn. 1922
State v. Parr, 109 Minn. 147 , , 134 Am.
Fairley v. City of Duluth 185 N.W. 390 Minn. 1921
Fairley v. City of Duluth 185 N.W. 390 Minn. 1921
565; State v. Parr, 109 Minn. 147 , , 134 Am.
State v. Minnesota Farmers Mutual Insurance 176 N.W. 756 Minn. 1920
State v. Minnesota Farmers Mutual Insurance 176 N.W. 756 Minn. 1920
Co. v. County of Martin, 104 Minn, 179, ; State v. Parr, 109 Minn. 147 , , 134 Am.
State ex rel. Greenwood v. Ramage 123 N.W. 823 Minn. 1909
State ex rel. Greenwood v. Ramage 123 N.W. 823 Minn. 1909
554; but, following the decision of this court in State v. Parr, supra, page 147, , the exemption from its provisions of “vendors of farm produce or of green fruits and vegetables” makes the ordinance invalid, and the order discharging the relator is affirmed.