DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Bruer v. Bruer, 123 N.W. 813.

34 citing documents.

  • Piche v. Independent School District No. 621 634 N.W.2d 193 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
  • Piche v. Independent School District No. 621 634 N.W.2d 193 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
    Bruer v. Bruer, 109 Minn. 260, 264 , 123 N.W.
  • Dietz v. Dietz 70 N.W.2d 281 Minn. 1955
  • Dietz v. Dietz 70 N.W.2d 281 Minn. 1955
    9 In Bruer v. Bruer, 109 Minn. 260 , , 28 L.R.A.(N.S.)
  • Klick v. Fearing 55 N.W.2d 594 Minn. 1952
  • Klick v. Fearing 55 N.W.2d 594 Minn. 1952
    Bruer v. Bruer, 109 Minn. 260 , , 28 L.R.A.
  • Roske v. Ilykanyics 45 N.W.2d 769 Minn. 1951
  • Roske v. Ilykanyics 45 N.W.2d 769 Minn. 1951
    In Bruer v. Bruer, 109 Minn. 260, 265 , , 28 L.R.A.(N.S.)
  • Manemann v. West 13 N.W.2d 474 Minn. 1944
  • Manemann v. West 13 N.W.2d 474 Minn. 1944
    Allen v. Allen, 204 Minn. 395 , ; Bruer v. Bruer, 109 Minn. 260 , , 28 L.R.A.(N.S.)
  • Priebe v. Sette 267 N.W. 376 Minn. 1936
  • Priebe v. Sette 267 N.W. 376 Minn. 1936
    As said in Bruer v. Bruer, 109 Minn. 260, 265 , , 28 L.R.A.
  • Malicki v. Malicki 248 N.W. 723 Minn. 1933
  • Malicki v. Malicki 248 N.W. 723 Minn. 1933
    This was also the case in Bruer v. Bruer, 109 Minn. 260 , , 28 L.R.A.(N.S.)
  • Gamble v. Mosloski 246 N.W. 368 Minn. 1933
  • Gamble v. Mosloski 246 N.W. 368 Minn. 1933
    We construe the “conditions” of the deed as an agreement, secured by a lien but personal to the grantors, for their support, under the rule of Bruer v. Bruer, 109 Minn. 260 , , 28 L.R.A.(N.S.)
  • Johnson v. Johnson 238 N.W. 483 Minn. 1931
  • Johnson v. Johnson 238 N.W. 483 Minn. 1931
    Doescher v. Spratt, 61 Minn. 826 , ; Childs v. Rue, 84 Minn. 323 , ; Johnson v. Paulson, 103 Minn. 158 , ; Bruer v. Bruer, 109 Minn. 260 , , 28 L.R.A.(N.S.)
  • Dose v. Dose 214 N.W. 769 Minn. 1927
  • Dose v. Dose 214 N.W. 769 Minn. 1927
    Bruer v. Bruer, 109 Minn. 260 , , 28 L.R.A.(N.S.)
  • Carson v. Carson 209 N.W. 507 Minn. 1926
  • Carson v. Carson 209 N.W. 507 Minn. 1926
    Walsh v. Walsh, 144 Minn. 182 , ; Bruer v. Bruer, 109 Minn. 260 , , 28 L. R. A. (N. S.) 608.
  • Sovell v. First National Bank 209 N.W. 22 Minn. 1926
  • Sovell v. First National Bank 209 N.W. 22 Minn. 1926
    The subject was thoroughly gone into in Bruer v. Bruer, 109 Minn. 260 , , 28 L. R. A. (N. S.) 608, and on the authority of Minneapolis T. M. Co. v. Hanson, 101 Minn. 260 , , 118 Am.
  • Davidson v. Minnesota Loan & Trust Co. 197 N.W. 833 Minn. 1924
  • Davidson v. Minnesota Loan & Trust Co. 197 N.W. 833 Minn. 1924
    In addition to the above see Little Falls Water Power Co. v. Mahan, 69 Minn. 253 , ; Johnson v. Paulson, 103 Minn. 158 , ; Bruer v. Bruer, 109 Minn. 260 , , 28 L. R. A. (N. S.) 608; Furst v. Lacher, 149 Minn. 53 , .
  • Walsh v. Walsh 174 N.W. 835 Minn. 1919
  • Walsh v. Walsh 174 N.W. 835 Minn. 1919
    Bruer v. Bruer, 109 Minn. 260 , , 28 L.R.A.(N.S.)
  • Emkee v. Ahston 166 N.W. 1079 Minn. 1918
  • Emkee v. Ahston 166 N.W. 1079 Minn. 1918
    Bruer v. Bruer, 109 Minn. 260 , , 28 L.R.A.
  • Penas v. Cherveny 161 N.W. 150 Minn. 1917
  • Penas v. Cherveny 161 N.W. 150 Minn. 1917
    We think this contract should be construed under the rule stated in Bruer v. Bruer, 109 Minn. 260, 265 , , 28 L.R.A.(N.S.)
  • O'Rourke v. O'Rourke 153 N.W. 607 Minn. 1915
  • O'Rourke v. O'Rourke 153 N.W. 607 Minn. 1915
    On the other hand, where it appears, as in this case, that there has been *296 such a repudiation of the contract and failure in the performance thereof as to amount practically to a failure of consideration for the deed, the remedy should he applied.” In Bruer v. Bruer, 109 Minn. 260 , , 28 L.R.A.(N.S.)