Cited by

In Estabrook v. City of Duluth, 142 Minn. 318, 320 , , where the area surrounding a knot in a wood paving block had worn down from a depth of Vz inch to Wz inches, this court quoted with approval the applicable principles set forth in Leystrom v. City of Ada, 110 Minn. 340, 343 , , as follows: “* * * It is impossible for this court to prescribe exact limitations from which, in all cases, it may be determined what character of defect in a public street constitutes negligence on the part of the mu

1 Plaintiffs cite the following cases as controlling: Shepstedt v. Hayes, supra; Williams v. John A. Stees Co. Inc. 172 Minn. 35 , ; Leystrom v. City of Ada, 110 Minn. 340 , .

Paul, 87 Minn. 35 , ; Estabrook v. City of Duluth, 142 Minn. 318 , ; McGandy v. City of Marshall, 178 Minn. 326 , ; Leystrom v. City of Ada, 110 Minn. 340 , ; Sumner v. City of Northfield, 96 Minn. 107 , .

Leystrom v. City of Ada, 110 Minn. 340 , ; Davies v. Village of Madelia, 205 Minn. 526 , .

Leystrom v. City of Ada, 110 Minn. 340 , ; Powers v. Village of Mechanicville, 163 App. Div. 138 , 148 N. Y. S. 452.

It seems to me that when the charge is considered as a whole in this respect, the jury could not have been misled as to the duty resting upon the city with respect to caring for its streets, and in my opinion this later statement to the jury, though somewhat loosely put, did not in any way influence the verdict.” To this we might add the statement of this court in Leystrom v. City of Ada, 110 Minn. 340, 343 , , 508: “It is impossible for this court to prescribe exact limitations from which, in a

Paul, 87 Minn. 35 , ; Sumner v. City of Northfield, 96 Minn. 107 , ; Leystrom v. City of Ada, 110 Minn. 340 , ; Hufman v. City of Crookston, 113 Minn. 232 , ; Fortmeyer v. National Biscuit Co. 116 Minn. 158 , , 37 L.R.A.(N.S.)

Paul, 87 Minn. 35 , ; Leystrom v. City of Ada, 110 Minn. 340 , 125 N. W. *328 507; Fortmeyer v. National Biscuit Co. 116 Minn. 158 , , 37 L.R.A.

(2 ed.) § 10327(b), and cases cited; Bernick v. McClure, 107 Minn. 9 , ; Smith & Nixon Piano Co. v. Lydick, 110 Minn. 82 , ; Leystrom v. City of Ada, 110 Minn. 340 , .

Leystrom v. City of Ada, 110 Minn. 340 , ; Allen v. Eneroth, 118 Minn. 476 , ; Snelling State Bank v. Clasen, 132 Minn. 404 , , 6 A. L. R. 1663.

However, under the holding in Sumner v. City of Northfield, 96 Minn. 107 , , and in Leystrom v. City of Ada, 110 Minn. 340 , , we think the showing warranted the submission of that question to the jury.

In Leystrom v. City of Ada, 110 Minn. 340 , , the plaintiff caught the heel of her shoe in a hole 1% inches wide and 5 inches long at the place where a cement walk joined a wooden walk.

Paul, 87 Minn. 35 , ; Sumner v. City of Northfield, 96 Minn. 107 , ; Leystrom v. City of Ada, 110 Minn. 340 , .

Bernick v. McClure, 107 Minn. 9 , ; Leystrom v. City of Ada, 110 Minn. 340 , ; Allen v. Eneroth, 118 Minn. 476 , .

Leystrom v. City of Ada, 110 Minn. 340 , .

Leystrom v. City of Ada, 110 Minn. 340 , .