Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Kandelin v. City of Ely, 124 N.W. 449.

26 citing documents.

Olander v. Sperry and Hutchinson Company 197 N.W.2d 438 Minn. 1972
Olander v. Sperry and Hutchinson Company 197 N.W.2d 438 Minn. 1972
In an early case, Kandelin v. City of Ely, 110 Minn. 55, 58 , the court defined the purpose of the statute as follows: “The object of the statute in requiring notices of this kind is to furnish the municipal officers information of the time and place of an accident and the nature of the injuries received, to the end that due investigation may be
Grams v. Independent School District No. 742 176 N.W.2d 536 Minn. 1970
Grams v. Independent School District No. 742 176 N.W.2d 536 Minn. 1970
The purpose of the notice, as we held in Kandelin v. City of Ely, 110 Minn. 55, 58 , , is— “* * * to furnish the municipal officers information of the time and place of an accident and the nature of the injuries received, to the end that due investigation may be made to determine the truth and merits of the claims made.
American Automobile Insurance v. City of Minneapolis 107 N.W.2d 320 Minn. 1961
American Automobile Insurance v. City of Minneapolis 107 N.W.2d 320 Minn. 1961
Paul, 80 Minn. 415 , ; Kandelin v. City of Ely, 110 Minn. 55 , ; Anderson v. City of Minneapolis, 138 Minn. 350 , .
Brittain v. City of Minneapolis 84 N.W.2d 646 Minn. 1957
Brittain v. City of Minneapolis 84 N.W.2d 646 Minn. 1957
Kandelin v. City of Ely, 110 Minn. 55 , ; Lyons v. City of Red Wing, 76 Minn. 20 , ; O’Brien v. City of St.
Hebert v. Village of Hibbing 212 N.W. 186 Minn. 1927
Hebert v. Village of Hibbing 212 N.W. 186 Minn. 1927
Paul, supra; Kandelin v. City of Ely, 110 Minn. 55 , ; Harder v. City of Minneapolis, 40 Minn. 446 , .
McClain v. City of Duluth 203 N.W. 776 Minn. 1925
McClain v. City of Duluth 203 N.W. 776 Minn. 1925
The ruling in Kandelin v. City of Ely, 110 Minn. 55 , , and Anderson v. City of Minneapolis, 138 Minn. 350 , , leads to the conclusion that the description of the place of the accident was not too indefinite and uncertain.
Hampton v. City of Duluth 168 N.W. 20 Minn. 1918
Hampton v. City of Duluth 168 N.W. 20 Minn. 1918
Anderson v. City of Minneapolis, 138 Minn. 350 , ; Weber v. City of Minneapolis, 132 Minn. 170 , ; Ackeret v. City of Minneapolis, 129 Minn. 190 , ; Smith v. City of Cloquet, 120 Minn. 50 , ; Larkin v. City of Minneapolis, 112 Minn. 311 , ; Kandelin v. City of Ely, 110 Minn. 55 , .
Weber v. City of Minneapolis 156 N.W. 287 Minn. 1916
Weber v. City of Minneapolis 156 N.W. 287 Minn. 1916
Kandelin v. City of Ely¿ 110 Minn. 55 , .
Murphy v. City of St. Paul 153 N.W. 619 Minn. 1915
Murphy v. City of St. Paul 153 N.W. 619 Minn. 1915
Kandelin v. City of Ely, 110 Minn. 55 , , and cases cited; Larkin v. City of Minneapolis, 112 Minn. 311 , , and cases cited.
Ackeret v. City of Minneapolis 151 N.W. 976 Minn. 1915
Ackeret v. City of Minneapolis 151 N.W. 976 Minn. 1915
Paul, 80 Minn. 415 , ; Terryll v. City of Faribault, 81 Minn. 519 , ; Terryll v. City of Faribault, 84 Minn. 341 , ; Kandelin v. City of Ely, 110 Minn. 55 , ; Larkin v. City of Minneapolis, 112 Minn. 311 , ; Wornecka v. City of St.
Smith v. City of Cloquet 139 N.W. 141 Minn. 1912
Smith v. City of Cloquet 139 N.W. 141 Minn. 1912
Kandelin v. City of Ely, 110 Minn. 55 , .
Larkin v. City of Minneapolis 127 N.W. 1129 Minn. 1910
Larkin v. City of Minneapolis 127 N.W. 1129 Minn. 1910
Paul, 80 Minn. 415 , ; Kandelin v. City of Ely, 110 Minn. 55 , .
Kennedy v. City of Montgomery 127 N.W. 1134 Minn. 1910
Kennedy v. City of Montgomery 127 N.W. 1134 Minn. 1910
It is governed on both points by Kandelin v. City of Ely, 110 Minn. 55, , distinguishing Olcott v. City of St.