Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Knutsen v. Krook, 127 N.W. 11.

30 citing documents.

Iverson v. Johnson 81 N.W.2d 701 Minn. 1957
In Re Estate of Dahl 249 Minn. 156 Minn. 1957
In Re Estate of Dahl 249 Minn. 156 Minn. 1957
Knutsen v. Krook, 111 Minn. 352 , 127 N.W.
Iverson v. Johnson 81 N.W.2d 701 Minn. 1957
Knutsen v. Krook, 111 Minn. 352 , ; In re Estate of Peterson, 202 Minn. 31 , .
Minnesota Odd Fellows Home v. Pogue 73 N.W.2d 615 Minn. 1955
Minnesota Odd Fellows Home v. Pogue 73 N.W.2d 615 Minn. 1955
Benedict v. Steinhauser (C. C. D. Minn.) 179 F. 137 ; Knutsen v. Krook, 111 Minn. 352 , , 20 Ann. Cas.
Schunk v. Hotchkiss 43 N.W.2d 104 Minn. 1950
Schunk v. Hotchkiss 43 N.W.2d 104 Minn. 1950
See, § 525.411; Pittsburgh Coal Co. v. Will, 209 Minn. 340 , ; Knutsen v. Krook, 111 Minn. 352 , , 20 Ann. Cas.
Wheeler v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States 1 N.W.2d 593 Minn. 1942
Wheeler v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States 1 N.W.2d 593 Minn. 1942
Knutsen v. Krook, 111 Minn. 352, 357 , , 20 Ann. Cas.
In Re Estate of Devenney 256 N.W. 104 Minn. 1934
Aetna Life Insurance v. Cairney 256 N.W. 104 Minn. 1934
Aetna Life Insurance v. Cairney 256 N.W. 104 Minn. 1934
The situation of the case at bar is controlled by the following language from Knutsen v. Krook, 111 Minn. 352, 355 , , 20 Ann. Cas.
In Re Estate of Devenney 256 N.W. 104 Minn. 1934
The situation of the case at bar is controlled by the following language from Knutsen v. Krook, 111 Minn. 352 , 355 , 127 N.W.
In Re Estate of Nelson 231 N.W. 218 Minn. 1930
In Re Estate of Nelson 231 N.W. 218 Minn. 1930
Knutsen v. Krook, 111 Minn. 352 , , 20 Ann. Cas.
A. L. Goetzmann Co. v. Gazett 214 N.W. 895 Minn. 1927
A. L. Goetzmann Co. v. Gazett 214 N.W. 895 Minn. 1927
See Winston v. Young, 52 Minn. 1 , ; Knutsen v. Krook, 111 Minn. 352 , , 20 Ann. Cas.
Radichel v. Federal Surety Co. 212 N.W. 171 Minn. 1927
Radichel v. Federal Surety Co. 212 N.W. 171 Minn. 1927
Knutsen v. Krook, 111 Minn. 352 , , 20 Ann. Cas.
In Re Estate of Jefferson 209 N.W. 267 Minn. 1926
In Re Estate of Jefferson 209 N.W. 267 Minn. 1926
Timm v. Brauch, 133 Minn. 20 , , does not hold that a written notice given by one person in a litigation sets the time for appeal running as to all, nor does *452 Knutsen v. Krook, 111 Minn. 352 , , 20 Ann. Cas.
O'Brien v. Lien 199 N.W. 914 Minn. 1924
O'Brien v. Lien 199 N.W. 914 Minn. 1924
Plaintiff’s right under her antenuptial contract is not a “claim” under section 7326, G. S. 1913; Knutsen v. Krook, 111 Minn. 352, 357 , , 20 Ann. Cas.
Patterson v. Hall 192 N.W. 342 Minn. 1923
Patterson v. Hall 192 N.W. 342 Minn. 1923
Knutson v. Krook, 111 Minn. 352 , , 29 Ann. Cas.
Hayford v. Daugherty 174 N.W. 442 Minn. 1919
Hayford v. Daugherty 174 N.W. 442 Minn. 1919
The case of Knutsen v. Krook, 111 Minn. 352 , , 20 Ann. Cas.
Timm v. Brauch 157 N.W. 709 Minn. 1916
Timm v. Brauch 157 N.W. 709 Minn. 1916
It provides: “No appeal shall be effectual for any purpose unless the following requisites are complied with by the appellant within thirty days after notice of the order, judgment or decree appealed from: * * * But no appeal from an order, judgment or decree shall be taken after six months from the entry thereof.” In Knutsen v. Krook, 111 Minn. 352 , , 20 Ann. Cas.