Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Lewis v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co., 127 N.W. 180.
- Mechler v. McMahon 230 N.W. 776 Minn. 1930
-
Mechler v. McMahon
230 N.W. 776
Minn. 1930
Co. 111 Minn. 509 , ; Knudson v. G. N. Ry.
- Aubin v. Duluth Street Railway Co. 211 N.W. 580 Minn. 1926
-
Aubin v. Duluth Street Railway Co.
211 N.W. 580
Minn. 1926
Co. 111 Minn. 509 , ; Gilbert v. City of Tracy, 115 Minn. 443 , ; Green v. G. N. Ry.
- Montcalm v. Great Northern Railway Co. 208 N.W. 539 Minn. 1926
-
Montcalm v. Great Northern Railway Co.
208 N.W. 539
Minn. 1926
Co. 111 Minn. 509 , ; Griffith v. G. N. Ry.
- McDonald v. Great Northern Railway Co. 207 N.W. 194 Minn. 1926
- McDonald v. Great Northern Railway Co. 207 N.W. 194 Minn. 1926
- McCarty v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. 191 N.W. 819 Minn. 1923
-
McCarty v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.
191 N.W. 819
Minn. 1923
Co. 111 Minn. 509 , ; Weiss v. Great Northern Ry.
- Praught v. Great Northern Railway Co. 185 N.W. 965 Minn. 1921
- Praught v. Great Northern Railway Co. 185 N.W. 965 Minn. 1921
- Falk v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. 157 N.W. 904 Minn. 1916
- Falk v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. 157 N.W. 904 Minn. 1916
- Rademacher v. Pioneer Tractor Manufacturing Co. 149 N.W. 24 Minn. 1914
-
Rademacher v. Pioneer Tractor Manufacturing Co.
149 N.W. 24
Minn. 1914
Co. 111 Minn. 509, 511 , .
- Hutchins v. Sleepy Eye Telephone Co. 147 N.W. 279 Minn. 1914
-
Hutchins v. Sleepy Eye Telephone Co.
147 N.W. 279
Minn. 1914
Co. 111 Minn. 509 , ; Knudson v. Great Northern Ry.
- Green v. Great Northern Railway Co. 143 N.W. 722 Minn. 1913
-
Green v. Great Northern Railway Co.
143 N.W. 722
Minn. 1913
Co. 111 Minn. 509 , : “The undisputed evidence must, clearly and fully rebut every reasonable presumption that he was.
- Hagen v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. 143 N.W. 121 Minn. 1913
-
Hagen v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.
143 N.W. 121
Minn. 1913
Co. 111 Minn. 509 , ; Evans v. Drake & Stratton Co. 119 Minn. 55 , , which involve situations analogous to the one here presented.
- Koski v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. 133 N.W. 790 Minn. 1911
-
Koski v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.
133 N.W. 790
Minn. 1911
Co. 111 Minn. 509 , , and Keenan v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co. supra, page 107, .
- Gilbert v. City of Tracy 132 N.W. 752 Minn. 1911
- Gilbert v. City of Tracy 132 N.W. 752 Minn. 1911
- Griffith v. Great Northern Railway Co. 129 N.W. 152 Minn. 1910
- Griffith v. Great Northern Railway Co. 129 N.W. 152 Minn. 1910
- Schoen v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co. 127 N.W. 433 Minn. 1910
- Schoen v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co. 127 N.W. 433 Minn. 1910