Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Macomber v. Kinney, 128 N.W. 1001.

42 citing documents.

Stone v. Jetmar Properties, LLC 733 N.W.2d 480 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Stone v. Jetmar Properties, LLC 733 N.W.2d 480 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Macomber v. Kinney, 114 Minn. 146, 156-57 , 128 N.W.
West Concord Conservation Club, Inc. v. Chilson 306 N.W.2d 893 Minn. 1981
West Concord Conservation Club, Inc. v. Chilson 306 N.W.2d 893 Minn. 1981
The key issue in this case is whether estoppel will bar the Conservation Club from denying the authority of Plevke to convey “Mill Tract.” In support of their assertion that the Conservation Club should be estopped, defendants rely on the case of Macomber v. Kinney, 114 Minn. 146 , 128 N.W.
Village of Wells v. Layne-Minnesota Co. 60 N.W.2d 621 Minn. 1953
Village of Wells v. Layne-Minnesota Co. 60 N.W.2d 621 Minn. 1953
8 Dimond v. Manheim, 61 Minn. 178 , ; Macomber v. Kinney, 114 Minn. 146 , , ; Nell v. Dayton, 43 Minn. 242 , ; St.
Johnson v. Giese 42 N.W.2d 712 Minn. 1950
Johnson v. Giese 42 N.W.2d 712 Minn. 1950
Clarke v. Milligan, 58 Minn. 413 , ; cf. Chadbourn v. Williams, 45 Minn. 294 , ; Macomber v. Kinney, 114 Minn. 146 , , ; Froslee v. Sonju, 209 Minn. 522 , .
Fidelity Acceptance Corporation v. House 297 N.W. 705 Minn. 1941
Fidelity Acceptance Corporation v. House 297 N.W. 705 Minn. 1941
45 C. J. p. 383; Macomber v. Kinney, 114 Minn. 146 , , affirmed on reargument, ; State v. Provencher, 129 Minn. 409 , .
Froslee v. Sonju 297 N.W. 1 Minn. 1941
Froslee v. Sonju 297 N.W. 1 Minn. 1941
Macomber v. Kinney, 114 Minn. 146 , , .
Conner v. Caldwell 294 N.W. 650 Minn. 1940
Conner v. Caldwell 294 N.W. 650 Minn. 1940
Macomber v. Kinney, 114 Minn. 146 , , .
Leighton v. Bancamerica-Blair Corp. 256 N.W. 848 Minn. 1934
Leighton v. Bancamerica-Blair Corp. 256 N.W. 848 Minn. 1934
Macomber v. Kinney, 114 Minn. 146, 154 , , ; Dimond v. Manheim, 61 Minn. 178, 182 , .
Gostomezik v. Gostomezik 253 N.W. 36 Minn. 1934
Gostomezik v. Gostomezik 253 N.W. 36 Minn. 1934
229 ; Macomber v. Kinney, 114 Minn. 146 , 128 N.W.
Groves v. Byrnes 231 N.W. 926 Minn. 1930
Groves v. Byrnes 231 N.W. 926 Minn. 1930
Macomber v. Kinney, 114 Minn. 146 , , .
Johnson v. Christlieb 225 N.W. 927 Minn. 1929
Johnson v. Christlieb 225 N.W. 927 Minn. 1929
Coleman v. Pearce, 26 Minn. 123 , ; Dimond v. Manheim, 61 Minn. 178 , ; Theobald v. Hopkins, 93 Minn. 253 , ; Macomber v. Kinney, 114 Minn. 146 , , 130 *
Smith v. Chaffee 224 N.W. 458 Minn. 1929
Smith v. Chaffee 224 N.W. 458 Minn. 1929
An “estoppel can be invoked only by the innocent.” Macomber v. Kinney, 114 Minn. 146, 154 , , .
Riethmuller v. Burton 222 N.W. 929 Minn. 1929
Riethmuller v. Burton 222 N.W. 929 Minn. 1929
Dimond v. Manheim, 61 Minn. 178 , ; Macomber v. Kinney, 114 Minn. 146 , , 130 * Friend v. Friend, 158 Minn. 31 , ; Schaefer v. Nylin, 162 Minn. 170 , .
Schaefer v. Nylin 202 N.W. 439 Minn. 1925
Schaefer v. Nylin 202 N.W. 439 Minn. 1925
v. Gray, 61 Minn. 242 , ; Macomber v. Kinney, 114 Minn. 146, 155 , , ; Purcell v. Thornton, 128 Minn. 255 , .
Dr. Ward's Medical Co. v. Wolleat 199 N.W. 738 Minn. 1924
Dr. Ward's Medical Co. v. Wolleat 199 N.W. 738 Minn. 1924
Macomber v. Kinney, 114 Minn. 146 , , ; Kirby v. Union Pac.
St. Denis v. Mullen 196 N.W. 258 Minn. 1923
St. Denis v. Mullen 196 N.W. 258 Minn. 1923
Macomber v. Kinney, 114 Minn. 146 , , .
Ashbaugh v. Wright 188 N.W. 157 Minn. 1922
Ashbaugh v. Wright 188 N.W. 157 Minn. 1922
2l C. J. 1150, note 90; 10 R. C. L. p. 770, note 19; Macomber v. Kinney, 114 Minn. 146 , , .
Havel v. Costello 175 N.W. 1001 Minn. 1920
Havel v. Costello 175 N.W. 1001 Minn. 1920
Macomber v. Kinney, 114 Minn. 146 , , ; Niles v. Cooper, 98 Minn. 39 , , 13 L.R.A.(N.S.)
Nesland v. Eddy 154 N.W. 661 Minn. 1915
Nesland v. Eddy 154 N.W. 661 Minn. 1915
The defendant, upon the record, cannot assert that he was without notice, nor does he assert that he gave value; nor is he in position to claim an estoppel within Macomber v. Kinney, 114 Minn. 146 , , , and cases cited.
Helmer v. Shevlin-Mathieu Lumber Co. 151 N.W. 421 Minn. 1915
Helmer v. Shevlin-Mathieu Lumber Co. 151 N.W. 421 Minn. 1915
The cases of Macomber v. *29 Kinney, 114 Minn. 146 , , , and Purcell v. Thornton, 128 Minn. 255 , , do not help defendant.
Purcell v. Thornton 150 N.W. 899 Minn. 1915
Purcell v. Thornton 150 N.W. 899 Minn. 1915
274 , 17 L. ed. 536, quoted by Mr. Justice Jaggard in Macomber v. Kinney, 114 Minn. 146 , , .