Viers v. Perry
Cited by
- Clarke & Simmons, Inc. v. Rule 185 N.W. 947 Minn. 1921
- Stockhaus v. Lind 183 N.W. 844 Minn. 1921
- Hurni v. Johnson 177 N.W. 942 Minn. 1920
- Minneapolis Gaslight Co. v. City of Minneapolis 143 N.W. 728 Minn. 1913
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- First National Bank v. Randall 38 Minn. 382
- State v. Madigan 66 Minn. 10
- Stai v. Selden 87 Minn. 271
- First State Bank v. Schatz 104 Minn. 425
- McAllister v. St. Paul City Railway Co. 116 N.W. 917
Opinion text
Per Curiam. This appeal presents the sole question whether the trial court erred by its order granting the defendant’s motion to dissolve the *349 writ of attachment herein. The motion was made and opposed upon conflicting affidavits, which show no clear preponderance of proof opposed to the decision of the trial court. The case, then, falls within the rule that the determination of a question of fact, on the hearing of a motion on affidavits, will not be reversed, if there be evidence reasonably tending to support it. First Nat. Bank v. Randall, 38 Minn. 382 , 37 N. W. 799 ; State v. Madigan, 66 Minn. 10 , 68 N. W. 179 ; Stai v. Selden, 87 Minn. 271, 275 , 92 N. W. 6 ; First State Bank v. Schatz, 104 Minn. 425 , 116 N. W. 917 . Order affirmed.