Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Clark, 131 N.W. 369.

39 citing documents.

State v. Zecher 128 N.W.2d 83 Minn. 1964
State v. Zecher 128 N.W.2d 83 Minn. 1964
The question of whether a new trial should be granted is also before us. State v. Clark, 114 Minn. 342 , ; State v. Cole, 240 Minn. 52 , 59 N. W. (2d) 919 .
State v. Jones 124 N.W.2d 727 Minn. 1963
State v. Jones 124 N.W.2d 727 Minn. 1963
1 See, State v. Clark, 114 Minn. 342 , .
State v. Schwartz 122 N.W.2d 769 Minn. 1963
State v. Schwartz 122 N.W.2d 769 Minn. 1963
In State v. Clark, 114 Minn. 342, 344 , , this court said with reference to the duties and obligations of prosecuting officers: “* * * He is not bound to make his argument to the jury colorless, or argue both sides of the case, if the defendant is represented by counsel; but he may present forcibly the state’s side of the case.
State v. Gress 84 N.W.2d 616 Minn. 1957
State v. Gress 84 N.W.2d 616 Minn. 1957
1 State v. Clark, 114 Minn. 342 , .
State v. Reardon 73 N.W.2d 192 Minn. 1955
State v. Reardon 73 N.W.2d 192 Minn. 1955
Cf. State v. Clark, 114 Minn. 342 , .
State v. Pavlovich 71 N.W.2d 173 Minn. 1955
State v. Pavlovich 71 N.W.2d 173 Minn. 1955
State v. Clark, 114 Minn. 342 , .
State v. Gulbrandsen 57 N.W.2d 419 Minn. 1953
State v. Gulbrandsen 57 N.W.2d 419 Minn. 1953
See extensive comments on this matter in State v. Clark, 114 Minn. 342 , 131 N.W.
State v. Haney 23 N.W.2d 369 Minn. 1946
State v. Haney 23 N.W.2d 369 Minn. 1946
Consequently, improper suggestions, insinuations and, especially, assertions of personal knowledge are apt to carry much weight against the accused when they should properly carry none.” *131 In State v. Clark, 114 Minn. 342, 344 , , the same thought was expressed in the following language: “* * * The duties and obligations of a prosecuting officer are not simply those of an attorney in a civil action; for behind him, and largely at his command, are all the forces of organized society.
State v. Schabert 15 N.W.2d 585 Minn. 1944
State v. Schabert 15 N.W.2d 585 Minn. 1944
In State v. Clark, *Page 10 114 Minn. 342 , 344 , 131 N.W.
State v. Palmer 288 N.W. 160 Minn. 1939
State v. Palmer 288 N.W. 160 Minn. 1939
§ 7102 (see note 69 thereunder) ; State v. Clark, 114 Minn. 342 , ; State v. Peterson, 153 Minn. 310 , ; State v. Boice, 157 Minn. 374 , .
State v. Klashtorni 225 N.W. 278 Minn. 1929
State v. Klashtorni 225 N.W. 278 Minn. 1929
State v. Clark, 114 Minn. 342 , ; State v. Nelson, 148 Minn. 285 , , and cases cited.
State v. Boice 196 N.W. 483 Minn. 1923
State v. Boice 196 N.W. 483 Minn. 1923
Sometimes the rule is transgressed to influence the jury, as in State v. Clark, 114 Minn. 342 , , and State v. Bernstein, 148 Minn. 301 , , and sometimes for the purpose of affecting an impartial review by this court of the decision of the trial court, as in State v. Schomaker, 149 Minn. 141 , .
State v. Friend 191 N.W. 926 Minn. 1923
State v. Peterson 190 N.W. 345 Minn. 1922
State v. Peterson 190 N.W. 345 Minn. 1922
State v. Clark, 114 Minn. 342 , ; State v. Bernstein, 148 Minn. 301 , ; State v. Kampert, 139 Minn. 132 , .
State v. Duddy 188 N.W. 261 Minn. 1922
State v. Duddy 188 N.W. 261 Minn. 1922
State v. Clark, 114 Minn. 342 , .
State v. Morehart 183 N.W. 960 Minn. 1921
State v. McKinley, 114 Minn. 434 , .
State v. Bernstein 181 N.W. 947 Minn. 1921
State v. Bernstein 181 N.W. 947 Minn. 1921
No matter how guilty a defendant may in his own opinion be, he is bound to see that no conviction shall take place except in strict conformity to law.” In State v. Clark, 114 Minn. 342 , , the same thought was expressed in the f ollowing language: “The duties and obligations of a prosecuting officer are not simply those of an attorney in a civil action; for behind him, and largely at his command, are all the forces of organized society.
State v. Nelson 181 N.W. 850 Minn. 1921
State v. Nelson 181 N.W. 850 Minn. 1921
The cross-examination was characterized by attempts to discredit the defendant “by sneers and innuendo,” a method disapproved in State v. Clark, 114 Minn. 342 , .
State v. Couplin 178 N.W. 486 Minn. 1920
State v. Couplin 178 N.W. 486 Minn. 1920
It is dangerously near transgressing the admonition given in State v. Clark, 114 Minn. 342, 345 , , namely, for the prosecuting attorney to abstain from expressing his own opinion as to a defendant’s guilt.
State v. Wassing 169 N.W. 485 Minn. 1918
State v. Wassing 169 N.W. 485 Minn. 1918
We do not understand that the court in State v. Clark, 114 Minn. 342 , , intended to adopt any different rule.
State v. Johnson 131 N.W. 629 Minn. 1911
The case does not come within State v. Fournier, 108 Minn. 402 , , where the effort to prejudice the jury against the defendant was flagrant, and in the face of adverse ruling *496 of the court, nor within State v. Clark, supra, page 342, .