DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Naeseth v. Hommedal, 123 N.W. 287.

26 citing documents.

  • Schaub v. Kortgard 372 N.W.2d 427 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • Schaub v. Kortgard 372 N.W.2d 427 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    Naeseth v. Hommedal, 109 Minn. 153 , 123 N.W.
  • Norlander v. Cronk 221 N.W.2d 108 Minn. 1974
  • Norlander v. Cronk 221 N.W.2d 108 Minn. 1974
    Naeseth v. Hommedal, 109 Minn. 153 , [1909]; Ashton v. Thompson, 32 Minn. 25 , [1884] ; Prescott v. Johnson, 91 Minn. 273 , [1904] ; Fischer v. Sperl, 94 Minn. 421 , [1905] ; Shevlin v. Shevlin, 96 Minn. 398 , [1905].’’ Agner v. Bourn, 281 Minn. 385, 390 , .
  • Agner v. Bourn 161 N.W.2d 813 Minn. 1968
  • Agner v. Bourn 161 N.W.2d 813 Minn. 1968
    Naeseth v. Hommedal, 109 Minn. 153 , ; Ashton v. Thompson, 32 Minn. 25 , ; Prescott v. Johnson, 91 Minn. 273 , ; *391 Fischer v. Sperl, 94 Minn. 421 , ; Shevlin v. Shevlin, 96 Minn. 398 , .
  • Sorlie v. Thomas 51 N.W.2d 592 Minn. 1952
  • Sorlie v. Thomas 51 N.W.2d 592 Minn. 1952
    See, also, Naeseth v. Hommedal, 109 Minn. 153 , ; Hafner v. Schmitz, 215 Minn. 245 , 9 N. W. (2d) 713 .
  • Hafner v. Schmitz 9 N.W.2d 713 Minn. 1943
  • Hafner v. Schmitz 9 N.W.2d 713 Minn. 1943
    One of these rules is that where “confidential relations exist between parties and one of them by means of the relation secures from the other an inequitable advantage, equity will set aside the transaction.” Claggett v. Claggett, supra, *250 at 204 Minn. p. 572, 284 N. W. p. 365; Fischer v. Sperl, 94 Minn. 421 , ; Naeseth v. Hommedal, 109 Minn. 153 , .
  • Claggett v. Claggett 284 N.W. 363 Minn. 1939
  • Claggett v. Claggett 284 N.W. 363 Minn. 1939
    Ashton v. Thompson, 32 Minn. 25 , ; Prescott v. Johnson, 91 Minn. 273 , ; Fischer v. Sperl, 94 Minn. 421 , ; Shevlin v. Shevlin, 96 Minn. 398 , ; Naeseth v. Hommedal, 109 Minn. 153 , .
  • Olson v. Chicago-Lake State Bank 204 N.W. 926 Minn. 1925
  • Olson v. Chicago-Lake State Bank 204 N.W. 926 Minn. 1925
    Barnabas Hospital v. Minneapolis International Electric Co. 68 Minn. 254 -257, , 40 L. R. A. 388; Naeseth v. Hommedal, 109 Minn. 153 -157, .
  • Merchants Trust & Savings Bank v. Schudel 169 N.W. 795 Minn. 1918
  • Merchants Trust & Savings Bank v. Schudel 169 N.W. 795 Minn. 1918
    Naeseth v. Hommedal, 109 Minn. 153 , ; Thill v. Freiermuth, 139 Minn. 78 , .
  • Shaughnessy v. Shaughnessy 160 N.W. 769 Minn. 1916
  • Shaughnessy v. Shaughnessy 160 N.W. 769 Minn. 1916
    Naeseth v. Hommedal, 109 Minn. 153 , .
  • Thill v. Freiermuth 156 N.W. 260 Minn. 1916
  • Thill v. Freiermuth 156 N.W. 260 Minn. 1916
    In re Storer’s Will, 28 Minn. 9 , 8 N W. 827; Fischer v. Sperl, 94 Minn. 421 , 103 N W. 502; Naeseth v. Hommedal, 109 Minn. 153 , ; Buck v. Buck, 122 Minn. 463 , .
  • Staples v. East St. Paul State Bank 142 N.W. 721 Minn. 1913
  • Staples v. East St. Paul State Bank 142 N.W. 721 Minn. 1913
    Naeseth v. Hommedal, 109 Minn. 153 , ; Peterson v. City of Red Wing, 101 Minn. 62 , ; 1 Dunnell, Minn. Dig.
  • Lindquist v. Gibbs 142 N.W. 156 Minn. 1913
  • Lindquist v. Gibbs 142 N.W. 156 Minn. 1913
    Butler v. Bohn, 31 Minn. 325 , ; Wagner v. Nagel, 33 Minn. 348 , ; Conlan v. Grace, 36 Minn. 276 , ; Coggins v. Higbie, 83 Minn. 83 , ; Fitchette v. Victoria Land Co. 93 Minn. 485 , ; Naeseth v. Hommedal, 109 Minn. 153 , ; Moriarty v. Maloney, 121 Minn. 285 , .
  • McEleney v. Donovan 138 N.W. 306 Minn. 1912
  • McEleney v. Donovan 138 N.W. 306 Minn. 1912
    86 , , said: “There is no reason for not applying the familiar rule that the party who seeks to set aside a solemn instrument like a deed on the ground of fraud or undue influence, which is a species of fraud, has the burden of proof.” Such is also the rule in Prescott v. Johnson, 91 Minn. 273 , ; Rader v. Rader, 108 Minn. 139 , , and Naeseth v. Hommedal, 109 Minn. 153 , .