DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Decker v. Itasca Paper Co., 127 N.W. 183.

28 citing documents.

  • Senogles v. Carlson 902 N.W.2d 38 Minn. 2017
  • Senogles v. Carlson 902 N.W.2d 38 Minn. 2017
    realize the risk” of playing near a pile of ash); Decker v. Itasca Paper Co., 111 Minn. 439 , 127 N.W.
  • Toetschinger v. Ihnot 250 N.W.2d 204 Minn. 1977
  • Toetschinger v. Ihnot 250 N.W.2d 204 Minn. 1977
    See, Capriotti v. Beck, 264 Minn. 39 , Watts v. Erickson, 244 Minn. 264 , Thomsen v. Reibel, 212 Minn. 83 , Decker v. Itasca Paper Co. 111 Minn. 439 , Rule 49.01(2), Rules of Civil Procedure, provides as follows: “In actions involving Minn. Stat. 1971, Sec.
  • Doren ex rel. Doren v. Northwestern Baptist Hospital Ass'n 60 N.W.2d 361 Minn. 1953
  • Doren ex rel. Doren v. Northwestern Baptist Hospital Ass'n 60 N.W.2d 361 Minn. 1953
    Decker v. Itasca Paper Co. 111 Minn. 439 , ; Mattson v. Minnesota & North Wisconsin R. Co. supra.
  • Eckhardt v. Hanson 264 N.W. 776 Minn. 1936
  • Eckhardt v. Hanson 264 N.W. 776 Minn. 1936
    Peter R. Co. 39 Minn. 164, 169 , , 12 A. S. R. 626, Justice Mitchell stated: “But the authorities are all one way, and to the effect that even a child is bound to use such reasonable care as one of his age and mental capacity is capable of using; and his failure to do so is negligence.” In Decker v. Itasca Paper Co. 111 Minn. 439 , , under the facts there disclosed, it was held that a boy of five years *273 was not negligent as a matter of law and a quaere was made as to the question now raised.
  • Jenson v. Glemaker 263 N.W. 624 Minn. 1935
  • Jenson v. Glemaker 263 N.W. 624 Minn. 1935
    Mattson v. M. & N. W. R. Co. 98 Minn. 296 , ; Decker v. Itasca Paper Co. 111 Minn. 439 , ; Anderson v. Anderson, 188 Minn. 602 , .
  • Luck v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 254 N.W. 609 Minn. 1934
  • Luck v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 254 N.W. 609 Minn. 1934
    Mattson v. Minnesota & N. W. R. Co. 98 Minn. 296 , ; Decker v. Itasca Paper Co. 111 Minn. 439 , .
  • Anderson v. Anderson 248 N.W. 35 Minn. 1933
  • Anderson v. Anderson 248 N.W. 35 Minn. 1933
    Mattson v. M. & N. W. R. Co. 98 Minn. 296 , Decker v. Itasca Paper Co. 111 Minn. 439 , .
  • Borowski v. Sargent 246 N.W. 540 Minn. 1933
  • Borowski v. Sargent 246 N.W. 540 Minn. 1933
    Decker v. Itasca Paper Co. 111 Minn. 439 , ; Hannula v. D. & I. R. R. Co. 130 Minn. 3 , ; Hughes v. Minneapolis St.
  • Hollander v. Dietrich 232 N.W. 630 Minn. 1930
  • Hollander v. Dietrich 232 N.W. 630 Minn. 1930
    In Decker v. Itasca Paper Co. 111 Minn. 439 , , it was held that a boy five years and three months old was not negligent as a matter of law.
  • Luther v. Dornack 229 N.W. 784 Minn. 1930
  • Luther v. Dornack 229 N.W. 784 Minn. 1930
    Co. 49 Minn. 263 , ; Decker v. Itasca Paper Co. 111 Minn. 439 , ; Hughes v. Minneapolis St.
  • Converse v. Adleman 190 N.W. 340 Minn. 1922
  • Converse v. Adleman 190 N.W. 340 Minn. 1922
    Decker v. Itasca Paper Co. 111 Minn. 439 , ; Hannula v. Duluth & I. R. R. Co., 130 Minn. 3 , .
  • Kokesh v. Price 161 N.W. 715 Minn. 1917
  • Kokesh v. Price 161 N.W. 715 Minn. 1917
    Mattson v. Minnesota & N. W. R. Co. 98 Minn. 296 , ; Decker v. Itasca Paper Co. 111 Minn. 439 , .
  • Hannula v. Duluth & Iron Range Railroad 153 N.W. 250 Minn. 1915
  • Hannula v. Duluth & Iron Range Railroad 153 N.W. 250 Minn. 1915
    In Decker v. Itasca Paper Co. 111 Minn. 439 , , the court, in an opinion written by Mr. Justice Brown, the present Chief Justice, held that the boy there concerned, who was five years and three months of age at the time of his injury, was as a matter of law not chargeable with negligence.
  • Dahl v. Valley Dredging Co. 145 N.W. 796 Minn. 1914
  • Dahl v. Valley Dredging Co. 145 N.W. 796 Minn. 1914
    Co. 47 Minn. 161 , ; Decker v. Itasca Paper Co. 111 Minn. 439, 440 , ; Berg v. B. B. Fuel Co. 122 Minn. 323 , .