DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Clark, 131 N.W. 369.

39 citing documents.

  • State v. Zecher 128 N.W.2d 83 Minn. 1964
  • State v. Zecher 128 N.W.2d 83 Minn. 1964
    The question of whether a new trial should be granted is also before us. State v. Clark, 114 Minn. 342 , ; State v. Cole, 240 Minn. 52 , 59 N. W. (2d) 919 .
  • State v. Jones 124 N.W.2d 727 Minn. 1963
  • State v. Jones 124 N.W.2d 727 Minn. 1963
    1 See, State v. Clark, 114 Minn. 342 , .
  • State v. Schwartz 122 N.W.2d 769 Minn. 1963
  • State v. Schwartz 122 N.W.2d 769 Minn. 1963
    In State v. Clark, 114 Minn. 342, 344 , , this court said with reference to the duties and obligations of prosecuting officers: “* * * He is not bound to make his argument to the jury colorless, or argue both sides of the case, if the defendant is represented by counsel; but he may present forcibly the state’s side of the case.
  • State v. Gress 84 N.W.2d 616 Minn. 1957
  • State v. Gress 84 N.W.2d 616 Minn. 1957
    1 State v. Clark, 114 Minn. 342 , .
  • State v. Reardon 73 N.W.2d 192 Minn. 1955
  • State v. Reardon 73 N.W.2d 192 Minn. 1955
    Cf. State v. Clark, 114 Minn. 342 , .
  • State v. Pavlovich 71 N.W.2d 173 Minn. 1955
  • State v. Pavlovich 71 N.W.2d 173 Minn. 1955
    State v. Clark, 114 Minn. 342 , .
  • State v. Gulbrandsen 57 N.W.2d 419 Minn. 1953
  • State v. Gulbrandsen 57 N.W.2d 419 Minn. 1953
    See extensive comments on this matter in State v. Clark, 114 Minn. 342 , 131 N.W.
  • State v. Haney 23 N.W.2d 369 Minn. 1946
  • State v. Haney 23 N.W.2d 369 Minn. 1946
    Consequently, improper suggestions, insinuations and, especially, assertions of personal knowledge are apt to carry much weight against the accused when they should properly carry none.” *131 In State v. Clark, 114 Minn. 342, 344 , , the same thought was expressed in the following language: “* * * The duties and obligations of a prosecuting officer are not simply those of an attorney in a civil action; for behind him, and largely at his command, are all the forces of organized society.
  • State v. Schabert 15 N.W.2d 585 Minn. 1944
  • State v. Schabert 15 N.W.2d 585 Minn. 1944
    In State v. Clark, *Page 10 114 Minn. 342 , 344 , 131 N.W.
  • State v. Palmer 288 N.W. 160 Minn. 1939
  • State v. Palmer 288 N.W. 160 Minn. 1939
    § 7102 (see note 69 thereunder) ; State v. Clark, 114 Minn. 342 , ; State v. Peterson, 153 Minn. 310 , ; State v. Boice, 157 Minn. 374 , .
  • State v. Klashtorni 225 N.W. 278 Minn. 1929
  • State v. Klashtorni 225 N.W. 278 Minn. 1929
    State v. Clark, 114 Minn. 342 , ; State v. Nelson, 148 Minn. 285 , , and cases cited.
  • State v. Boice 196 N.W. 483 Minn. 1923
  • State v. Boice 196 N.W. 483 Minn. 1923
    Sometimes the rule is transgressed to influence the jury, as in State v. Clark, 114 Minn. 342 , , and State v. Bernstein, 148 Minn. 301 , , and sometimes for the purpose of affecting an impartial review by this court of the decision of the trial court, as in State v. Schomaker, 149 Minn. 141 , .
  • State v. Friend 191 N.W. 926 Minn. 1923
  • State v. Peterson 190 N.W. 345 Minn. 1922
  • State v. Peterson 190 N.W. 345 Minn. 1922
    State v. Clark, 114 Minn. 342 , ; State v. Bernstein, 148 Minn. 301 , ; State v. Kampert, 139 Minn. 132 , .
  • State v. Duddy 188 N.W. 261 Minn. 1922
  • State v. Duddy 188 N.W. 261 Minn. 1922
    State v. Clark, 114 Minn. 342 , .
  • State v. Morehart 183 N.W. 960 Minn. 1921
    State v. McKinley, 114 Minn. 434 , .
  • State v. Bernstein 181 N.W. 947 Minn. 1921
  • State v. Bernstein 181 N.W. 947 Minn. 1921
    No matter how guilty a defendant may in his own opinion be, he is bound to see that no conviction shall take place except in strict conformity to law.” In State v. Clark, 114 Minn. 342 , , the same thought was expressed in the f ollowing language: “The duties and obligations of a prosecuting officer are not simply those of an attorney in a civil action; for behind him, and largely at his command, are all the forces of organized society.
  • State v. Nelson 181 N.W. 850 Minn. 1921
  • State v. Nelson 181 N.W. 850 Minn. 1921
    The cross-examination was characterized by attempts to discredit the defendant “by sneers and innuendo,” a method disapproved in State v. Clark, 114 Minn. 342 , .
  • State v. Couplin 178 N.W. 486 Minn. 1920
  • State v. Couplin 178 N.W. 486 Minn. 1920
    It is dangerously near transgressing the admonition given in State v. Clark, 114 Minn. 342, 345 , , namely, for the prosecuting attorney to abstain from expressing his own opinion as to a defendant’s guilt.
  • State v. Wassing 169 N.W. 485 Minn. 1918
  • State v. Wassing 169 N.W. 485 Minn. 1918
    We do not understand that the court in State v. Clark, 114 Minn. 342 , , intended to adopt any different rule.
  • State v. Johnson 131 N.W. 629 Minn. 1911
    The case does not come within State v. Fournier, 108 Minn. 402 , , where the effort to prejudice the jury against the defendant was flagrant, and in the face of adverse ruling *496 of the court, nor within State v. Clark, supra, page 342, .