Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Yoder, 130 N.W. 10.

23 citing documents.

Bogen v. Bogen 261 N.W.2d 606 Minn. 1977
Bogen v. Bogen 261 N.W.2d 606 Minn. 1977
See, e. g., State v. Yoder, 113 Minn. 503 , 130 N.W.
In Re Appeal of O'Rourke 246 N.W.2d 461 Minn. 1976
In Re Appeal of O'Rourke 246 N.W.2d 461 Minn. 1976
State v. Yoder, 113 Minn. 503 , *375 (1911).
Davis v. Industrial Commission 353 P.2d 627 Ariz. 1960
In Re Estate of Kinkead 57 N.W.2d 628 Minn. 1953
Seeley v. Erringer 57 N.W.2d 628 Minn. 1953
In Re Estate of Kinkead 57 N.W.2d 628 Minn. 1953
State v. Yoder, 113 Minn. 503 , 130 N.W.
Seeley v. Erringer 57 N.W.2d 628 Minn. 1953
State v. Yoder, 113 Minn. 503 , , L. R. A. 1916C, 686; see, Reynolds v. Reynolds, 171 Minn. 340 , .
Kugling v. Williamson 42 N.W.2d 534 Minn. 1950
Kugling v. Williamson 42 N.W.2d 534 Minn. 1950
See, State v. Yoder, 113 Minn. 503 , , L. R. A. 1916C, 686.
State of Arizona v. Pass 121 P.2d 882 Ariz. 1942
Northrup v. St. Paul Fire Department Relief Ass'n 259 N.W. 185 Minn. 1935
Northrup v. St. Paul Fire Department Relief Ass'n 259 N.W. 185 Minn. 1935
State v. Yoder, 113 Minn. 503 , , L. R. A. 1916C, 686, settles beyond dispute that from the time the marriage ceremony between plaintiff and Sutton was performed October 23, 1924, until the judgment declaring the marriage null and void, plaintiff’s status was that of Sutton’s wife.
In Re Estate of Ommang 235 N.W. 529 Minn. 1931
In Re Estate of Ommang 235 N.W. 529 Minn. 1931
*98 The case of State v. Yoder, 113 Minn. 503 , , L. R. A. 1916C, 686, is of interest here.
State v. Richards 221 N.W. 867 Minn. 1928
State v. Richards 221 N.W. 867 Minn. 1928
In State v. Yoder, 113 Minn. 503, 505 , , L. R. A. 1916C, 686, it was held that where a marriage is absolutely, void and therefore a nullity ab initio its validity may be impeached in any court, whether the question arises directly or collaterally, but that, quoting Schouler, Domestic Relations, § 14, “a voidable marriage is valid for al
Reynolds v. Reynolds 214 N.W. 650 Minn. 1927
Vanderburgh v. Vanderburgh 188 N.W. 276 Minn. 1922
Vanderburgh v. Vanderburgh 188 N.W. 276 Minn. 1922
Adams v. Adams, 25 Minn. 72 ; Roll v. Roll, 51 Minn. 353 , ; *193 McAllen v. Hodge, 94 Minn. 237 , ; State v. Yoder, 113 Minn. 503 , , L. R. A. 1916C, 686; Klampe v. Klampe, 137 Minn. 227 , .
State ex rel. Graves v. Haugen 145 N.W. 167 Minn. 1914
State ex rel. Graves v. Haugen 145 N.W. 167 Minn. 1914
See State v. Yoder, 113 Minn. 503 , .