DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Slingerland v. Slingerland, 132 N.W. 326.

24 citing documents.

  • Distinguished In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2026
    It is also distinguishable from Kremer, where wife received no alimony or spousal maintenance under the antenuptial agreement, d at 628, where the antenuptial agreement left the wife “penniless.” We conclude that, under the facts of this case, the spousal maintenance and house awarded to wife under the antenuptial agreement sufficiently provides for wife and 3 Wife also challenges the district court’s findings that husband “a
  • In re the Estate of Margaret Peteler Bush, a/k/a Margaret Bush Minn. Ct. App. 2024
  • In re the Estate of Margaret Peteler Bush, a/k/a Margaret Bush Minn. Ct. App. 2024
    (determining that consideration was “pitifully inadequate” where husband and wife had been married 20 years, had four living children at the time of husband’s death, and enforcing the agreement would leave the wife “penniless”).
  • Kremer v. Kremer 912 N.W.2d 617 Minn. 2018
  • Kremer v. Kremer 912 N.W.2d 617 Minn. 2018
    See Kinney , d at 122-23 (discussing Slingerland v. Slingerland , 115 Minn. 270 , 132 N.W.
  • In Re the Estate of Kinney 733 N.W.2d 118 Minn. 2007
  • In Re the Estate of Kinney 733 N.W.2d 118 Minn. 2007
    For instance, in Slingerland v. Slinger-land, we addressed three questions: (1) whether the agreement was the product of fraud, undue influence, or duress; (2) whether the consideration was adequate; and (3) whether the spouse challenging the agreement knew “the extent, character, *123 and value of [her husband’s] property and the nature and extent of her rights as his wife and widow.” 115 Minn. 270, 273-75 , 132 N.W.
  • Marriage of Rudbeck v. Rudbeck 365 N.W.2d 330 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
  • Marriage of Rudbeck v. Rudbeck 365 N.W.2d 330 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
    In order to overcome this presumption, the proponent, not contestant, must “show there was no fraud or concealment, and that [the other party] knew the extent, character, and value of his property and the nature and extent of her rights as his wife and widow.” Slingerland v. Slingerland, 115 Minn. 270, 275 , 132 N.W.
  • Marriage of Hill v. Hill 356 N.W.2d 49 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
  • Marriage of Hill v. Hill 356 N.W.2d 49 Minn. Ct. App. 1984
    At common law, to overcome the presumption of fraud, the proponent, not the contestant, has the burden of showing “there was no fraud or concealment, and that [the other party] knew the extent, character and value of his property and the nature and extent of her rights as his wife and widow.” Slingerland v. Slingerland, 115 Minn. 270, 275 , 132 N.W.
  • Estate of Serbus v. Serbus 324 N.W.2d 381 Minn. 1982
  • Estate of Serbus v. Serbus 324 N.W.2d 381 Minn. 1982
    Slingerland v. Slingerland, 115 Minn. 270 , 132 N.W.
  • Independent School District No. 700 v. City of Duluth 170 N.W.2d 116 Minn. 1969
  • Independent School District No. 700 v. City of Duluth 170 N.W.2d 116 Minn. 1969
    This court rejected the theory that a city council could exert any authority or purport to act in any manner beyond its authorized territory, stating ( 115 Minn. 270 , 132 N.W.
  • Gartner v. Gartner 74 N.W.2d 809 Minn. 1956
  • Gartner v. Gartner 74 N.W.2d 809 Minn. 1956
    8 Slingerland v. Slingerland, 115 Minn. 270 , .
  • Welsh v. Welsh 184 N.W. 38 Minn. 1921
  • Welsh v. Welsh 184 N.W. 38 Minn. 1921
    563; Slingerland v. Slingerland, 115 Minn. 270 , ; Malchow v. Malchow, 143 Minn. 53 , .
  • Malchow v. Malchow 172 N.W. 915 Minn. 1919
  • Malchow v. Malchow 172 N.W. 915 Minn. 1919
    If influence is acquired, it must be kept free from the taint of selfish interests * * * and overreaching bargains.” These principles have been applied by this court to cases involving contracts: Ashton v. Thompson, 32 Minn. 25, ; Shevlin v. Shevlin, 96 Minn. 398 , ; Slingerland v. Slingerland, 115 Minn. 270 , ; to the case of a will procured by undue influence, Fischer v. Sperl, 94 Minn. 421 , , and to a case involving the assent of a wife to the provisions made for her by her husband’s will.
  • McCaughey v. Wilson 153 N.W. 310 Minn. 1915
  • McCaughey v. Wilson 153 N.W. 310 Minn. 1915
    The litigation involving this ante-nuptial agreement is reported in this court in Slingerland v. Slingerland, 115 Minn. 270 , , and 109 Minn. 407 , .
  • Minnesota Land & Immigration Co. v. Munch 136 N.W. 1026 Minn. 1912
    115 Minn. 360 , ; 115 Minn. 536 , .