Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Peters v. City of Duluth, 137 N.W. 390.

26 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent/Cross-Appellant v. Bonnie Ann Lindquist, Appellant/Cross-Respondent. 869 N.W.2d 863 Minn. 2015
State of Minnesota, Respondent/Cross-Appellant v. Bonnie Ann Lindquist, Appellant/Cross-Respondent. 869 N.W.2d 863 Minn. 2015
The Remedies Clause “relates primarily to the assertion of affirmative rights.” Peters v. City of Duluth, 119 Minn. 96, 105 , 137 N.W.
Denman v. Gans 607 N.W.2d 788 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Denman v. Gans 607 N.W.2d 788 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Peters v. City of Duluth, 119 Minn. 96, 105 , 137 N.W.
Hersh Properties, LLC v. McDonald's Corp. 588 N.W.2d 728 Minn. 1999
Hersh Properties, LLC v. McDonald's Corp. 588 N.W.2d 728 Minn. 1999
Peters v. Duluth, 119 Minn. 96, 98 , 137 N.W.
Breimhorst v. Beckman 35 N.W.2d 719 Minn. 1949
Breimhorst v. Beckman 35 N.W.2d 719 Minn. 1949
Peters v. City of Duluth (1912) 119 Minn. 96 , , 41 L.R.A.(N.S.)
Carl v. Detoffol 25 N.W.2d 479 Minn. 1946
Carl v. Detoffol 25 N.W.2d 479 Minn. 1946
Peters v. City of Duluth, 119 Minn. 96 , , 41 L.R.A.(N.S.)
Glassman v. Radke 188 N.W. 286 Minn. 1922
Glassman v. Radke 188 N.W. 286 Minn. 1922
We indicate our opinion on the merits toi the end that the parties may avoid further expense in an effort to continue the litigation, following the policy pursued in Peters v. City of Duluth, 119 Minn. 96 , , 41 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1044, and in State v. County of Mower, 150 Minn. 163 , .
Board of Water Commissioners v. Roselawn Cemetery 165 N.W. 279 Minn. 1917
Board of Water Commissioners v. Roselawn Cemetery 165 N.W. 279 Minn. 1917
T. Co. v. Goodspeed, 128 Minn. 66 , ; Peters v. City of Duluth, 119 Minn. 96 , , 41 L.R.A.(N.S.)
Hawley v. Wallace 163 N.W. 127 Minn. 1917
Hawley v. Wallace 163 N.W. 127 Minn. 1917
510 ; Schmidt v. Schmidt, 47 Minn. 451 , ; State v. Kingsley, 85 Minn. 215 , ; Peters v. City of Duluth, 119 Minn. 96 , , 41 L.R.A.(N.S.)
Morton Brick & Tile Co. v. Sodergren 153 N.W. 527 Minn. 1915
Morton Brick & Tile Co. v. Sodergren 153 N.W. 527 Minn. 1915
Whallon v. Bancroft, 4 Minn. 70 (109); State v. Kingsley, 85 Minn. 215, 218 , ; Peters v. City of Duluth, 119 Minn. 96 , , 41 L.R.A.(N.S.)
Seeger v. Young 149 N.W. 735 Minn. 1914
Seeger v. Young 149 N.W. 735 Minn. 1914
The purpose of the Torrens Act is to provide a speedy and summary remedy to settle the title to land (Reed v. Siddall, 94 Minn. 216 , ; Peters v. City of Duluth, 119 Minn. 96, 106 , , 41 L.R.A.[N.S.]
State ex rel. Wilcox v. Ryder 147 N.W. 953 Minn. 1914
State ex rel. Wilcox v. Ryder 147 N.W. 953 Minn. 1914
Peters v. City of Duluth, 119 Minn. 96, 101 , , 41 L.R.A.(N.S.)
Johnson Service Co. v. Kruse 140 N.W. 118 Minn. 1913
Johnson Service Co. v. Kruse 140 N.W. 118 Minn. 1913
See Peters v. City of Duluth, 119 Minn. 96 , , for a recent discussion of the right to a jury trial in equitable actions.
Brown v. Hagadorn 138 N.W. 941 Minn. 1912
Brown v. Hagadorn 138 N.W. 941 Minn. 1912
Owsley v. Johnson, 95 Minn. 168 , ; Peters v. City of Duluth, supra, page 96, .