Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Dumas, 136 N.W. 311.

21 citing documents.

Thomas Robert Tichich, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
To support his argument, appellant cites State v. Dumas , in which the supreme court defined attempt as “an overt act or acts done with intent to commit the particular crime, and tending, but failing , to accomplish it.” (emphasis added).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State v. Dumas, 136 N.W. 311, 314 (Minn. 1912).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Ther e is no rule as to specific acts that are sufficient to constitute an attempt, rather, “[e] ach case must depend largely upon its particular facts.” State v. Dumas
State v. Wilkie 924 N.W.2d 38 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State v. Wilkie 924 N.W.2d 38 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State v. Dumas, 136 N.W. 311, 314 (Minn. 1912) .
In the Matter of the WELFARE OF C.J.H., Child 864 N.W.2d 194 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the WELFARE OF C.J.H., Child 864 N.W.2d 194 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
To constitute a substantial step toward the crime attempted, the act must “directly tend in some substantial degree to accomplish [the crime],” but the “act[] need not be such that, if not interrupted, [it] must result in the commission of the crime.” State v. Dumas, 118 Minn. 77, 83–84, 136 N.W.
State v. Filipovic 251 N.W.2d 110 Minn. 1977
State v. Filipovic 251 N.W.2d 110 Minn. 1977
Although certification is a proper means of presenting important or doubtful questions of law, State v. Dumas, 118 Minn. 77 , this court has imposed and enforced limitations on its use.
State v. Dahlstrom 150 N.W.2d 53 Minn. 1967
State v. Dahlstrom 150 N.W.2d 53 Minn. 1967
ng means is guilty of manslaughter in the second degree and may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than seven years or to payment of a fine of not more than $7,000, or both: “(1) By his culpable negligence whereby he creates an unreasonable risk, and consciously takes chances of causing death or great bodily harm to another.” 5 Minnesota cases dealing with attempts include: State v. Dumas, 118 Minn. 77 , , 41 L. R. A. (N. S.) 439; State v. Lampe, 131 *309 Minn. 65, ; State v. McLeavey, 15
State v. Moller 149 N.W.2d 274 Minn. 1967
State v. Moller 149 N.W.2d 274 Minn. 1967
State v. Dumas, 118 Minn. 77 , , 41 L. R. A. (N. S.) 439; State v. Loomis, 27 Minn. 521 , ; State v. Billings, 96 Minn. 533 , ; State v. Smith, 116 Minn. 228 , ; *188 State v. Wellman, 143 Minn. 488 , ; State v. Lyckholm, 150 Minn. 532 , ; State v. Schifsky, 243 Mi
State v. Schifsky 69 N.W.2d 89 Minn. 1955
State v. Schifsky 69 N.W.2d 89 Minn. 1955
State v. Dumas, 118 Minn. 77 , , 41 L.R.A.
State v. Lowrie 54 N.W.2d 265 Minn. 1952
State v. Lowrie 54 N.W.2d 265 Minn. 1952
attempt to commit a crime something more than the mere solici *243 tation of another to commit it is necessary (State v. Lampe, 131 Minn. 65 , ); that mere acts of preparation remote from the time and place of the intended crime, unaccompanied by other overt acts performed pursuant to the attempt, are insufficient to constitute such an attempt (State v. Lampe, supra; State v. Dumas, 118 Minn. 77 , , 41 L.R.A.
State v. Lampe 154 N.W. 737 Minn. 1915
State v. Lampe 154 N.W. 737 Minn. 1915
State v. Dumas, 118 Minn. 77 , , 41 L.R.A.