Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State ex rel. Nordin v. Erickson, 137 N.W. 385.

28 citing documents.

Clayton v. Kiffmeyer 688 N.W.2d 117 Minn. 2004
Clayton v. Kiffmeyer 688 N.W.2d 117 Minn. 2004
Nordin v. Erickson, 119 Minn. 152, 156 , 137 N.W.
Page v. Carlson 488 N.W.2d 274 Minn. 1992
Page v. Carlson 488 N.W.2d 274 Minn. 1992
Nordin v. Erickson, 119 Minn. 152, 155-56 , 137 N.W.
Touhey v. Donovan 105 N.W.2d 849 Minn. 1960
Touhey v. Donovan 105 N.W.2d 849 Minn. 1960
Nordin v. Erickson, 119 Minn. 152, 156 , , we said: “The Constitution does not attempt to regulate the exercise of the right of eligibility to office or to vote, but they are, of necessity, left for legislative action.
State v. Red Owl Stores, Inc. 92 N.W.2d 103 Minn. 1958
State v. Red Owl Stores, Inc. 92 N.W.2d 103 Minn. 1958
In that case we observed ( 119 Minn. 152 , , 41 L.R.A.
Gustafson v. Holm 44 N.W.2d 443 Minn. 1950
Gustafson v. Holm 44 N.W.2d 443 Minn. 1950
Nordin v. Erickson, 119 Minn. 152, 154 , , we upheld the constitutionality of L. 1912, c. 2, § 2, 3 which provided: *122 “When two or more persons are to be elected for the same office, at a general election running at large in a city, county, district or in this state, such offices shall be classified and numbered as hereinafter provide
State Ex Rel. Boedigheimer v. Welter 293 N.W. 914 Minn. 1940
State Ex Rel. Boedigheimer v. Welter 293 N.W. 914 Minn. 1940
Nordin v. Erickson, 119 Minn. 152, 156 , ; Saari v. Gleason, 126 Minn. 378, 382 , ; Hoffman v. Downs, 145 Minn. 465 , .
State Ex Rel. Wharton v. Babcock 232 N.W. 718 Minn. 1930
State Ex Rel. Wharton v. Babcock 232 N.W. 718 Minn. 1930
Nordin v. Erickson, 119 Minn. 152 , , 41 L.R.A.(N.S.)
State Ex Rel. 25 Voters v. Selvig 212 N.W. 604 Minn. 1927
State Ex Rel. 25 Voters v. Selvig 212 N.W. 604 Minn. 1927
Nordin v. Erickson, 119 Minn. 152 , ; Sawyer v. Frankson, 134 Minn. 258 , ; Newberry v. United States, 256 U. S. 232 , 41 Sup.
State Ex Rel. Froehlich v. Ries 209 N.W. 327 Minn. 1926
State Ex Rel. Froehlich v. Ries 209 N.W. 327 Minn. 1926
State v. Holman, 58 Minn. 219, 226 , ; State v. Erickson, 119 Minn. 152, 156 , ; Saara v. Gleason, 126 Minn. 378, 382 , ; Hoffman v. Downs, 145 Minn. 465 , .
State ex rel. Carroll v. Schmahl 156 N.W. 8 Minn. 1916
State ex rel. Carroll v. Schmahl 156 N.W. 8 Minn. 1916
State v. Erickson, 119 Minn. 152 , ; Brown v. Smallwood, 130 Minn. 492 , .
Brown v. Smallwood 153 N.W. 953 Minn. 1915
Brown v. Smallwood 153 N.W. 953 Minn. 1915
It would, in certain cases, deprive the voter of his privilege to exercise the elective franchise.” And in State v. Erickson, 119 Minn. 152 , , Chief Justice Start said that “statutory regulations applicable only to a primary election, which might be repugnant to the Constitution if extended to elections, are not necessarily invalid.” The quotations made from the different cases are not chance expressions.
Saari v. Gleason 148 N.W. 293 Minn. 1914
Saari v. Gleason 148 N.W. 293 Minn. 1914
State v. Erickson, 119 Minn. 152 , ; State v. Bates, 102 Minn. 104 , , 12 Ann. Cas.
Farrell v. Hicken 147 N.W. 815 Minn. 1914
Farrell v. Hicken 147 N.W. 815 Minn. 1914
State v. Erickson, 119 Minn. 152 , .
State ex rel. Olson v. Erickson 146 N.W. 364 Minn. 1914
State ex rel. Olson v. Erickson 146 N.W. 364 Minn. 1914
State v. Erickson, 119 Minn. 152 , ; State v. Moore, 87 Minn. 308 , , 59 L.R.A.