Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Olson, 131 N.W. 1084.

36 citing documents.

State v. Wolske 160 N.W.2d 146 Minn. 1968
State v. Wolske 160 N.W.2d 146 Minn. 1968
State v. Olson, 115 Minn. 153 , ; State v. Harding, 260 Minn. 464 , 110 N. W. (2d) 463 .
State v. Paulick 151 N.W.2d 591 Minn. 1967
State v. Paulick 151 N.W.2d 591 Minn. 1967
Perhaps the court’s attitude has not been better stated than in State v. Olson, 115 Minn. 153, 155 , , 1085: “The purpose of the legislature in the enactment of the statute was to simplify the prosecution of minor offenses in the municipal court, and to dispense with the necessity of technical accuracy as followed in felonies and indictable crimes.
State v. Hayes 150 N.W.2d 552 Minn. 1967
State v. Hayes 150 N.W.2d 552 Minn. 1967
952 ; State v. Henspeter, 199 Minn. 359 , ; State v. Olson, 115 Minn. 153 , ; State v. Prickett, 217 Minn. 629 , 15 N. W. (2d) 95 .
State v. Waldron 139 N.W.2d 785 Minn. 1966
State v. Waldron 139 N.W.2d 785 Minn. 1966
State v. Harding, 260 Minn. 464 , 110 N. W. (2d) 463 ; State v. Jones, 234 Minn. 438 , 48 N. W. (2d) 662 ; State v. *69 McDonnell, 165 Minn. 423 , ; State v. Olson, 115 Minn. 153 , ; State v. Henspeter, 199 Minn. 359 , ; State v. Prickett, 217 Minn. 629 , 15 N. W. (2d) 95 .
State v. Harding 110 N.W.2d 463 Minn. 1961
State v. Harding 110 N.W.2d 463 Minn. 1961
State v. Jones, 234 Minn. 438 , 48 *471 N. W. (2d) 662; State v. McDonnell, 165 Minn. 423 , ; State v. Olson, 115 Minn. 153 , ; State v. Henspeter, 199 Minn. 359 , ; State v. Prickett, 217 Minn. 629 , 15 N. W. (2d) 95 .
State v. Ketterer 79 N.W.2d 136 Minn. 1956
State v. Ketterer 79 N.W.2d 136 Minn. 1956
State v. Olson, 115 Minn. 153 , .
State v. End 45 N.W.2d 378 Minn. 1950
State v. End 45 N.W.2d 378 Minn. 1950
5 State v. Siporen, 215 Minn. 438 , 10 N. W. (2d) 353 ; State v. Wilson, 212 Minn. 380 , 3 N. W. (2d) 677 ; State v. Jamieson, 211 Minn. 262 , ; State v. Olson, 115 Minn. 153 , .
City of St. Paul v. Stovall 30 N.W.2d 638 Minn. 1948
City of St. Paul v. Stovall 30 N.W.2d 638 Minn. 1948
We recognize,' however, as stated in State v. Olson, 115 Minn. 153, 155 , , that— “* * * The police courts of our large cities are often daily confronted with large numbers of petty offenders, and it would be intolerable to require that their proceedings be in form those prescribed for higher courts and higher offenses.
State v. Siporen 10 N.W.2d 353 Minn. 1943
State v. Siporen 10 N.W.2d 353 Minn. 1943
State v. Olson, 115 Minn. 153 , ; State v. Jamieson, 211 Minn. 262 , ; State v. Wilson, 212 Minn. 380 , 3 N. W. (2d) 677 .
State v. Wilson 3 N.W.2d 677 Minn. 1942
State v. Wilson 3 N.W.2d 677 Minn. 1942
Such “proceedings must of necessity be more or less summary and informal, and so long as the substantial or constitutional rights of persons charged are not infringed or violated, convictions cannot be reversed for mere irregularity.” State v. Olson, 115 Minn. 153, 156 , ; State v. Jamieson, 211 Minn. 262 , .
State v. Tremont 240 N.W. 118 Minn. 1931
State v. Abdu 216 N.W. 540 Minn. 1927
State v. Abdu 216 N.W. 540 Minn. 1927
The complaint was made and entered in the manner referred to in the cases of State v. Olson, 115 Minn. 153 , ; State v. Benson, 171 Minn. 292 , , and other cases, and is held sufficient.
State v. Tworuk 214 N.W. 778 Minn. 1927
State v. Tworuk 214 N.W. 778 Minn. 1927
State v. Olson, 115 Minn. 153 , ; State v. LaDue, 164 Minn. 499 , ; State v. Benson, 171 Minn. 292 , .
State v. McDonnell 206 N.W. 952 Minn. 1926
State v. McDonnell 206 N.W. 952 Minn. 1926
State v. Olson, 115 Minn. 153 , .
State v. La Due 205 N.W. 450 Minn. 1925
State v. La Due 205 N.W. 450 Minn. 1925
L. 1889): “In cases where alleged offenders shall be in custody, and brought before the court or the clerk, without process, the clerk shall enter upon the records of the court a brief statement of the offense with which the defendant is charged, which shall stand in place of a complaint, unless the court shall direct a formal complaint to be made.” State v. Olson, 115 Minn. 153 , .
State v. Rudin 189 N.W. 710 Minn. 1922
State v. Rudin 189 N.W. 710 Minn. 1922
The case of State v. Olson, 115 Minn. 153 , , on which the relator relies, is not in point, for the questions involved in that case were presented on an appeal from the judgment.
State v. Broms 166 N.W. 771 Minn. 1918
State v. Broms 166 N.W. 771 Minn. 1918
The contention that the complaint is insufficient is decided to the contrary in State v. Olson, 115 Minn. 153 , , which case also distinguishes the one at bar from State v. Swanson, 106 Minn. 288 , .
State v. Claire 140 N.W. 747 Minn. 1913
State v. Claire 140 N.W. 747 Minn. 1913
The complaint held sufficient in State v. Olson, 115 Minn. 153 , , charged the offense substantially in the words of the ordinance.
State v. Strum 131 N.W. 1086 Minn. 1911
This case presents the same questions disposed of in the opinion in State v. Olson, supra, page 153, , and the same conclusion is reached.